Role of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio in the Prognosis of Acute Ischaemic Stroke After Reperfusion Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IF 2.6 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Divyansh Sharma, K. Spring, S. Bhaskar
{"title":"Role of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio in the Prognosis of Acute Ischaemic Stroke After Reperfusion Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"Divyansh Sharma, K. Spring, S. Bhaskar","doi":"10.1177/11795735221092518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Inflammation may mediate response to acute reperfusion therapy (RT) in acute cerebral ischaemia. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), an inflammatory biomarker, may play an important role in acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) prognostication. Objective This meta-analysis sought to examine the effect of NLR on functional outcomes, mortality and adverse outcomes in AIS patients receiving RT. Methods Individual studies were retrieved from PubMed/Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. Data were extracted using a standardised data sheet and meta-analysis on association of admission (pre-RT) or delayed (post-RT) NLR with clinical/safety outcomes after RT was conducted. Results Thirty-five studies (n = 10 308) were identified for the systematic review with 27 (n = 8537) included in the meta-analyses. Lower admission NLR was associated with good functional outcomes (GFOs), defined as 3-month modified Rankin scale (mRS) 0–2 (SMD = −.46; 95% CI = −.62 to −.29; P < .0001), mRS 0–1 (SMD = −.44; 95% CI = −.66 to −.22; P < .0001) and early neurological improvement (ENI) (SMD = −.55; 95 %CI = −.84 to −.25; P < .0001). Lower delayed admission NLR was also associated with GFOs (SMD = −.80; 95%CI = −.91 to −.68; P < .0001). Higher admission NLR was significantly associated with mortality (SMD = .49; 95%CI = .12 to .85; P = .009), intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) (SMD = .34; 95% CI = .09 to .59; P = .007), symptomatic ICH (sICH) (SMD = .48; 95% CI = .07 to .90; P = .022) and stroke-associated infection or pneumonia (SMD = .85; 95% CI = .50, 1.19; P < .0001). Higher delayed NLR was significantly associated with sICH (SMD = 1.40; 95% CI = .60 to 2.19; P = .001), ICH (SMD = .94; 95% CI = .41 to 1.46; P < .0001) and mortality (SMD = 1.12; 95% CI = .57 to 1.67; P < .0001). There were variations in outcomes across RT groups. Conclusion Higher admission or delayed NLR is significantly associated with worse morbidity, mortality and safety outcomes in AIS patients receiving RT.","PeriodicalId":15218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Central Nervous System Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Central Nervous System Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11795735221092518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Background Inflammation may mediate response to acute reperfusion therapy (RT) in acute cerebral ischaemia. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), an inflammatory biomarker, may play an important role in acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) prognostication. Objective This meta-analysis sought to examine the effect of NLR on functional outcomes, mortality and adverse outcomes in AIS patients receiving RT. Methods Individual studies were retrieved from PubMed/Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. Data were extracted using a standardised data sheet and meta-analysis on association of admission (pre-RT) or delayed (post-RT) NLR with clinical/safety outcomes after RT was conducted. Results Thirty-five studies (n = 10 308) were identified for the systematic review with 27 (n = 8537) included in the meta-analyses. Lower admission NLR was associated with good functional outcomes (GFOs), defined as 3-month modified Rankin scale (mRS) 0–2 (SMD = −.46; 95% CI = −.62 to −.29; P < .0001), mRS 0–1 (SMD = −.44; 95% CI = −.66 to −.22; P < .0001) and early neurological improvement (ENI) (SMD = −.55; 95 %CI = −.84 to −.25; P < .0001). Lower delayed admission NLR was also associated with GFOs (SMD = −.80; 95%CI = −.91 to −.68; P < .0001). Higher admission NLR was significantly associated with mortality (SMD = .49; 95%CI = .12 to .85; P = .009), intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) (SMD = .34; 95% CI = .09 to .59; P = .007), symptomatic ICH (sICH) (SMD = .48; 95% CI = .07 to .90; P = .022) and stroke-associated infection or pneumonia (SMD = .85; 95% CI = .50, 1.19; P < .0001). Higher delayed NLR was significantly associated with sICH (SMD = 1.40; 95% CI = .60 to 2.19; P = .001), ICH (SMD = .94; 95% CI = .41 to 1.46; P < .0001) and mortality (SMD = 1.12; 95% CI = .57 to 1.67; P < .0001). There were variations in outcomes across RT groups. Conclusion Higher admission or delayed NLR is significantly associated with worse morbidity, mortality and safety outcomes in AIS patients receiving RT.
中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比率在急性缺血性脑卒中再灌注治疗后预后中的作用:系统评价和荟萃分析
背景炎症可能介导急性脑缺血对急性再灌注治疗(RT)的反应。中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比率(NLR)是一种炎症生物标志物,可能在急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)的预后中发挥重要作用。目的本荟萃分析旨在检验NLR对接受RT的AIS患者的功能结果、死亡率和不良结果的影响。方法从PubMed/Medline、EMBASE和Cochrane数据库中检索个体研究。使用标准化数据表和荟萃分析提取数据,研究入院(放疗前)或延迟(放疗后)NLR与放疗后临床/安全性结果的关系。结果35项研究(n=10 308)被确定为系统综述,其中27项(n=8537)被纳入荟萃分析。较低的入院NLR与良好的功能结果(GFO)相关,定义为3个月的改良兰金量表(mRS)0-2(SMD=−.46;95%CI=−.62至−.29;P<.0001),mRS 0–1(SMD=−.44;95%CI=−.66至−.22;P<.0001)和早期神经系统改善(ENI)(SMD=−.55;95%CI=−.84至−.25;P<0.0001)。较低的延迟入院NLR也与GFO相关(SMD=−.80;95%CI=−.91至−.68;P<.001)。较高的入院NLR与死亡率显著相关(SMD=.49;95%CI=0.12至.85;P=.009),脑出血(ICH)(SMD=.34;95%CI=0.09至.59;P=0.007)、症状性ICH(sICH)(SMD=.48;95%CI=0.07至.90;P=0.022)和中风相关感染或肺炎(SMD=.85;95%CI=0.501.19;P<.0001)。较高的延迟NLR与sICH显著相关(SMD=1.40;95%CI=0.60至2.19;P=0.001),ICH(SMD=.94;95%CI=.41至1.46;P<.0001)和死亡率(SMD=1.12;95%CI=.57至1.67;P<0.0001)。RT组的结果存在差异。结论在接受RT的AIS患者中,较高的入院率或延迟的NLR与较差的发病率、死亡率和安全性结果显著相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信