Old Canaan in a New World: Native Americans and the lost tribes of Israel

IF 0.3 4区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY
R. Segev
{"title":"Old Canaan in a New World: Native Americans and the lost tribes of Israel","authors":"R. Segev","doi":"10.1080/00182370.2023.2230055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"that were inscribed in the social and political rules of Algerian, Tunisian, and Moroccan societies, and lastly by the persistence of corsairing in the Mediterranean. Such challenges are further analyzed in a third part, discussing developments between 1651 and 1683. A last part focuses on gift giving, and the apparent “cultural incommensurability” (160) between Maghrib and western European societies. Heinsen-Roach does well in pointing out that contemporary European commentaries on the inferior status of tributary relationships when compared to self-perceived European ideas on diplomatic ties fits within a developing discourse of European superiority, and the book is very successful in its attempt to steer away from the superiority discourse to arrive at a more nuanced history. The focus on the imprint left by the North African Regencies on European diplomatic developments is what makes the work interesting and important, but it also points to a common problem in studying history in or of the Islamic world in the early modern period – a lack of source material. The author relies on important primary source material, both published sources as well as archival documents – but these are all European. Preservation difficulties and linguistical barriers surely render the inclusion of North African and Ottoman material in the analysis complicated, but the ability to distill the Maghrib point of view more directly from such material – if available – would have provided even more evidence for Heinsen-Roach’s important claims.","PeriodicalId":44078,"journal":{"name":"HISTORIAN","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HISTORIAN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00182370.2023.2230055","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

that were inscribed in the social and political rules of Algerian, Tunisian, and Moroccan societies, and lastly by the persistence of corsairing in the Mediterranean. Such challenges are further analyzed in a third part, discussing developments between 1651 and 1683. A last part focuses on gift giving, and the apparent “cultural incommensurability” (160) between Maghrib and western European societies. Heinsen-Roach does well in pointing out that contemporary European commentaries on the inferior status of tributary relationships when compared to self-perceived European ideas on diplomatic ties fits within a developing discourse of European superiority, and the book is very successful in its attempt to steer away from the superiority discourse to arrive at a more nuanced history. The focus on the imprint left by the North African Regencies on European diplomatic developments is what makes the work interesting and important, but it also points to a common problem in studying history in or of the Islamic world in the early modern period – a lack of source material. The author relies on important primary source material, both published sources as well as archival documents – but these are all European. Preservation difficulties and linguistical barriers surely render the inclusion of North African and Ottoman material in the analysis complicated, but the ability to distill the Maghrib point of view more directly from such material – if available – would have provided even more evidence for Heinsen-Roach’s important claims.
新世界中的旧迦南:美洲原住民和以色列失落的部落
这些都被阿尔及利亚、突尼斯和摩洛哥社会的社会和政治规则所铭记,最后是地中海地区持续的海盗行为。第三部分进一步分析了这些挑战,讨论了1651年至1683年间的发展。最后一部分集中于送礼,以及马格里布和西欧社会之间明显的“文化不可通约性”(160)。海因森·罗奇(Heinsen Roach)很好地指出,与自我感知的欧洲外交关系思想相比,当代欧洲对朝贡关系地位低下的评论符合欧洲优越性的发展话语,而这本书在试图摆脱优越性话语以获得更细致入微的历史方面非常成功。关注北非摄政时期对欧洲外交发展留下的印记是这部作品有趣和重要的原因,但它也指出了研究现代早期伊斯兰世界历史的一个共同问题——缺乏原始材料。作者依赖于重要的原始资料,既有出版的资料,也有档案文件——但这些都是欧洲的。保存困难和语言障碍肯定会使北非和奥斯曼帝国的材料纳入分析变得复杂,但如果能够更直接地从这些材料中提炼出马格里布的观点——如果可以的话——将为Heinsen Roach的重要主张提供更多的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HISTORIAN
HISTORIAN HISTORY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊介绍: Founded in 1938, The Historian has one of the largest circulations of any scholarly journal in the US or Britain with over 13,000 paid subscribers, both individual and institutional. The Historian seeks to publish only the finest of contemporary and relevant historical scholarship. It is the commitment of The Historian to serve as an integrator for the historical profession, bringing together the many strands of historical analysis through the publication of a diverse collection of articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信