Hydrodynamics structure plankton communities and interactions in a freshwater tidal estuary

IF 7.1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Adrianne P. Smits, Luke C. Loken, Erwin E. Van Nieuwenhuyse, Matthew J. Young, Paul R. Stumpner, Leah E. K. Lenoch, Jon R. Burau, Randy A. Dahlgren, Tiffany Brown, Steven Sadro
{"title":"Hydrodynamics structure plankton communities and interactions in a freshwater tidal estuary","authors":"Adrianne P. Smits,&nbsp;Luke C. Loken,&nbsp;Erwin E. Van Nieuwenhuyse,&nbsp;Matthew J. Young,&nbsp;Paul R. Stumpner,&nbsp;Leah E. K. Lenoch,&nbsp;Jon R. Burau,&nbsp;Randy A. Dahlgren,&nbsp;Tiffany Brown,&nbsp;Steven Sadro","doi":"10.1002/ecm.1567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Drivers of phytoplankton and zooplankton dynamics vary spatially and temporally in estuaries due to variation in hydrodynamic exchange and residence time, complicating efforts to understand controls on food web productivity. We conducted approximately monthly (2012–2019; <i>n</i> = 74) longitudinal sampling at 10 fixed stations along a freshwater tidal terminal channel in the San Francisco Estuary, California, characterized by seaward to landward gradients in water residence time, turbidity, nutrient concentrations, and plankton community composition. We used multivariate autoregressive state space (MARSS) models to quantify environmental (abiotic) and biotic controls on phytoplankton and mesozooplankton biomass. The importance of specific abiotic drivers (e.g., water temperature, turbidity, nutrients) and trophic interactions differed significantly among hydrodynamic exchange zones with different mean residence times. Abiotic drivers explained more variation in phytoplankton and zooplankton dynamics than a model including only trophic interactions, but individual phytoplankton–zooplankton interactions explained more variation than individual abiotic drivers. Interactions between zooplankton and phytoplankton were strongest in landward reaches with the longest residence times and the highest zooplankton biomass. Interactions between cryptophytes and both copepods and cladocerans were stronger than interactions between bacillariophytes (diatoms) and zooplankton taxa, despite contributing less biovolume in all but the most landward reaches. Our results demonstrate that trophic interactions and their relative strengths vary in a hydrodynamic context, contributing to food web heterogeneity within estuaries at spatial scales smaller than the freshwater to marine transition.</p>","PeriodicalId":11505,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Monographs","volume":"93 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecm.1567","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecm.1567","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Drivers of phytoplankton and zooplankton dynamics vary spatially and temporally in estuaries due to variation in hydrodynamic exchange and residence time, complicating efforts to understand controls on food web productivity. We conducted approximately monthly (2012–2019; n = 74) longitudinal sampling at 10 fixed stations along a freshwater tidal terminal channel in the San Francisco Estuary, California, characterized by seaward to landward gradients in water residence time, turbidity, nutrient concentrations, and plankton community composition. We used multivariate autoregressive state space (MARSS) models to quantify environmental (abiotic) and biotic controls on phytoplankton and mesozooplankton biomass. The importance of specific abiotic drivers (e.g., water temperature, turbidity, nutrients) and trophic interactions differed significantly among hydrodynamic exchange zones with different mean residence times. Abiotic drivers explained more variation in phytoplankton and zooplankton dynamics than a model including only trophic interactions, but individual phytoplankton–zooplankton interactions explained more variation than individual abiotic drivers. Interactions between zooplankton and phytoplankton were strongest in landward reaches with the longest residence times and the highest zooplankton biomass. Interactions between cryptophytes and both copepods and cladocerans were stronger than interactions between bacillariophytes (diatoms) and zooplankton taxa, despite contributing less biovolume in all but the most landward reaches. Our results demonstrate that trophic interactions and their relative strengths vary in a hydrodynamic context, contributing to food web heterogeneity within estuaries at spatial scales smaller than the freshwater to marine transition.

Abstract Image

淡水潮河口的水动力结构浮游生物群落及其相互作用
由于水动力交换和停留时间的变化,河口浮游植物和浮游动物动态的驱动因素在空间和时间上都存在差异,这使得了解食物网生产力控制的努力变得复杂。我们大约每月进行一次(2012-2019;n = 74)在加州旧金山河口淡水潮汐终端通道沿线的10个固定站点进行纵向采样,以海水停留时间、浊度、营养物质浓度和浮游生物群落组成的海向向梯度为特征。我们使用多元自回归状态空间(MARSS)模型来量化环境(非生物)和生物对浮游植物和中浮游动物生物量的控制。在不同平均停留时间的水动力交换带中,特定的非生物驱动因素(如水温、浊度、营养物)和营养相互作用的重要性存在显著差异。与仅包括营养相互作用的模型相比,非生物驱动因素解释了浮游植物和浮游动物动力学的更多变化,但个体浮游植物-浮游动物相互作用比个体非生物驱动因素解释了更多变化。浮游动物与浮游植物的相互作用在向陆段最强,停留时间最长,浮游动物生物量最高。隐生植物与桡足类和枝海动物之间的相互作用强于硅藻与浮游动物之间的相互作用,尽管在除最靠近陆地的河段外的所有河段贡献的生物量都较少。我们的研究结果表明,营养相互作用及其相对强度在水动力背景下变化,导致河口食物网在空间尺度上的异质性小于淡水向海洋过渡的空间尺度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Monographs
Ecological Monographs 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The vision for Ecological Monographs is that it should be the place for publishing integrative, synthetic papers that elaborate new directions for the field of ecology. Original Research Papers published in Ecological Monographs will continue to document complex observational, experimental, or theoretical studies that by their very integrated nature defy dissolution into shorter publications focused on a single topic or message. Reviews will be comprehensive and synthetic papers that establish new benchmarks in the field, define directions for future research, contribute to fundamental understanding of ecological principles, and derive principles for ecological management in its broadest sense (including, but not limited to: conservation, mitigation, restoration, and pro-active protection of the environment). Reviews should reflect the full development of a topic and encompass relevant natural history, observational and experimental data, analyses, models, and theory. Reviews published in Ecological Monographs should further blur the boundaries between “basic” and “applied” ecology. Concepts and Synthesis papers will conceptually advance the field of ecology. These papers are expected to go well beyond works being reviewed and include discussion of new directions, new syntheses, and resolutions of old questions. In this world of rapid scientific advancement and never-ending environmental change, there needs to be room for the thoughtful integration of scientific ideas, data, and concepts that feeds the mind and guides the development of the maturing science of ecology. Ecological Monographs provides that room, with an expansive view to a sustainable future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信