Comparing simple and complex regression models in forecasting housing price: case study from Kenya

IF 1.5 Q3 URBAN STUDIES
Fredrick Otieno Okuta, T. Kivaa, Raphael M. Kieti, J. O. Okaka
{"title":"Comparing simple and complex regression models in forecasting housing price: case study from Kenya","authors":"Fredrick Otieno Okuta, T. Kivaa, Raphael M. Kieti, J. O. Okaka","doi":"10.1108/ijhma-02-2023-0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe housing market in Kenya continues to experience an excessive imbalance between supply and demand. This imbalance renders the housing market volatile, and stakeholders lose repeatedly. The purpose of the study was to forecast housing prices (HPs) in Kenya using simple and complex regression models to assess the best model for projecting the HPs in Kenya.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe study used time series data from 1975 to 2020 of the selected macroeconomic factors sourced from Kenya National Bureau of Statistics, Central Bank of Kenya and Hass Consult Limited. Linear regression, multiple regression, autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) and autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) models regression techniques were used to model HPs.\n\n\nFindings\nThe study concludes that the performance of the housing market is very sensitive to changes in the economic indicators, and therefore, the key players in the housing market should consider the performance of the economy during the project feasibility studies and appraisals. From the results, it can be deduced that complex models outperform simple models in forecasting HPs in Kenya. The vector autoregressive (VAR) model performs the best in forecasting HPs considering its lowest root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and bias proportion coefficient. ARIMA models perform dismally in forecasting HPs, and therefore, we conclude that HP is not a self-projecting variable.\n\n\nPractical implications\nA model for projecting HPs could be a game changer if applied during the project appraisal stage by the developers and project managers. The study thoroughly compared the various regression models to ascertain the best model for forecasting the prices and revealed that complex models perform better than simple models in forecasting HPs. The study recommends a VAR model in forecasting HPs considering its lowest RMSE, MAE, MAPE and bias proportion coefficient compared to other models. The model, if used in collaboration with the already existing hedonic models, will ensure that the investments in the housing markets are well-informed, and hence, a reduction in economic losses arising from poor market forecasting techniques. However, these study findings are only applicable to the commercial housing market i.e. houses for sale and rent.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nWhile more research has been done on HP projections, this study was based on a comparison of simple and complex regression models of projecting HPs. A total of five models were compared in the study: the simple regression model, multiple regression model, ARIMA model, ARDL model and VAR model. The findings reveal that complex models outperform simple models in projecting HPs. Nonetheless, the study also used nine macroeconomic indicators in the model-building process. Granger causality test reveals that only household income (HHI), gross domestic product, interest rate, exchange rates (EXCR) and private capital inflows have a significant effect on the changes in HPs. Nonetheless, the study adds two little-known indicators in the projection of HPs, which are the EXCR and HHI.\n","PeriodicalId":14136,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijhma-02-2023-0027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose The housing market in Kenya continues to experience an excessive imbalance between supply and demand. This imbalance renders the housing market volatile, and stakeholders lose repeatedly. The purpose of the study was to forecast housing prices (HPs) in Kenya using simple and complex regression models to assess the best model for projecting the HPs in Kenya. Design/methodology/approach The study used time series data from 1975 to 2020 of the selected macroeconomic factors sourced from Kenya National Bureau of Statistics, Central Bank of Kenya and Hass Consult Limited. Linear regression, multiple regression, autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) and autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) models regression techniques were used to model HPs. Findings The study concludes that the performance of the housing market is very sensitive to changes in the economic indicators, and therefore, the key players in the housing market should consider the performance of the economy during the project feasibility studies and appraisals. From the results, it can be deduced that complex models outperform simple models in forecasting HPs in Kenya. The vector autoregressive (VAR) model performs the best in forecasting HPs considering its lowest root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and bias proportion coefficient. ARIMA models perform dismally in forecasting HPs, and therefore, we conclude that HP is not a self-projecting variable. Practical implications A model for projecting HPs could be a game changer if applied during the project appraisal stage by the developers and project managers. The study thoroughly compared the various regression models to ascertain the best model for forecasting the prices and revealed that complex models perform better than simple models in forecasting HPs. The study recommends a VAR model in forecasting HPs considering its lowest RMSE, MAE, MAPE and bias proportion coefficient compared to other models. The model, if used in collaboration with the already existing hedonic models, will ensure that the investments in the housing markets are well-informed, and hence, a reduction in economic losses arising from poor market forecasting techniques. However, these study findings are only applicable to the commercial housing market i.e. houses for sale and rent. Originality/value While more research has been done on HP projections, this study was based on a comparison of simple and complex regression models of projecting HPs. A total of five models were compared in the study: the simple regression model, multiple regression model, ARIMA model, ARDL model and VAR model. The findings reveal that complex models outperform simple models in projecting HPs. Nonetheless, the study also used nine macroeconomic indicators in the model-building process. Granger causality test reveals that only household income (HHI), gross domestic product, interest rate, exchange rates (EXCR) and private capital inflows have a significant effect on the changes in HPs. Nonetheless, the study adds two little-known indicators in the projection of HPs, which are the EXCR and HHI.
简单和复杂回归模型在预测房价中的比较——以肯尼亚为例
目的肯尼亚的住房市场继续经历着供需之间的过度失衡。这种不平衡导致房地产市场动荡,利益相关者屡败屡战。该研究的目的是使用简单和复杂的回归模型预测肯尼亚的房价,以评估预测肯尼亚房价的最佳模型。设计/方法/方法该研究使用了来自肯尼亚国家统计局、肯尼亚中央银行和哈斯咨询有限公司的1975年至2020年选定宏观经济因素的时间序列数据。使用线性回归、多元回归、自回归综合移动平均(ARIMA)和自回归分布滞后(ARDL)模型回归技术对住房市场进行建模。研究发现,住房市场的表现对经济指标的变化非常敏感,因此,在项目可行性研究和评估期间,住房市场的主要参与者应考虑经济表现。从结果可以推断,在预测肯尼亚的HPs时,复杂模型优于简单模型。考虑到其最低均方根误差(RMSE)、平均绝对误差(MAE)、平均百分比误差(MAPE)和偏差比例系数,向量自回归(VAR)模型在预测HP方面表现最好。ARIMA模型在预测HP方面表现不佳,因此,我们得出结论,HP不是一个自投影变量。实际含义如果开发商和项目经理在项目评估阶段应用HP预测模型,可能会改变游戏规则。该研究彻底比较了各种回归模型,以确定预测价格的最佳模型,并表明复杂模型在预测HP方面比简单模型表现更好。该研究建议在预测HP时使用VAR模型,考虑到其与其他模型相比最低的RMSE、MAE、MAPE和偏差比例系数。如果该模型与现有的享乐模型协同使用,将确保房地产市场的投资信息充分,从而减少因市场预测技术差而造成的经济损失。然而,这些研究结果仅适用于商品房市场,即待售和出租房屋。原创性/价值虽然对HP预测进行了更多的研究,但本研究是基于预测HP的简单和复杂回归模型的比较。本研究共比较了五种模型:简单回归模型、多元回归模型、ARIMA模型、ARDL模型和VAR模型。研究结果表明,复杂模型在预测HP方面优于简单模型。尽管如此,该研究还在模型构建过程中使用了九项宏观经济指标。格兰杰因果检验表明,只有家庭收入、国内生产总值、利率、汇率和私人资本流入对家庭生产总值的变化有显著影响。尽管如此,该研究在HPs的预测中增加了两个鲜为人知的指标,即EXCR和HHI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
29.40%
发文量
68
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信