DOCTORAL (Ph.D.) PROGRAMMES IN THE USA UNIVERSITIES: INSIGHTS INTO COVERAGE OF RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION ASPECT

K. Shykhnenko
{"title":"DOCTORAL (Ph.D.) PROGRAMMES IN THE USA UNIVERSITIES: INSIGHTS INTO COVERAGE OF RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION ASPECT","authors":"K. Shykhnenko","doi":"10.31499/2306-5532.2.2022.270957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study sought to identify how the doctoral (Ph.D.) programmes in US universities cover the research administration aspect, and how compatible the equivalent programmes delivered in universities in Ukraine with the above programmes are. It used the qualitative data collection methods used for empirical or explorative studies, specifically, for a systematized review. The study found categorisations of Ph.D. programmes in the USA. These programmes differ in structure, length, admission prerequisites, and other features. The programmes under study seem to be mostly elective and of specific/professional type. Importantly, almost all the programmes included or offered courses that fostered students’ transferable skills, which are indispensable for research management and administration. These courses were dedicated to writing, speaking, research ethics, networking, social entrepreneurship, project management, law, and leadership. The study discovered that Ph.D. programmes of specific/professional type are also dominant in universities in Ukraine. However, these programmes mostly focus on theoretical subjects related to the student’s area of research and writing a thesis. That’s why the courses that address issues related to research ethics, grant proposal writing, project management, research-related law, finance, and strategic planning, leadership could be added to the curriculum to add the international value of these programmes. Further research is needed for identifying how the recommended academic disciplines can influence the effectiveness of doctoral programmes and how these could be perceived by the students.","PeriodicalId":32896,"journal":{"name":"Porivnial''nopedagogichni studiyi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Porivnial''nopedagogichni studiyi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31499/2306-5532.2.2022.270957","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study sought to identify how the doctoral (Ph.D.) programmes in US universities cover the research administration aspect, and how compatible the equivalent programmes delivered in universities in Ukraine with the above programmes are. It used the qualitative data collection methods used for empirical or explorative studies, specifically, for a systematized review. The study found categorisations of Ph.D. programmes in the USA. These programmes differ in structure, length, admission prerequisites, and other features. The programmes under study seem to be mostly elective and of specific/professional type. Importantly, almost all the programmes included or offered courses that fostered students’ transferable skills, which are indispensable for research management and administration. These courses were dedicated to writing, speaking, research ethics, networking, social entrepreneurship, project management, law, and leadership. The study discovered that Ph.D. programmes of specific/professional type are also dominant in universities in Ukraine. However, these programmes mostly focus on theoretical subjects related to the student’s area of research and writing a thesis. That’s why the courses that address issues related to research ethics, grant proposal writing, project management, research-related law, finance, and strategic planning, leadership could be added to the curriculum to add the international value of these programmes. Further research is needed for identifying how the recommended academic disciplines can influence the effectiveness of doctoral programmes and how these could be perceived by the students.
美国大学博士课程:研究管理方面的覆盖范围
该研究试图确定美国大学的博士课程如何涵盖研究管理方面,以及乌克兰大学提供的同等课程与上述课程的兼容性。它使用了用于实证或探索性研究的定性数据收集方法,特别是用于系统化审查。这项研究发现,美国对博士课程的分类不同。这些课程在结构、长度、录取先决条件和其他特征上都有所不同。所研究的方案似乎大多是选修的,属于特定/专业类型。重要的是,几乎所有的课程都包括或提供了培养学生可转移技能的课程,而这些技能对于研究管理和行政管理是必不可少的。这些课程致力于写作、演讲、研究伦理、网络、社会创业、项目管理、法律和领导力。研究发现,特定/专业类型的博士课程在乌克兰的大学中也占主导地位。然而,这些课程大多侧重于与学生研究领域和撰写论文相关的理论科目。这就是为什么可以在课程中增加涉及研究伦理、拨款提案撰写、项目管理、研究相关法律、金融和战略规划、领导力等问题的课程,以增加这些课程的国际价值。需要进一步研究,以确定推荐的学术学科如何影响博士课程的有效性,以及学生如何看待这些课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信