Specifying the literacy pedagogy moves through genre-based instruction for advanced second language teaching: developing multiple literacies through systemic functional linguistics

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Marianna Ryshina-Pankova, D. Mcknight
{"title":"Specifying the literacy pedagogy moves through genre-based instruction for advanced second language teaching: developing multiple literacies through systemic functional linguistics","authors":"Marianna Ryshina-Pankova, D. Mcknight","doi":"10.1080/1554480X.2022.2077339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT While the multiliteracies framework proposed two decades ago has had a considerable effect on the field of second language (L2) teaching and learning, its successful implementation has been found challenging, both on the conceptual and practical levels. In this paper, we discuss the main hurdles of putting the approach into practice and argue for the use of the genre-based instruction in combination with key constructs of systemic functional linguistics (SFL) as a framework that can help address these challenges. Connecting the multiliteracies pedagogy with the genre-based approach, we delineate specifically how the literacy pedagogy moves and knowledge processes that constitute them can be implemented in content- and language-integrated L2 instruction. We illustrate the approach by reporting on the materials development project that focuses on a particular public discourse theme (banning the burka in Austria) and advanced literacy genre (Argumentative Discussion). The project serves as an example of formulating the advanced L2 learning goals and designing activity types that can be used for developing the multiliteracies curricula in other instructional and thematic contexts.","PeriodicalId":45770,"journal":{"name":"Pedagogies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedagogies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2022.2077339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT While the multiliteracies framework proposed two decades ago has had a considerable effect on the field of second language (L2) teaching and learning, its successful implementation has been found challenging, both on the conceptual and practical levels. In this paper, we discuss the main hurdles of putting the approach into practice and argue for the use of the genre-based instruction in combination with key constructs of systemic functional linguistics (SFL) as a framework that can help address these challenges. Connecting the multiliteracies pedagogy with the genre-based approach, we delineate specifically how the literacy pedagogy moves and knowledge processes that constitute them can be implemented in content- and language-integrated L2 instruction. We illustrate the approach by reporting on the materials development project that focuses on a particular public discourse theme (banning the burka in Austria) and advanced literacy genre (Argumentative Discussion). The project serves as an example of formulating the advanced L2 learning goals and designing activity types that can be used for developing the multiliteracies curricula in other instructional and thematic contexts.
明确以体裁为基础的读写教学法在高级第二语言教学中的应用:通过系统功能语言学发展多种读写能力
摘要尽管二十年前提出的多语篇框架在第二语言教学领域产生了相当大的影响,但它的成功实施在概念和实践层面都具有挑战性。在本文中,我们讨论了将该方法付诸实践的主要障碍,并主张将基于类型的教学与系统功能语言学(SFL)的关键结构相结合,作为一个有助于解决这些挑战的框架。将多语篇教学法与基于体裁的方法联系起来,我们具体描述了识字教学法是如何运作的,以及构成识字教学法的知识过程如何在内容和语言综合的二语教学中实施。我们通过报道材料开发项目来说明这种方法,该项目侧重于特定的公共话语主题(在奥地利禁止穿罩袍)和高级识字类型(辩论讨论)。该项目是制定高级二语学习目标和设计活动类型的一个例子,可用于在其他教学和主题背景下开发多元课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pedagogies
Pedagogies EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信