Effect of Cooling of Lidocaine with Epinephrine on the Anesthetic Success of Supplementary Intraligamentary Injection after a Failed Primary Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1.6 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Vivek Aggarwal, Mamta Singla, Masoud Saatchi, Alpa Gupta, Mukesh Hasija, Babita Meena
{"title":"Effect of Cooling of Lidocaine with Epinephrine on the Anesthetic Success of Supplementary Intraligamentary Injection after a Failed Primary Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Vivek Aggarwal, Mamta Singla, Masoud Saatchi, Alpa Gupta, Mukesh Hasija, Babita Meena","doi":"10.14744/eej.2023.41275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this prospective, randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the effect of cooling a 2% lidocaine solution with 1: 200,000 epinephrine, administered as a supplementary intraligamentary injection to overcome a failed primary inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was preceded by a pilot study to evaluate the anesthetic efficacy of plain lidocaine solutions given as intraligamentary injections. In the subsequent randomized clinical trial, one hundred and thirty-eight patients received IANB with 2% lidocaine with 1: 80,000 epinephrine for endodontic man- agement of a mandibular molar with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. Eighty-eight patients reported pain greater than 54 mm on a visual analog scale (Heft-Parker VAS) were categorized as unsuccessful anesthesia. These patients received either of the following intraligamentary injections: 2% lidocaine with 1: 200,000 epinephrine at room temperature; or 2% lidocaine with 1: 200,000 epinephrine at 4°C. Anes- thetic success was again evaluated after re-initiation of the endodontic treatment. The heart rates of the patients were measured using a finger pulse oximeter. The categorical success rates were statistically analyzed with the Pearson chi-square test at 5% significance levels. The heart rate measurements were analyzed using a t-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intraligamentary injections with anesthetic solutions at room temperature presented a suc- cess rate of 59.1%, while the injections with a solution at 4°C gave a success rate of 52.27%. There were no significant differences between the success rates of the groups (χ2=0.41, p=0.52). Regarding the heart rates, there were no differences between the two solutions at baseline (T=1.2, p=0.2) or after injections (T=0.64, p=0.52).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reducing the temperature of 2% lidocaine with 1: 200,000 epinephrine to 4°C does not affect the anesthetic efficacy of supplemental intraligamentary injections, given after a failed primary IANB. (EEJ-2023-03-044).</p>","PeriodicalId":11860,"journal":{"name":"European Endodontic Journal","volume":"8 1","pages":"239-245"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10500213/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2023.41275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this prospective, randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the effect of cooling a 2% lidocaine solution with 1: 200,000 epinephrine, administered as a supplementary intraligamentary injection to overcome a failed primary inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB).

Methods: The study was preceded by a pilot study to evaluate the anesthetic efficacy of plain lidocaine solutions given as intraligamentary injections. In the subsequent randomized clinical trial, one hundred and thirty-eight patients received IANB with 2% lidocaine with 1: 80,000 epinephrine for endodontic man- agement of a mandibular molar with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. Eighty-eight patients reported pain greater than 54 mm on a visual analog scale (Heft-Parker VAS) were categorized as unsuccessful anesthesia. These patients received either of the following intraligamentary injections: 2% lidocaine with 1: 200,000 epinephrine at room temperature; or 2% lidocaine with 1: 200,000 epinephrine at 4°C. Anes- thetic success was again evaluated after re-initiation of the endodontic treatment. The heart rates of the patients were measured using a finger pulse oximeter. The categorical success rates were statistically analyzed with the Pearson chi-square test at 5% significance levels. The heart rate measurements were analyzed using a t-test.

Results: The intraligamentary injections with anesthetic solutions at room temperature presented a suc- cess rate of 59.1%, while the injections with a solution at 4°C gave a success rate of 52.27%. There were no significant differences between the success rates of the groups (χ2=0.41, p=0.52). Regarding the heart rates, there were no differences between the two solutions at baseline (T=1.2, p=0.2) or after injections (T=0.64, p=0.52).

Conclusion: Reducing the temperature of 2% lidocaine with 1: 200,000 epinephrine to 4°C does not affect the anesthetic efficacy of supplemental intraligamentary injections, given after a failed primary IANB. (EEJ-2023-03-044).

利多卡因与肾上腺素冷却对原发性下肺泡神经阻滞失败后补充韧带内注射麻醉成功的影响:一项随机对照试验
目的本前瞻性随机临床试验的目的是评估用1:200000肾上腺素冷却2%利多卡因溶液作为补充韧带内注射以克服失败的原发性下牙槽神经阻滞(IANB)的效果。方法在研究之前进行了一项初步研究,以评估作为韧带内注射的利多卡因溶液的麻醉效果。在随后的随机临床试验中,138名患者接受了2%利多卡因和1:80000肾上腺素的IANB治疗,用于治疗有症状的不可逆牙髓炎的下颌磨牙。88名患者在视觉模拟量表(Heft-Parker VAS)上报告疼痛大于54毫米,被归类为麻醉不成功。这些患者接受了以下任一种韧带内注射:室温下2%利多卡因和1:200000肾上腺素;或2%利多卡因与1:200000肾上腺素在4°C下混合。在重新开始牙髓治疗后再次评估麻醉成功率。使用手指脉搏血氧计测量患者的心率。分类成功率采用皮尔逊卡方检验进行统计学分析,显著性水平为5%。使用t检验对心率测量值进行分析。结果在室温下用麻醉溶液进行韧带内注射的成功率为59.1%,而在4°C下用麻醉剂溶液进行的注射成功率为52.27%。两组的成功率无显著差异(χ2=0.41,p=0.52),两种溶液在基线时(T=1.2,p=0.02)或注射后(T=0.64,p=0.052)没有差异。结论用1:200000肾上腺素将2%利多卡因的温度降低到4°C不会影响原发性IANB失败后进行的韧带内补充注射的麻醉效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Endodontic Journal
European Endodontic Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信