Questions and Answers to Antiochus the Duke in the South-Slavic and Russian Traditions: Manuscripts from 14th–15th Centuries with Lestvitsa (The Ladder of Divine Ascent) of John Climacus

IF 0.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Viacheslav V. Lytvynenko, I. Gritsevskaya
{"title":"Questions and Answers to Antiochus the Duke in the South-Slavic and Russian Traditions: Manuscripts from 14th–15th Centuries with Lestvitsa (The Ladder of Divine Ascent) of John Climacus","authors":"Viacheslav V. Lytvynenko, I. Gritsevskaya","doi":"10.59076/2603-2899.2023.2.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the Pseudo-Athanasian writing Questions and Answers to Antiochus the Duke in the South-Slavic and Russian traditions in the 14th–15th centuries. The authors provide a brief overview of the research on the early history of the text and interact with the conclusions by W. R. Veder and L. Sels who distinguish two main groups of manuscripts and two versions of the text, respectively. The authors raise the problem of limited textual material and lack of understanding of the manuscript tradition, which often goes with the tendency of scholars to approach this writing without a proper historical perspective on its spread in the Slavic lands. As a way of contributing to the solution of this problem, the authors propose to introduce into the scientific circulation three new manuscripts of the Questions and Answers from the 14th–15th centuries, based on the research of T. G. Popova, who designated these manuscripts as those who contain the Lestvitsa (The Ladder of Divine Ascent) of John Climacus. The bulk of the article examines these manuscripts, their specific features and redactions in relation to the textual groups I and II. At the end of the article, the authors draw important conclusions concerning the early spread of the Questions and Answers as they were transmitted together with Lestvitsa.","PeriodicalId":52013,"journal":{"name":"Palaeobulgarica-Starobalgaristika","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palaeobulgarica-Starobalgaristika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59076/2603-2899.2023.2.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores the Pseudo-Athanasian writing Questions and Answers to Antiochus the Duke in the South-Slavic and Russian traditions in the 14th–15th centuries. The authors provide a brief overview of the research on the early history of the text and interact with the conclusions by W. R. Veder and L. Sels who distinguish two main groups of manuscripts and two versions of the text, respectively. The authors raise the problem of limited textual material and lack of understanding of the manuscript tradition, which often goes with the tendency of scholars to approach this writing without a proper historical perspective on its spread in the Slavic lands. As a way of contributing to the solution of this problem, the authors propose to introduce into the scientific circulation three new manuscripts of the Questions and Answers from the 14th–15th centuries, based on the research of T. G. Popova, who designated these manuscripts as those who contain the Lestvitsa (The Ladder of Divine Ascent) of John Climacus. The bulk of the article examines these manuscripts, their specific features and redactions in relation to the textual groups I and II. At the end of the article, the authors draw important conclusions concerning the early spread of the Questions and Answers as they were transmitted together with Lestvitsa.
南斯拉夫和俄罗斯传统中对安条克公爵的问答:14至15世纪与约翰·克里马库斯的《神圣上升的阶梯》手稿
本文探讨了14—15世纪南斯拉夫和俄罗斯传统中伪亚他那派作家对安条克公爵的问答。作者简要概述了对文本早期历史的研究,并与W.R.Veder和L.Sels的结论进行了互动,他们分别区分了两组主要手稿和文本的两个版本。作者提出了文本材料有限和缺乏对手稿传统的理解的问题,这往往与学者们在处理这篇文章时对其在斯拉夫土地上的传播缺乏适当的历史视角的倾向相一致。为了帮助解决这个问题,作者建议在科学流通中引入三份14至15世纪的《问答》新手稿,这三份手稿是基于T·G·波波娃的研究,波波娃将这些手稿指定为包含约翰·克里马库斯的《神圣上升的阶梯》的手稿。文章的大部分内容考察了这些手稿,它们的具体特征以及与第一和第二文本组相关的编辑。在文章的最后,作者得出了关于问答的早期传播的重要结论,因为它们与Lestvitsa一起传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palaeobulgarica-Starobalgaristika
Palaeobulgarica-Starobalgaristika HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
75.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信