Comparison of Prognostic Value Between Stimulated and Nonstimulated Thyroglobulins in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Retrospective Study.

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-03 DOI:10.1007/s13139-023-00811-8
Junik Son, Chae Moon Hong, Do-Hoon Kim, Shin Young Jeong, Sang-Woo Lee, Jaetae Lee, Byeong-Cheol Ahn
{"title":"Comparison of Prognostic Value Between Stimulated and Nonstimulated Thyroglobulins in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Junik Son, Chae Moon Hong, Do-Hoon Kim, Shin Young Jeong, Sang-Woo Lee, Jaetae Lee, Byeong-Cheol Ahn","doi":"10.1007/s13139-023-00811-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The growing incidence of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) demands dependable prognostic factors to guide follow-up and treatment plans. This study investigated the prognostic value of response to therapy (RTT) assessment using TSH stimulated-thyroglobulin (sti-Tg) and nonstimulated-thyroglobulin (nonsti-Tg) and evaluates whether RTT using nonsti-Tg (nonstiRTT) can replace RTT using sti-Tg (stiRTT) in clinical practice to improve patients' quality of life during assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 419 DTC patients who underwent total thyroidectomy, radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy, and Tg assessment. Patients with structural incomplete responses were excluded. Initial RTT assessments based on the 2015 American Thyroid Association guidelines (excellent response; ER, indeterminate response, biochemical incomplete response) were performed 6-24 months after RAI therapy. The second RTT assessments were performed 6-24 months after the first assessment. Statistical analysis for recurrence-free survival (RFS) was done with the log-rank test for stiRTT and nonstiRTT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although initial stiRTT and nonstiRTT were significant predictors for RFS (p < 0.0001), stiRTT provided better RFS prediction than nonstiRTT. The RFS analysis of the second RTT assessment demonstrated statistical significance only for stiRTT (p < 0.0001). In 116 patients classified as ER on initial stiRTT, there was no RFS difference between patients classified as ER on either second stiRTT or nonstiRTT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prognostic power of stiRTT surpasses that of nonstiRTT in both the initial and second RTT assessment. Nevertheless, among patients classified as ER on initial stiRTT, a second stiRTT may not be required for those classified as ER on the second nonstiRTT.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13139-023-00811-8.</p>","PeriodicalId":19384,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10654278/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-023-00811-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The growing incidence of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) demands dependable prognostic factors to guide follow-up and treatment plans. This study investigated the prognostic value of response to therapy (RTT) assessment using TSH stimulated-thyroglobulin (sti-Tg) and nonstimulated-thyroglobulin (nonsti-Tg) and evaluates whether RTT using nonsti-Tg (nonstiRTT) can replace RTT using sti-Tg (stiRTT) in clinical practice to improve patients' quality of life during assessment.

Methods: We enrolled 419 DTC patients who underwent total thyroidectomy, radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy, and Tg assessment. Patients with structural incomplete responses were excluded. Initial RTT assessments based on the 2015 American Thyroid Association guidelines (excellent response; ER, indeterminate response, biochemical incomplete response) were performed 6-24 months after RAI therapy. The second RTT assessments were performed 6-24 months after the first assessment. Statistical analysis for recurrence-free survival (RFS) was done with the log-rank test for stiRTT and nonstiRTT.

Results: Although initial stiRTT and nonstiRTT were significant predictors for RFS (p < 0.0001), stiRTT provided better RFS prediction than nonstiRTT. The RFS analysis of the second RTT assessment demonstrated statistical significance only for stiRTT (p < 0.0001). In 116 patients classified as ER on initial stiRTT, there was no RFS difference between patients classified as ER on either second stiRTT or nonstiRTT.

Conclusion: The prognostic power of stiRTT surpasses that of nonstiRTT in both the initial and second RTT assessment. Nevertheless, among patients classified as ER on initial stiRTT, a second stiRTT may not be required for those classified as ER on the second nonstiRTT.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13139-023-00811-8.

受激与非受激甲状腺球蛋白对分化型甲状腺癌预后价值的比较:回顾性研究
目的:分化型甲状腺癌(DTC)的发病率不断上升,需要可靠的预后因素来指导随访和治疗计划。本研究探讨了TSH促甲状腺球蛋白(stii - tg)和非促甲状腺球蛋白(nonstii - tg)对治疗反应(RTT)评估的预后价值,并评估了在临床实践中使用非stii - tg (nonstiRTT)的RTT是否可以替代stii - tg (stiRTT)的RTT,以改善患者在评估期间的生活质量。方法:我们招募了419名接受甲状腺全切除术、放射性碘(RAI)治疗和Tg评估的DTC患者。排除结构不完全反应的患者。基于2015年美国甲状腺协会指南的初始RTT评估(反应优异;在RAI治疗后6-24个月进行ER、不确定缓解、生化不完全缓解。第二次RTT评估在第一次评估后6-24个月进行。对stiRTT和非stiRTT的无复发生存率(RFS)进行log-rank检验。结果:虽然初始stiRTT和非stiRTT是RFS的重要预测因子(p)。结论:在初始和第二次RTT评估中,stiRTT的预后能力都超过非stiRTT。然而,在首次stiRTT时被归类为ER的患者中,对于第二次非stiRTT时被归类为ER的患者可能不需要第二次stiRTT。补充信息:在线版本提供补充资料,网址为10.1007/s13139-023-00811-8。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (Nucl Med Mol Imaging) is an official journal of the Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine, which bimonthly publishes papers on February, April, June, August, October, and December about nuclear medicine and related sciences such as radiochemistry, radiopharmacy, dosimetry and pharmacokinetics / pharmacodynamics of radiopharmaceuticals, nuclear and molecular imaging analysis, nuclear and molecular imaging instrumentation, radiation biology and radionuclide therapy. The journal specially welcomes works of artificial intelligence applied to nuclear medicine. The journal will also welcome original works relating to molecular imaging research such as the development of molecular imaging probes, reporter imaging assays, imaging cell trafficking, imaging endo(exo)genous gene expression, and imaging signal transduction. Nucl Med Mol Imaging publishes the following types of papers: original articles, reviews, case reports, editorials, interesting images, and letters to the editor. The Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine (KSNM) KSNM is a scientific and professional organization founded in 1961 and a member of the Korean Academy of Medical Sciences of the Korean Medical Association which was established by The Medical Services Law. The aims of KSNM are the promotion of nuclear medicine and cooperation of each member. The business of KSNM includes holding academic meetings and symposia, the publication of journals and books, planning and research of promoting science and health, and training and qualification of nuclear medicine specialists.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信