Qualitative Study to Support Future Implementation of Peer Support in a Psychiatric Emergency Room Service in Campinas, Brazil

Diego André Hortêncio Ortega Dos Santos, Graziela Reis, M. Costa, Claudio E. M. Banzato, Chyrell D Bellamy, M. O'Connell, Heather McDonald-Bellamy, L. Davidson, R. Onocko-Campos
{"title":"Qualitative Study to Support Future Implementation of Peer Support in a Psychiatric Emergency Room Service in Campinas, Brazil","authors":"Diego André Hortêncio Ortega Dos Santos, Graziela Reis, M. Costa, Claudio E. M. Banzato, Chyrell D Bellamy, M. O'Connell, Heather McDonald-Bellamy, L. Davidson, R. Onocko-Campos","doi":"10.33137/jrmh.v5i2.38178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \n  \nObjective: This article describes the findings from a qualitative study conducted in a psychiatric emergency room at the Hospital of the State University of Campinas (Unicamp). Two focus groups collect data from people with serious mental illness (SMI) and professionals from hospital-based psychiatric services (HBPS) to explore challenges and opportunities for future implementation of peer support on Unicamp psychiatric emergency room service in Campinas Brazil. Research Design: The study was conducted in Campinas, Brazil, in January 2020. Volunteers formed two focus groups (n = 10) and discussed relevant questions to implement a peer-based model on the ER psychiatric unit. Methods: Thematic Analysis was used for this study. The sessions were recorded and later transcribed, and data were analyzed and organized in Themes. Results: The research team grouped four themes from the client's perceptions of challenges: lack of access to mental health services, lack of care, treatment voiceless, self-perception about stigma. The client's perceptions of opportunities generate two themes: trust and relationships and appraisal of emotional network and support. The professional's perceptions developed four themes of challenges described as sustainability and adherence to treatment, living with serious mental illness, ER professional roles and limits, and implementation of peer support in the ER. The professional's perceptions of opportunities generated two themes: understanding peer support roles and the positive impact of peer support in the ER. Conclusions: The qualitative data highlights the need for peer support working in the ER psychiatric unit. Also suggested the relevance of large-scale research to build strategies to future implement peer support on the ER psychiatric unit. \nKeywords:     \nQualitative research, peer support, people with serious mental illness, mental health workers.","PeriodicalId":73927,"journal":{"name":"Journal of recovery in mental health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of recovery in mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33137/jrmh.v5i2.38178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract   Objective: This article describes the findings from a qualitative study conducted in a psychiatric emergency room at the Hospital of the State University of Campinas (Unicamp). Two focus groups collect data from people with serious mental illness (SMI) and professionals from hospital-based psychiatric services (HBPS) to explore challenges and opportunities for future implementation of peer support on Unicamp psychiatric emergency room service in Campinas Brazil. Research Design: The study was conducted in Campinas, Brazil, in January 2020. Volunteers formed two focus groups (n = 10) and discussed relevant questions to implement a peer-based model on the ER psychiatric unit. Methods: Thematic Analysis was used for this study. The sessions were recorded and later transcribed, and data were analyzed and organized in Themes. Results: The research team grouped four themes from the client's perceptions of challenges: lack of access to mental health services, lack of care, treatment voiceless, self-perception about stigma. The client's perceptions of opportunities generate two themes: trust and relationships and appraisal of emotional network and support. The professional's perceptions developed four themes of challenges described as sustainability and adherence to treatment, living with serious mental illness, ER professional roles and limits, and implementation of peer support in the ER. The professional's perceptions of opportunities generated two themes: understanding peer support roles and the positive impact of peer support in the ER. Conclusions: The qualitative data highlights the need for peer support working in the ER psychiatric unit. Also suggested the relevance of large-scale research to build strategies to future implement peer support on the ER psychiatric unit. Keywords:     Qualitative research, peer support, people with serious mental illness, mental health workers.
支持巴西坎皮纳斯精神病急诊室服务未来实施同伴支持的定性研究
摘要目的:本文描述了在坎皮纳斯州立大学医院精神科急诊室进行的一项定性研究的结果。两个重点小组收集了来自严重精神病患者(SMI)和医院精神病服务(HBPS)专业人员的数据,以探索未来在巴西坎皮纳斯实施Unicamp精神病急诊室服务同行支持的挑战和机会。研究设计:该研究于2020年1月在巴西坎皮纳斯进行。志愿者组成了两个焦点小组(n=10),并讨论了相关问题,以在急诊室精神科实施基于同伴的模型。方法:采用专题分析法。会议被记录下来,随后被转录,数据被分析并按主题组织。结果:研究团队从客户对挑战的认知中分为四个主题:缺乏心理健康服务、缺乏护理、治疗无声、对污名的自我认知。客户对机会的感知产生了两个主题:信任和关系以及对情感网络和支持的评估。该专业人员的认知形成了四个挑战主题,即可持续性和坚持治疗、患有严重精神疾病、急诊室专业人员的角色和限制以及急诊室中同伴支持的实施。该专业人员对机会的认知产生了两个主题:理解同伴支持的作用和同伴支持在急诊室中的积极影响。结论:定性数据强调了在急诊室精神科工作的同伴支持的必要性。还提出了大规模研究的相关性,以制定未来在急诊室精神科实施同伴支持的策略。关键词:定性研究,同伴支持,严重精神疾病患者,精神卫生工作者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信