Anxiety, Beliefs and Covid-19 in Two Periods of the Pandemic in Brazil: A comparative study

IF 0.3 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Geovanna Santana De Souza Turri, Renata Elly Barbosa Fonte, Luiz Guilherme Lima-Silva, Andre Faro
{"title":"Anxiety, Beliefs and Covid-19 in Two Periods of the Pandemic in Brazil: A comparative study","authors":"Geovanna Santana De Souza Turri, Renata Elly Barbosa Fonte, Luiz Guilherme Lima-Silva, Andre Faro","doi":"10.22544/rcps.v40i02.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research compared evocations regarding the term “coronavirus” during two different periodsin the Covid-19 pandemic in Brazil in 2020 — March (beginning of the pandemic in the country)and June (Brazil as the epicenter of the pandemic) —, considering the presence or absence ofanxiety symptoms in participants. The methodology adopted the free evocation technique and theGeneralized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-2) symptom scale. The sample was composed of 5,961 womenand 1,153 men. Participant selection was relegated to convenience sampling by means of an onlinequestionnaire. Results showed that the coronavirus had diff erential impacts among the groups thatwere assessed and according to the time of data collection. In general, in March, people with anxietysymptoms had a more catastrophic view of the future, while people without those symptoms had aless unfavorable repertoire to adjust to the situation. In June, both groups reported a negative viewof the scenario, indicating a decrease or exhaustion in their capacity for psychological adjustment.This suggests the possibility of an increase of some conditions that result in adaptive impairment,exhaustion, and mental illness. Finally, it is important to understand people’s beliefs about the coronavirusat diff erent times of the pandemic because it is a favorable period for the emergence and/orintensification of mental disorders.","PeriodicalId":41141,"journal":{"name":"Revista Costarricense de Psicologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Costarricense de Psicologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22544/rcps.v40i02.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research compared evocations regarding the term “coronavirus” during two different periodsin the Covid-19 pandemic in Brazil in 2020 — March (beginning of the pandemic in the country)and June (Brazil as the epicenter of the pandemic) —, considering the presence or absence ofanxiety symptoms in participants. The methodology adopted the free evocation technique and theGeneralized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-2) symptom scale. The sample was composed of 5,961 womenand 1,153 men. Participant selection was relegated to convenience sampling by means of an onlinequestionnaire. Results showed that the coronavirus had diff erential impacts among the groups thatwere assessed and according to the time of data collection. In general, in March, people with anxietysymptoms had a more catastrophic view of the future, while people without those symptoms had aless unfavorable repertoire to adjust to the situation. In June, both groups reported a negative viewof the scenario, indicating a decrease or exhaustion in their capacity for psychological adjustment.This suggests the possibility of an increase of some conditions that result in adaptive impairment,exhaustion, and mental illness. Finally, it is important to understand people’s beliefs about the coronavirusat diff erent times of the pandemic because it is a favorable period for the emergence and/orintensification of mental disorders.
巴西两个大流行时期的焦虑、信念和Covid-19:比较研究
这项研究比较了2020年巴西新冠肺炎大流行的两个不同时期——3月(该国大流行开始)和6月(巴西是大流行的中心)——对“冠状病毒”一词的唤起,考虑到参与者是否存在焦虑症状。方法采用自由唤起技术和广泛性焦虑症(GAD-2)症状量表。样本由5961名女性和1153名男性组成。参与者的选择被降级为通过在线问卷的方便抽样。结果显示,根据数据收集的时间,冠状病毒在被评估的人群中具有不同的影响。总的来说,在三月份,有焦虑症状的人对未来有着更灾难性的看法,而没有这些症状的人则有着适应这种情况的不利心理。6月,两组人都报告了对这种情况的负面看法,表明他们的心理调整能力下降或耗尽。这表明某些情况可能会增加,从而导致适应性障碍、疲惫和精神疾病。最后,了解人们在疫情不同时期对冠状病毒的看法很重要,因为这是精神障碍出现和/或加剧的有利时期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Costarricense de Psicologia
Revista Costarricense de Psicologia PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信