Affordance Based Framework of Human Problem Solving: a Nonrepresentational Alternative

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY
Pankaj Singh
{"title":"Affordance Based Framework of Human Problem Solving: a Nonrepresentational Alternative","authors":"Pankaj Singh","doi":"10.24193/subbphil.2021.3.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem solving is a crucial higher-order thinking ability of humans. Humans' ability to solve problems is a critical higher-order thinking ability. Mathematical problem solving, analogical problem solving, complex problem solving, situated problem solving, and so on are all examples of problem solving. Furthermore, distinct types of research analysis, models, and theories are based on the mechanisms and elements involved in diverse problem-solving types. The conventional approach to understanding human problem solving is a representation-laden description, which is similar to most cognitive explanations of psychological processes. On the other hand, the paper goes beyond representational theories and models to investigate nonrepresentational and situated aspects of human problem solving. Problem solving is a crucial higher-order thinking ability of humans. The paper is a rudimentary attempt to present a nonrepresentational, Affordance-Situation-Attunement (ASA) framework of human problem solving. The aim is to invoke ASA as an alternative framework, in contrast with the dominant representational explanation of human problem solving. The aim is not to disparage the representational theories and models of problem solving but to contribute a nonrepresentational working framework and elements for highlighting the situated nature of human problem solving. Keywords: Problem solving, affordances, embodied cognition, situated cognition, ecological psychology","PeriodicalId":40516,"journal":{"name":"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Philosophia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Philosophia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphil.2021.3.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Problem solving is a crucial higher-order thinking ability of humans. Humans' ability to solve problems is a critical higher-order thinking ability. Mathematical problem solving, analogical problem solving, complex problem solving, situated problem solving, and so on are all examples of problem solving. Furthermore, distinct types of research analysis, models, and theories are based on the mechanisms and elements involved in diverse problem-solving types. The conventional approach to understanding human problem solving is a representation-laden description, which is similar to most cognitive explanations of psychological processes. On the other hand, the paper goes beyond representational theories and models to investigate nonrepresentational and situated aspects of human problem solving. Problem solving is a crucial higher-order thinking ability of humans. The paper is a rudimentary attempt to present a nonrepresentational, Affordance-Situation-Attunement (ASA) framework of human problem solving. The aim is to invoke ASA as an alternative framework, in contrast with the dominant representational explanation of human problem solving. The aim is not to disparage the representational theories and models of problem solving but to contribute a nonrepresentational working framework and elements for highlighting the situated nature of human problem solving. Keywords: Problem solving, affordances, embodied cognition, situated cognition, ecological psychology
基于支付能力的人类问题解决框架:一种非代表性的选择
解决问题是人类重要的高阶思维能力。人类解决问题的能力是一种重要的高阶思维能力。数学问题解决、类比问题解决、复杂问题解决、情境问题解决等等都是问题解决的例子。此外,不同类型的研究分析、模型和理论都是基于不同问题解决类型所涉及的机制和要素。理解人类解决问题的传统方法是充满表征的描述,这与大多数对心理过程的认知解释相似。另一方面,本文超越了表征理论和模型,研究了人类问题解决的非表征和情境方面。解决问题是人类重要的高阶思维能力。这篇论文是提出一个非代表性的、可承受的人类问题解决情境调整(ASA)框架的初步尝试。其目的是将ASA作为一种替代框架,与人类问题解决的主要代表性解释形成对比。其目的不是贬低问题解决的代表性理论和模型,而是提供一个非代表性的工作框架和元素,以突出人类问题解决的情境性质。关键词:问题解决、可供性、具体认知、情境认知、生态心理学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信