From awareness to activism: Understanding commitment to social justice in higher education

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
L. Howard, A. Statham, Erin E. Gilles, M. R. Roberts, Wendy G. Turner
{"title":"From awareness to activism: Understanding commitment to social justice in higher education","authors":"L. Howard, A. Statham, Erin E. Gilles, M. R. Roberts, Wendy G. Turner","doi":"10.1177/17461979221136506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we examine the concept of social justice to provide greater clarity about how higher education might help students achieve more understanding about social justice and develop behaviors consistent with social change. We measured three dimensions of social justice: students’ recognition that inequality exists, their determination to do something, and their willingness to engage in actions that reduce inequality. Mean differences in scales tapping these views between students in introductory and capstone courses in six liberal arts disciplines—social work, sociology, psychology, criminal justice, gender studies, and communication—suggest variations in how students in these programs commit to social change. Capstone students consistently showed greater commitment to social justice compared to freshmen students. The most significant differences occurred in their willingness to take action. Patterns differed significantly within the six disciplines, and consideration is given to the emphasis placed on social justice within the six disciplines, as partially explaining the differences. These results suggest some modification to the notion in the literature that a ‘principal-implementation’ gap exists among adults in their commitment to social justice that tends to increase with maturation.","PeriodicalId":45472,"journal":{"name":"Education Citizenship and Social Justice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Citizenship and Social Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17461979221136506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this study, we examine the concept of social justice to provide greater clarity about how higher education might help students achieve more understanding about social justice and develop behaviors consistent with social change. We measured three dimensions of social justice: students’ recognition that inequality exists, their determination to do something, and their willingness to engage in actions that reduce inequality. Mean differences in scales tapping these views between students in introductory and capstone courses in six liberal arts disciplines—social work, sociology, psychology, criminal justice, gender studies, and communication—suggest variations in how students in these programs commit to social change. Capstone students consistently showed greater commitment to social justice compared to freshmen students. The most significant differences occurred in their willingness to take action. Patterns differed significantly within the six disciplines, and consideration is given to the emphasis placed on social justice within the six disciplines, as partially explaining the differences. These results suggest some modification to the notion in the literature that a ‘principal-implementation’ gap exists among adults in their commitment to social justice that tends to increase with maturation.
从意识到行动主义:理解高等教育对社会正义的承诺
在这项研究中,我们考察了社会正义的概念,以更清楚地了解高等教育如何帮助学生更好地理解社会正义,并发展与社会变革相一致的行为。我们测量了社会正义的三个维度:学生对不平等存在的认识,他们做某事的决心,以及他们参与减少不平等行动的意愿。在社会工作、社会学、心理学、刑事司法、性别研究和传播学这六个文科学科的入门课程和压轴课程中,利用这些观点的学生在量表上的平均差异表明,这些课程中的学生在致力于社会变革的方式上存在差异。与大一学生相比,顶尖学生一贯表现出对社会正义的更大承诺。最显著的差异出现在他们采取行动的意愿上。六个学科中的模式差异很大,并考虑到六个学科对社会正义的重视,作为部分解释差异的原因。这些结果表明,对文献中的观点进行了一些修改,即成年人对社会正义的承诺存在“主要执行”差距,这种差距往往随着成熟而增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Education Citizenship and Social Justice
Education Citizenship and Social Justice EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
16.70%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信