Implementing evidence-based practice: the challenge of delivering what works for people with learning disabilities at risk of behaviours that challenge

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Louise D. Denne, N. Gore, J. Hughes, S. Toogood, E. Jones, Freddy Jackson Brown
{"title":"Implementing evidence-based practice: the challenge of delivering what works for people with learning disabilities at risk of behaviours that challenge","authors":"Louise D. Denne, N. Gore, J. Hughes, S. Toogood, E. Jones, Freddy Jackson Brown","doi":"10.1108/tldr-05-2020-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is an apparent disconnect between the understanding of best practice and service delivery in the support of people with learning disabilities at risk of behaviours that challenge. We suggest, is a problem of implementation. The purpose of this paper is to explore reasons why this might be the case: a failure to recognise the collective works of successive generations of research and practice; and a failure to address the macro-systems involved and systems changes needed to support implementation. \nDesign/methodology/approach: This paper reviews the consensus that exists in respect of best practice. Drawing upon ideas from implementation science the paper highlights the complexities involved in the implementation of all evidence-based practices and uses this as a framework to propose ways in which an infrastructure that facilitates the delivery of services in the learning disabilities field might be built. \nFindings: This paper highlights core recommended practices that have been consistent over time and across sources and identifies the systems involved in the implementation process. This paper demonstrates that many of the necessary building blocks of implementation already exist and suggests areas that are yet to be addressed. Critically, the paper highlights the importance of, and the part that all systems need to play in the process. \nOriginality/value: In the absence of any generalised implementation frameworks of evidence-based practice in the learning disabilities field, the paper suggests that the findings may provide the basis for understanding how the gap that exists between best practice and service delivery in the support of people with a learning disability at risk of behaviours that challenge might be closed.","PeriodicalId":54179,"journal":{"name":"Tizard Learning Disability Review","volume":"25 1","pages":"133-143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tizard Learning Disability Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tldr-05-2020-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

There is an apparent disconnect between the understanding of best practice and service delivery in the support of people with learning disabilities at risk of behaviours that challenge. We suggest, is a problem of implementation. The purpose of this paper is to explore reasons why this might be the case: a failure to recognise the collective works of successive generations of research and practice; and a failure to address the macro-systems involved and systems changes needed to support implementation. Design/methodology/approach: This paper reviews the consensus that exists in respect of best practice. Drawing upon ideas from implementation science the paper highlights the complexities involved in the implementation of all evidence-based practices and uses this as a framework to propose ways in which an infrastructure that facilitates the delivery of services in the learning disabilities field might be built. Findings: This paper highlights core recommended practices that have been consistent over time and across sources and identifies the systems involved in the implementation process. This paper demonstrates that many of the necessary building blocks of implementation already exist and suggests areas that are yet to be addressed. Critically, the paper highlights the importance of, and the part that all systems need to play in the process. Originality/value: In the absence of any generalised implementation frameworks of evidence-based practice in the learning disabilities field, the paper suggests that the findings may provide the basis for understanding how the gap that exists between best practice and service delivery in the support of people with a learning disability at risk of behaviours that challenge might be closed.
实施循证实践:为有挑战行为风险的学习障碍者提供有效服务的挑战
在支持有挑战行为风险的学习障碍者方面,对最佳做法的理解与服务提供之间存在明显脱节。我们建议,是一个执行问题。本文的目的是探讨为什么会出现这种情况:未能认识到几代研究和实践的集体成果;以及未能解决所涉及的宏观系统和支持实施所需的系统变革问题。设计/方法/方法:本文回顾了在最佳实践方面存在的共识。该论文借鉴了实施科学的思想,强调了实施所有循证实践所涉及的复杂性,并以此为框架,提出了建立有助于在学习障碍领域提供服务的基础设施的方法。调查结果:本文强调了长期以来和跨来源一致的核心建议做法,并确定了实施过程中涉及的系统。本文件表明,许多必要的执行组成部分已经存在,并提出了有待解决的领域。至关重要的是,本文强调了所有系统在这一过程中的重要性和需要发挥的作用。独创性/价值:在学习障碍领域缺乏任何循证实践的通用实施框架的情况下,论文认为,研究结果可能为理解如何缩小最佳实践与服务提供之间的差距提供基础,以支持有挑战行为风险的学习障碍者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tizard Learning Disability Review
Tizard Learning Disability Review EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信