Flynn-effekten i Norge og andre land: Praktiske implikasjoner og teoretiske spørsmål [The Flynn effect in Norway and other countries: Practical implications and theoretical issues]

Q3 Psychology
Olav Storsve, J. Sundet, T. Torjussen, O. C. Lang-Ree
{"title":"Flynn-effekten i Norge og andre land: Praktiske implikasjoner og teoretiske spørsmål [The Flynn effect in Norway and other countries: Practical implications and theoretical issues]","authors":"Olav Storsve, J. Sundet, T. Torjussen, O. C. Lang-Ree","doi":"10.15714/SCANDPSYCHOL.5.E6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A number of studies have documented significant gains in mean IQ scores across generations (the Flynn effect). Flynn effects have been found in more than 30 industrialized nations, including Norway, but also in developing nations in Latin America and Africa. In the current paper, we present international and Norwegian results attained from young male military conscripts, encompassing new and unpublished data. In accordance with international data, the mean IQ scores in Norway increased from test years in the late 1950s (birth cohorts ≈ 1938–1940), but with decreasing gain rates, to the mid-1990s. After the mid-1990s, increases in the means ceased and exhibited decreasing tendencies. Our new data set shows that these decreases have continued into the new millennium. Practical and methodological consequences of the secular trends in IQ scores are often overlooked. We address issues related to the use of intelligence tests in situations where decisions with potentially serious consequences for participants are involved. In particular, we underscore the need for test norms that take the Flynn effect into consideration. In cross-sectional studies, age and birth cohort are completely confounded. Effects of birth cohort on intelligence (Flynn effect) have often been wrongly interpreted as age effects. To study age effects, longitudinal studies are needed. There are several theories addressing the possible causes of the Flynn effect. In the present paper we discuss how well existing theories explain known facts, with special emphasis placed on the Norwegian data.","PeriodicalId":37593,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Psychologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Psychologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15714/SCANDPSYCHOL.5.E6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A number of studies have documented significant gains in mean IQ scores across generations (the Flynn effect). Flynn effects have been found in more than 30 industrialized nations, including Norway, but also in developing nations in Latin America and Africa. In the current paper, we present international and Norwegian results attained from young male military conscripts, encompassing new and unpublished data. In accordance with international data, the mean IQ scores in Norway increased from test years in the late 1950s (birth cohorts ≈ 1938–1940), but with decreasing gain rates, to the mid-1990s. After the mid-1990s, increases in the means ceased and exhibited decreasing tendencies. Our new data set shows that these decreases have continued into the new millennium. Practical and methodological consequences of the secular trends in IQ scores are often overlooked. We address issues related to the use of intelligence tests in situations where decisions with potentially serious consequences for participants are involved. In particular, we underscore the need for test norms that take the Flynn effect into consideration. In cross-sectional studies, age and birth cohort are completely confounded. Effects of birth cohort on intelligence (Flynn effect) have often been wrongly interpreted as age effects. To study age effects, longitudinal studies are needed. There are several theories addressing the possible causes of the Flynn effect. In the present paper we discuss how well existing theories explain known facts, with special emphasis placed on the Norwegian data.
挪威和其他国家的弗林效应:实际意义和理论问题[挪威和其他国的弗林效果:实际意义与理论问题]
许多研究记录了几代人平均智商得分的显著提高(弗林效应)。弗林效应已经在包括挪威在内的30多个工业化国家被发现,但也在拉丁美洲和非洲的发展中国家被发现。在本论文中,我们介绍了年轻男性应征入伍者在国际和挪威取得的成果,包括新的和未发表的数据。根据国际数据,挪威的平均智商分数从20世纪50年代末的测试年(出生队列≈1938-1940)开始增加,但随着增长率的下降,一直到20世纪90年代中期。1990年代中期以后,收入的增长停止,并呈现下降趋势。我们的新数据显示,这些下降一直持续到新千年。智商得分长期趋势的实际和方法论后果经常被忽视。我们解决了在涉及对参与者可能产生严重后果的决策的情况下使用智力测试的相关问题。我们特别强调,需要制定考虑弗林效应的测试规范。在横断面研究中,年龄和出生队列完全混淆。出生队列对智力的影响(弗林效应)经常被错误地解释为年龄效应。为了研究年龄效应,需要进行纵向研究。关于弗林效应的可能原因,有几种理论。在本文中,我们讨论了现有理论如何很好地解释已知事实,特别强调挪威的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scandinavian Psychologist
Scandinavian Psychologist Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Psykologisk.no – Scandinavian Psychologist (ISSN 1894-5570) is an open-access journal sponsored by the Norwegian Society for Psychological Science. Instructions to authors are available in English and Norwegian. The word «psykologisk» means psychological. Our aim is to disseminate science-based psychological knowledge to the general public in Nordic countries, and to publish original research and professional articles of interest to the research community and the applied fields. In addition to the broader population, our target audiences are researchers and practitioners in psychology and in related fields, users of psychological services, as well as current and future students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信