Using Repertory Grids as a Tool for Mixed Methods Research: A Critical Assessment

IF 3.8 1区社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY

Journal of Mixed Methods Research Pub Date : 2022-03-25 DOI:10.1177/15586898221077569

Gregory Hadley, Myles Grogan

引用次数: 2

Abstract

When used in an informed and careful manner, the repertory grid technique offers mixed methods researchers a way to quickly gain a deeper understanding of their participants’ concerns, issues, and worldviews. This paper critically assesses the potential contributions of the repertory grid technique when used in mixed methods research. After providing a background survey and description of this relatively little-known research instrument, the strengths and limitations of repertory grids are considered. This report discusses some of the ways that this technique can significantly enhance the quality of the data collected from research participants within the three core models of the mixed method design framework.

查看原文本刊更多论文

使用库存网格作为混合方法研究的工具:一个关键的评估

当以知情和谨慎的方式使用时，储备网格技术为研究人员提供了一种快速深入了解参与者关切、问题和世界观的混合方法。本文批判性地评估了储备网格技术在混合方法研究中的潜在贡献。在对这种相对鲜为人知的研究工具进行背景调查和描述后，考虑了储备网格的优势和局限性。本报告讨论了在混合方法设计框架的三个核心模型中，该技术可以显著提高从研究参与者那里收集的数据质量的一些方法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Mixed Methods Research SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

10.40

自引率

28.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Mixed Methods Research serves as a premiere outlet for ground-breaking and seminal work in the field of mixed methods research. Of primary importance will be building an international and multidisciplinary community of mixed methods researchers. The journal''s scope includes exploring a global terminology and nomenclature for mixed methods research, delineating where mixed methods research may be used most effectively, creating the paradigmatic and philosophical foundations for mixed methods research, illuminating design and procedure issues, and determining the logistics of conducting mixed methods research. JMMR invites articles from a wide variety of international perspectives, including academics and practitioners from psychology, sociology, education, evaluation, health sciences, geography, communication, management, family studies, marketing, social work, and other related disciplines across the social, behavioral, and human sciences.