Is God a Phenomenon? A dialogue between Kierkegaard and Jean-Luc Marion

Wellington José Santana
{"title":"Is God a Phenomenon? A dialogue between Kierkegaard and Jean-Luc Marion","authors":"Wellington José Santana","doi":"10.5216/phi.v24i2.47183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present article analyses critically the paradox of phenomenon claimed by Danish Philosopher Kierkegaard and Marion’s new concept named saturated phenomenon. While the concept of God, by definition, must surpass the realm of empiricism, perhaps the something may shed light over what God must be: Excess. However, Marion developed a new concept of phenomenon that not only occupies the immanence world, but also goes beyond. It is called saturated phenomenon. In order to address the question one might understand the limit of the givenness and then what does it mean saturated givenness. We probably all have had the sense of being overwhelmed by something and this can lead toward a sense of torpor or numbness. In the other hand, Kierkegaard affirms that God is so different than a human being, so totally other that we may think we’re right in demanding God make himself understood and be reasonable towards us. Kierkegaard upholds that we’re always dealing with God in the wrong way. I will argue that Marion, however, following phenomenological footsteps indicates a new path toward how to address God properly. \n  \nKey words: Paradox; Saturated phenomenon; freedom; Excess.","PeriodicalId":30368,"journal":{"name":"Philosophos Revista de Filosofia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophos Revista de Filosofia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5216/phi.v24i2.47183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present article analyses critically the paradox of phenomenon claimed by Danish Philosopher Kierkegaard and Marion’s new concept named saturated phenomenon. While the concept of God, by definition, must surpass the realm of empiricism, perhaps the something may shed light over what God must be: Excess. However, Marion developed a new concept of phenomenon that not only occupies the immanence world, but also goes beyond. It is called saturated phenomenon. In order to address the question one might understand the limit of the givenness and then what does it mean saturated givenness. We probably all have had the sense of being overwhelmed by something and this can lead toward a sense of torpor or numbness. In the other hand, Kierkegaard affirms that God is so different than a human being, so totally other that we may think we’re right in demanding God make himself understood and be reasonable towards us. Kierkegaard upholds that we’re always dealing with God in the wrong way. I will argue that Marion, however, following phenomenological footsteps indicates a new path toward how to address God properly.   Key words: Paradox; Saturated phenomenon; freedom; Excess.
上帝是一种现象吗?克尔凯郭尔与让-吕克·马里恩的对话
本文对丹麦哲学家克尔凯郭尔提出的现象悖论和马里昂提出的饱和现象新概念进行了批判性分析。虽然从定义上讲,上帝的概念必须超越经验主义的范畴,但也许这件事可以揭示上帝必须是什么:过度。然而,马里昂发展了一种新的现象观,这种现象不仅占据了内在世界,而且超越了内在世界。它被称为饱和现象。为了解决这个问题,人们可能会理解给予的极限,然后它意味着饱和给予。我们可能都有被某事淹没的感觉,这可能会导致麻木或麻木的感觉。另一方面,克尔凯郭尔肯定上帝与人是如此不同,如此完全不同,以至于我们可能认为我们要求上帝理解他自己并对我们讲道理是正确的。然而,我认为马里昂追随现象学的脚步,指明了一条通往如何正确称呼上帝的新道路。关键词:悖论;饱和现象;自由过量的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信