Criticism of Western Modernization in Russian Thought and Its Consonance to Modernity

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Chen Yuling, Teng Yanjiao
{"title":"Criticism of Western Modernization in Russian Thought and Its Consonance to Modernity","authors":"Chen Yuling, Teng Yanjiao","doi":"10.21146/0042-8744-2023-3-47-57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the process of globalization, western countries represented by the United States and the United Kingdom have been advocating the so-called “universal” development mode. In response to western modernization, there has always been a “counter-enlightenment” trend in Russia’s cultural tradition. The fight between Slavophils and Western faction is not only a choice between two development paths, but also a confrontation between two civilizations. After the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the failure of shock therapy, traditional Russian thought has received renewed attention in contemporary times facing the current devel­opment status of Russia. Attempts have been made to construct a civilization with Russian national characteristics, so as to surpass the development of West­ern capital modernity. The works of Vladimir S. Soloviev, Nikolai A. Berdyaev, Nikolai Ya. Danilevsky formulate both the discrepancies between the founda­tions of Russian culture and the models of Westernization introduced from out­side, as well as the general principles of preserving cultural diversity in the world; many of their ideas find support and continuation in the works of modern Rus­sian philosophers, including Andrey V. Smirnov. There are some commonalities between the “Russian reflection” on Western modernization and the “Chinese wisdom” that China is now building.","PeriodicalId":46795,"journal":{"name":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2023-3-47-57","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the process of globalization, western countries represented by the United States and the United Kingdom have been advocating the so-called “universal” development mode. In response to western modernization, there has always been a “counter-enlightenment” trend in Russia’s cultural tradition. The fight between Slavophils and Western faction is not only a choice between two development paths, but also a confrontation between two civilizations. After the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the failure of shock therapy, traditional Russian thought has received renewed attention in contemporary times facing the current devel­opment status of Russia. Attempts have been made to construct a civilization with Russian national characteristics, so as to surpass the development of West­ern capital modernity. The works of Vladimir S. Soloviev, Nikolai A. Berdyaev, Nikolai Ya. Danilevsky formulate both the discrepancies between the founda­tions of Russian culture and the models of Westernization introduced from out­side, as well as the general principles of preserving cultural diversity in the world; many of their ideas find support and continuation in the works of modern Rus­sian philosophers, including Andrey V. Smirnov. There are some commonalities between the “Russian reflection” on Western modernization and the “Chinese wisdom” that China is now building.
俄罗斯思想对西方现代化的批判及其与现代性的契合
在全球化进程中,以美国和英国为代表的西方国家一直在倡导所谓的“普遍”发展模式。为了回应西方的现代化,俄罗斯的文化传统中一直存在着“反启蒙”的趋势。亲斯拉夫派与西方派系的斗争既是两种发展道路之间的选择,也是两种文明之间的对抗。在苏联解体和休克疗法失败后,面对俄罗斯目前的发展状况,俄罗斯传统思想在当代重新受到关注。试图构建具有俄罗斯民族特色的文明,以超越西方资本现代性的发展。弗拉基米尔·S·索洛维耶夫、尼古拉·贝尔德亚耶夫、尼古拉·亚的作品。达尼列夫斯基阐述了俄罗斯文化基础与外来西方化模式之间的差异,以及保护世界文化多样性的一般原则;他们的许多思想在包括安德烈·斯米尔诺夫在内的现代俄罗斯哲学家的作品中得到了支持和延续。俄罗斯对西方现代化的“反思”和中国正在建设的“中国智慧”之间有一些共同点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
VOPROSY FILOSOFII
VOPROSY FILOSOFII PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: "Вопросы философии" - академическое научное издание, центральный философский журнал в России. В настоящее время является органом Президиума Российской Академии Наук. Журнал "Вопросы философии" исторически тесно связан с Институтом философии РАН. Выходит ежемесячно. Журнал был основан в июле 1947 г. Интернет-версия журнала запущена в мае 2009 года.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信