What Do We Tell the Drivers? Toward Minimum Driver Training Standards for Partially Automated Cars

IF 2.2 Q3 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
S. Casner, E. Hutchins
{"title":"What Do We Tell the Drivers? Toward Minimum Driver Training Standards for Partially Automated Cars","authors":"S. Casner, E. Hutchins","doi":"10.1177/1555343419830901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Each year, millions of automobile crashes occur when drivers fail to notice and respond to conflicts with other vehicles, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Today, manufacturers race to deploy automation technologies to help eliminate these mishaps. To date, little effort has been made to educate drivers about how these systems work or how they affect driver behavior. Driver education for automated systems amounts to additional pages in an owner’s manual that is known to be a seldom-used glove box reference. In this article, we review the history of automation deployed in the airline cockpit decades ago. We describe how automation helped avoid many common crash scenarios but at the same time gave rise to new kinds of crashes. It was only following a concerted effort to educate pilots about the automation, about themselves, and about the concept of a human-automation team that we reached the near-zero crash rate we enjoy today. Drawing parallels between the automation systems, the available pilot and driver research, and operational experience in both airplanes and automobiles, we outline knowledge standards for drivers of partially automated cars and argue that the safe operation of these vehicles will be enhanced by drivers’ incorporation of this knowledge in their everyday travels.","PeriodicalId":46342,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","volume":"13 1","pages":"55 - 66"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1555343419830901","citationCount":"39","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1555343419830901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39

Abstract

Each year, millions of automobile crashes occur when drivers fail to notice and respond to conflicts with other vehicles, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Today, manufacturers race to deploy automation technologies to help eliminate these mishaps. To date, little effort has been made to educate drivers about how these systems work or how they affect driver behavior. Driver education for automated systems amounts to additional pages in an owner’s manual that is known to be a seldom-used glove box reference. In this article, we review the history of automation deployed in the airline cockpit decades ago. We describe how automation helped avoid many common crash scenarios but at the same time gave rise to new kinds of crashes. It was only following a concerted effort to educate pilots about the automation, about themselves, and about the concept of a human-automation team that we reached the near-zero crash rate we enjoy today. Drawing parallels between the automation systems, the available pilot and driver research, and operational experience in both airplanes and automobiles, we outline knowledge standards for drivers of partially automated cars and argue that the safe operation of these vehicles will be enhanced by drivers’ incorporation of this knowledge in their everyday travels.
我们该怎么告诉司机?面向部分自动驾驶汽车的最低驾驶员培训标准
每年,当司机没有注意到并对与其他车辆、骑自行车的人和行人的冲突做出反应时,就会发生数百万起车祸。如今,制造商竞相部署自动化技术来帮助消除这些事故。到目前为止,几乎没有人努力教育驾驶员这些系统是如何工作的,或者它们是如何影响驾驶员行为的。自动化系统的驾驶员教育相当于车主手册中的额外页面,而车主手册是一个很少使用的手套箱参考资料。在这篇文章中,我们回顾了几十年前在航空公司驾驶舱部署自动化的历史。我们描述了自动化如何帮助避免许多常见的崩溃场景,但同时又引发了新类型的崩溃。只有在共同努力教育飞行员了解自动化、他们自己以及人类自动化团队的概念之后,我们才达到了今天接近零的坠机率。将自动化系统、可用的飞行员和驾驶员研究以及飞机和汽车的操作经验进行比较,我们概述了部分自动化汽车驾驶员的知识标准,并认为驾驶员在日常旅行中融入这些知识将增强这些车辆的安全操作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信