Introduction

Q4 Social Sciences
A. Hills
{"title":"Introduction","authors":"A. Hills","doi":"10.1080/02681307.2017.1462551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Identifying the best way to manage everyday security in fragile post-conflict cities is as challenging today as it has ever been, and Mogadishu is one of the most challenging in the world, as the capital of the notoriously failed state of Somalia. This Whitehall Paper explores the ways in which Mogadishu’s inhabitants try to stay out of harm’s way, from security officials in the presidential compound of Villa Somalia to the city’s powerful district commissioners, from patrolling policemen to the women road-sweepers in the rubbish-filled alleyways of the Waberi district. Its central proposition is that security is best understood as a coherent relationship or activity based on the need for physical safety today, rather than in the future. It uses the neighbourhood-watch schemes developed in certain districts of Mogadishu−most notably Waberi− to understand the ways in which the city’s inhabitants respond to the security models promoted by international advisers, who in fact are based in the safety of the city’s Aden Adde International Airport. The most immediate security challenges confronting the city are terrorism-related, with the Islamic militant group Al-Shabaab the main concern, but the legacy of 25 years of conflict and violence means that the security threats faced by Mogadishu overlap with current terrorism and indeed are mutually reinforcing and indicative of broader political and social tensions. Special attention is paid in this paper to the city’s security plan and the points at which the local and the international meet. The level of insecurity in Mogadishu− and the length of time this insecurity has persisted− is extreme: at the time of writing, a truck bomb at a busy junction near key ministry buildings had killed at least 350 people, the country’s deadliest attack. Yet all sectors of society are exposed to a range of physical threats on a daily basis, arising from interclan conflicts, Al-Shabaab attacks, revenge killings, trigger-happy guards, or as a result of conflicts about land, property and livestock. Internally displaced persons (IDPs), members of minority clans and women are the","PeriodicalId":37791,"journal":{"name":"Whitehall Papers","volume":"91 1","pages":"1 - 5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02681307.2017.1462551","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Whitehall Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02681307.2017.1462551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Identifying the best way to manage everyday security in fragile post-conflict cities is as challenging today as it has ever been, and Mogadishu is one of the most challenging in the world, as the capital of the notoriously failed state of Somalia. This Whitehall Paper explores the ways in which Mogadishu’s inhabitants try to stay out of harm’s way, from security officials in the presidential compound of Villa Somalia to the city’s powerful district commissioners, from patrolling policemen to the women road-sweepers in the rubbish-filled alleyways of the Waberi district. Its central proposition is that security is best understood as a coherent relationship or activity based on the need for physical safety today, rather than in the future. It uses the neighbourhood-watch schemes developed in certain districts of Mogadishu−most notably Waberi− to understand the ways in which the city’s inhabitants respond to the security models promoted by international advisers, who in fact are based in the safety of the city’s Aden Adde International Airport. The most immediate security challenges confronting the city are terrorism-related, with the Islamic militant group Al-Shabaab the main concern, but the legacy of 25 years of conflict and violence means that the security threats faced by Mogadishu overlap with current terrorism and indeed are mutually reinforcing and indicative of broader political and social tensions. Special attention is paid in this paper to the city’s security plan and the points at which the local and the international meet. The level of insecurity in Mogadishu− and the length of time this insecurity has persisted− is extreme: at the time of writing, a truck bomb at a busy junction near key ministry buildings had killed at least 350 people, the country’s deadliest attack. Yet all sectors of society are exposed to a range of physical threats on a daily basis, arising from interclan conflicts, Al-Shabaab attacks, revenge killings, trigger-happy guards, or as a result of conflicts about land, property and livestock. Internally displaced persons (IDPs), members of minority clans and women are the
介绍
在脆弱的冲突后城市,确定管理日常安全的最佳方式在今天和以往一样具有挑战性,而摩加迪沙作为臭名昭著的失败国家索马里的首都,是世界上最具挑战性的城市之一。这篇白厅文件探讨了摩加迪沙居民试图远离伤害的方式,从索马里别墅总统府的安全官员到该市强大的地区专员,从巡逻警察到瓦贝里区垃圾遍地的小巷中的女性道路清扫工。其核心主张是,安全最好被理解为一种基于当今而非未来人身安全需求的连贯关系或活动。它利用摩加迪沙某些地区制定的邻里守望计划——最著名的是瓦贝里——来了解该市居民对国际顾问倡导的安全模式的反应,而国际顾问实际上是以该市亚丁-阿德国际机场的安全为基础的。该市面临的最直接的安全挑战与恐怖主义有关,伊斯兰激进组织青年党是主要关注点,但25年冲突和暴力的遗留问题意味着摩加迪沙面临的安全威胁与当前的恐怖主义重叠,而且确实是相辅相成的,表明了更广泛的政治和社会紧张局势。本文特别关注城市的安全规划以及地方和国际的交汇点。摩加迪沙的不安全程度——以及这种不安全持续的时间——是极端的:在撰写本文时,在关键部委大楼附近的一个繁忙路口发生的卡车炸弹袭击已造成至少350人死亡,这是该国最致命的袭击。然而,社会各阶层每天都面临着一系列人身威胁,这些威胁源于跨地区冲突、青年党袭击、报复性杀戮、乐于开枪的警卫,或是土地、财产和牲畜冲突。境内流离失所者、少数民族部族成员和妇女是
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Whitehall Papers
Whitehall Papers Social Sciences-Archeology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: The Whitehall Paper series provides in-depth studies of specific developments, issues or themes in the field of national and international defence and security. Published three times a year, Whitehall Papers reflect the highest standards of original research and analysis, and are invaluable background material for policy-makers and specialists alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信