Augmented-Reality Enhanced Anatomy Learning (A-REAL): Assessing the utility of 3D holographic models for anatomy education

Q3 Medicine
Jesus Uribe , Derek Harmon , Benjamin Laguna , Jesse Courtier
{"title":"Augmented-Reality Enhanced Anatomy Learning (A-REAL): Assessing the utility of 3D holographic models for anatomy education","authors":"Jesus Uribe ,&nbsp;Derek Harmon ,&nbsp;Benjamin Laguna ,&nbsp;Jesse Courtier","doi":"10.1016/j.stlm.2022.100090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As anatomy lab hours have been decreased across medical school curricula, there is opportunity for Augmented Reality (AR) to emerge as an effective learning tool. In addition to live demonstrations such as those provided through the Peer Teaching Program (PTP), AR technology can provide 3-D realistic anatomic imaging that engages visuospatial skills and can be accessed remotely, The goal of this study is to provide an assessment of AR holograms as an educational intervention for anatomy learning. The study was quasi-experimental in design to determine the efficacy of AR compared to PTP. Two trials took place during regularly scheduled PTP sessions. For the AR intervention, students completed a pretest, interacted with AR holograms as either the 1st (AR1) or 2nd (AR2) educational intervention, then completed a posttest. A paired-t test was used on AR1 scores to determine AR efficacy. A one-sided MannWhitney-U test was used on post-intervention scores of AR1 vs PTP1. The AR1 group achieved a significant improvement in test scores. There was no significant difference in AR1 vs PTP1 post-intervention scores. CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, mobile-based AR was as effective as PTP in acquiring short-term learning and has the potential to be used for anatomy education to simulate hands-on laboratory time</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72210,"journal":{"name":"Annals of 3D printed medicine","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100090"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of 3D printed medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666964122000443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

As anatomy lab hours have been decreased across medical school curricula, there is opportunity for Augmented Reality (AR) to emerge as an effective learning tool. In addition to live demonstrations such as those provided through the Peer Teaching Program (PTP), AR technology can provide 3-D realistic anatomic imaging that engages visuospatial skills and can be accessed remotely, The goal of this study is to provide an assessment of AR holograms as an educational intervention for anatomy learning. The study was quasi-experimental in design to determine the efficacy of AR compared to PTP. Two trials took place during regularly scheduled PTP sessions. For the AR intervention, students completed a pretest, interacted with AR holograms as either the 1st (AR1) or 2nd (AR2) educational intervention, then completed a posttest. A paired-t test was used on AR1 scores to determine AR efficacy. A one-sided MannWhitney-U test was used on post-intervention scores of AR1 vs PTP1. The AR1 group achieved a significant improvement in test scores. There was no significant difference in AR1 vs PTP1 post-intervention scores. CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, mobile-based AR was as effective as PTP in acquiring short-term learning and has the potential to be used for anatomy education to simulate hands-on laboratory time

增强现实增强解剖学学习(A-REAL):评估3D全息模型在解剖学教育中的效用
随着医学院课程中解剖实验室时间的减少,增强现实(AR)有机会成为一种有效的学习工具。除了通过同伴教学计划(PTP)提供的现场演示外,AR技术还可以提供3d逼真的解剖成像,该成像涉及视觉空间技能,并且可以远程访问。本研究的目的是提供AR全息图作为解剖学习教育干预的评估。该研究在设计上是准实验的,目的是确定AR与PTP的疗效。在定期安排的PTP会议期间进行了两次试验。对于增强现实干预,学生完成了前测,与增强现实全息图互动,作为第一(AR1)或第二(AR2)教育干预,然后完成后测。AR1评分采用配对t检验确定AR疗效。干预后AR1与PTP1评分采用单侧MannWhitney-U检验。AR1组在考试成绩上取得了显著的进步。干预后AR1与PTP1评分无显著差异。结论:在这项初步研究中,基于移动设备的AR在获得短期学习方面与PTP一样有效,并且有可能用于模拟动手实验室时间的解剖学教育
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of 3D printed medicine
Annals of 3D printed medicine Medicine and Dentistry (General), Materials Science (General)
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
131 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信