Comparison of the Effect of Tetrapod Block and Armor X block on Reducing Wave Overtopping in Breakwaters

Omid Nourani, M. Askar
{"title":"Comparison of the Effect of Tetrapod Block and Armor X block on Reducing Wave Overtopping in Breakwaters","authors":"Omid Nourani, M. Askar","doi":"10.4236/OJMS.2017.74033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the Armor shape has a significant effect on the reduction of wave overtopping, \nthis study compares the performance of various shapes of concrete armored \nblocks of X block and Tetrapod as the most suitable armors. In this \nstudy, a three-dimensional numerical model was used for simulation of the \neffects of waves on the armors of Tetrapod and X Block breakwaters. In this \nregard, in order to calibrate the numerical model, a sample of conventional \nstone armor has been selected and using available experimental data on the \ndesign of armor such as wave overtopping, wave height, period of waves and \nenergy density of the required spectral range of wave verification was conducted \non a numerical model. In this regard, it is necessary to calibrate all the \nconditions of the model including boundary conditions, numerical modeling, \ninitial conditions, numerical solvers and other parameters in the numerical \nmodel and simulation error rate is determined. The maximum error of the \nnumerical model for the relative height values of the impact waves on the \nstructure of breakwater is 7.87% for different conditions. Accordingly, the \nmaximum error of the numerical model in determining overtopping values is \n7.81%. The average fluctuation value of overtopping in the X block armor has \ndropped by about 31% compared to the tetrapod armor.","PeriodicalId":65849,"journal":{"name":"海洋科学期刊(英文)","volume":"07 1","pages":"472-484"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"海洋科学期刊(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/OJMS.2017.74033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

As the Armor shape has a significant effect on the reduction of wave overtopping, this study compares the performance of various shapes of concrete armored blocks of X block and Tetrapod as the most suitable armors. In this study, a three-dimensional numerical model was used for simulation of the effects of waves on the armors of Tetrapod and X Block breakwaters. In this regard, in order to calibrate the numerical model, a sample of conventional stone armor has been selected and using available experimental data on the design of armor such as wave overtopping, wave height, period of waves and energy density of the required spectral range of wave verification was conducted on a numerical model. In this regard, it is necessary to calibrate all the conditions of the model including boundary conditions, numerical modeling, initial conditions, numerical solvers and other parameters in the numerical model and simulation error rate is determined. The maximum error of the numerical model for the relative height values of the impact waves on the structure of breakwater is 7.87% for different conditions. Accordingly, the maximum error of the numerical model in determining overtopping values is 7.81%. The average fluctuation value of overtopping in the X block armor has dropped by about 31% compared to the tetrapod armor.
四脚形挡块和X形挡块减少防波堤波浪倾覆的效果比较
由于装甲形状对减少波浪漫顶有显著影响,本研究比较了X块和Tetrapod作为最合适的装甲的各种形状的混凝土装甲块的性能。在本研究中,使用三维数值模型模拟了波浪对Tetrapod和X Block防波堤护面的影响。在这方面,为了校准数值模型,选择了一个传统石制装甲的样本,并利用现有的装甲设计实验数据,如波浪漫顶、波浪高度、波浪周期和波浪所需光谱范围的能量密度,对数值模型进行了验证。在这方面,有必要校准模型的所有条件,包括边界条件、数值建模、初始条件、数值求解器和数值模型中的其他参数,并确定模拟误差率。不同条件下,数值模型对防波堤结构冲击波相对高度值的最大误差为7.87%。因此,数值模型在确定漫顶值时的最大误差为7.81%。与四足装甲相比,X块装甲的漫顶平均波动值下降了约31%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
224
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信