Pastoralism in Africa: A land-based livelihood practice analogous to swimming against the tide

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
P. Byakagaba
{"title":"Pastoralism in Africa: A land-based livelihood practice analogous to swimming against the tide","authors":"P. Byakagaba","doi":"10.1353/scr.2020.0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Pastoralism which is a land-based livelihood strategy that involves keeping livestock through opportunistic utilisation of rangeland resources through cyclic movement of herds on communally owned land has been practiced for thousands of years in Africa. In spite of growing literature showing that this practice suits the socio-ecological realities of the rangelands in Africa, it continues to be discouraged and vilified by mainstream range ecologists, political leaders, conservation organisations and bureaucrats. It is perceived as archaic, inefficient and unsustainable. This notion has been challenged by non-equilibrium theorists who argue that pastoralism reduces exposure, sensitivity and enhances adaptive capacity of pastoralists. Pastoralism enables optimisation of the use of the range, facilitates access to seasonally available resources and enables evasion of disease-prone areas thus sustaining livestock production under all circumstances. It promotes ecological health of rangelands by maintaining plant diversity through the historical plant-herbivore interaction. It enhances social capital, mutual assistance networks and community cohesion. In spite of all the aforementioned benefits, governments in Africa are using discursive and governmentality means of exercising power to limit pastoralism. This has negatively affected the socio-ecological resilience of areas occupied by pastoralists. There is need to integrate pastoralists’ knowledge in land use and pastoral development policies to ensure that they are responsive to the socio-ecological realities.","PeriodicalId":42938,"journal":{"name":"South Central Review","volume":"37 1","pages":"71 - 78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/scr.2020.0016","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Central Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/scr.2020.0016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Pastoralism which is a land-based livelihood strategy that involves keeping livestock through opportunistic utilisation of rangeland resources through cyclic movement of herds on communally owned land has been practiced for thousands of years in Africa. In spite of growing literature showing that this practice suits the socio-ecological realities of the rangelands in Africa, it continues to be discouraged and vilified by mainstream range ecologists, political leaders, conservation organisations and bureaucrats. It is perceived as archaic, inefficient and unsustainable. This notion has been challenged by non-equilibrium theorists who argue that pastoralism reduces exposure, sensitivity and enhances adaptive capacity of pastoralists. Pastoralism enables optimisation of the use of the range, facilitates access to seasonally available resources and enables evasion of disease-prone areas thus sustaining livestock production under all circumstances. It promotes ecological health of rangelands by maintaining plant diversity through the historical plant-herbivore interaction. It enhances social capital, mutual assistance networks and community cohesion. In spite of all the aforementioned benefits, governments in Africa are using discursive and governmentality means of exercising power to limit pastoralism. This has negatively affected the socio-ecological resilience of areas occupied by pastoralists. There is need to integrate pastoralists’ knowledge in land use and pastoral development policies to ensure that they are responsive to the socio-ecological realities.
非洲的田园主义:一种类似于逆流而上的陆上生计实践
摘要:畜牧业是一种以土地为基础的生计战略,包括通过在公有土地上循环流动牛群来机会主义地利用牧场资源来饲养牲畜,在非洲已经实践了数千年。尽管越来越多的文献表明这种做法符合非洲牧场的社会生态现实,但主流牧场生态学家、政治领导人、保护组织和官僚们仍对这种做法表示劝阻和诋毁。它被认为是过时的、低效的和不可持续的。这一概念受到了非平衡理论家的挑战,他们认为畜牧业减少了牧民的暴露、敏感性并提高了他们的适应能力。畜牧业能够优化牧场的使用,有助于获得季节性可用资源,并能够避开疾病多发地区,从而在任何情况下维持牲畜生产。它通过历史上的植物-食草动物相互作用来保持植物多样性,从而促进牧场的生态健康。它增强了社会资本、互助网络和社区凝聚力。尽管有上述所有好处,非洲各国政府仍在使用散漫和治理的方式行使权力,以限制畜牧业。这对牧民居住地区的社会生态恢复能力产生了负面影响。有必要将牧民的知识纳入土地利用和畜牧业发展政策,以确保他们对社会生态现实做出反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
South Central Review
South Central Review HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信