Sentiment Analysis and Text Analysis of the Public Discourse on Twitter about COVID-19 and MPox

IF 3.7 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Nirmalya Thakur
{"title":"Sentiment Analysis and Text Analysis of the Public Discourse on Twitter about COVID-19 and MPox","authors":"Nirmalya Thakur","doi":"10.3390/bdcc7020116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mining and analysis of the big data of Twitter conversations have been of significant interest to the scientific community in the fields of healthcare, epidemiology, big data, data science, computer science, and their related areas, as can be seen from several works in the last few years that focused on sentiment analysis and other forms of text analysis of tweets related to Ebola, E-Coli, Dengue, Human Papillomavirus (HPV), Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), Measles, Zika virus, H1N1, influenza-like illness, swine flu, flu, Cholera, Listeriosis, cancer, Liver Disease, Inflammatory Bowel Disease, kidney disease, lupus, Parkinson’s, Diphtheria, and West Nile virus. The recent outbreaks of COVID-19 and MPox have served as “catalysts” for Twitter usage related to seeking and sharing information, views, opinions, and sentiments involving both of these viruses. None of the prior works in this field analyzed tweets focusing on both COVID-19 and MPox simultaneously. To address this research gap, a total of 61,862 tweets that focused on MPox and COVID-19 simultaneously, posted between 7 May 2022 and 3 March 2023, were studied. The findings and contributions of this study are manifold. First, the results of sentiment analysis using the VADER (Valence Aware Dictionary for sEntiment Reasoning) approach shows that nearly half the tweets (46.88%) had a negative sentiment. It was followed by tweets that had a positive sentiment (31.97%) and tweets that had a neutral sentiment (21.14%), respectively. Second, this paper presents the top 50 hashtags used in these tweets. Third, it presents the top 100 most frequently used words in these tweets after performing tokenization, removal of stopwords, and word frequency analysis. The findings indicate that tweets in this context included a high level of interest regarding COVID-19, MPox and other viruses, President Biden, and Ukraine. Finally, a comprehensive comparative study that compares the contributions of this paper with 49 prior works in this field is presented to further uphold the relevance and novelty of this work.","PeriodicalId":36397,"journal":{"name":"Big Data and Cognitive Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Big Data and Cognitive Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc7020116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Mining and analysis of the big data of Twitter conversations have been of significant interest to the scientific community in the fields of healthcare, epidemiology, big data, data science, computer science, and their related areas, as can be seen from several works in the last few years that focused on sentiment analysis and other forms of text analysis of tweets related to Ebola, E-Coli, Dengue, Human Papillomavirus (HPV), Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), Measles, Zika virus, H1N1, influenza-like illness, swine flu, flu, Cholera, Listeriosis, cancer, Liver Disease, Inflammatory Bowel Disease, kidney disease, lupus, Parkinson’s, Diphtheria, and West Nile virus. The recent outbreaks of COVID-19 and MPox have served as “catalysts” for Twitter usage related to seeking and sharing information, views, opinions, and sentiments involving both of these viruses. None of the prior works in this field analyzed tweets focusing on both COVID-19 and MPox simultaneously. To address this research gap, a total of 61,862 tweets that focused on MPox and COVID-19 simultaneously, posted between 7 May 2022 and 3 March 2023, were studied. The findings and contributions of this study are manifold. First, the results of sentiment analysis using the VADER (Valence Aware Dictionary for sEntiment Reasoning) approach shows that nearly half the tweets (46.88%) had a negative sentiment. It was followed by tweets that had a positive sentiment (31.97%) and tweets that had a neutral sentiment (21.14%), respectively. Second, this paper presents the top 50 hashtags used in these tweets. Third, it presents the top 100 most frequently used words in these tweets after performing tokenization, removal of stopwords, and word frequency analysis. The findings indicate that tweets in this context included a high level of interest regarding COVID-19, MPox and other viruses, President Biden, and Ukraine. Finally, a comprehensive comparative study that compares the contributions of this paper with 49 prior works in this field is presented to further uphold the relevance and novelty of this work.
关于COVID-19和MPox的Twitter公共话语的情感分析和文本分析
挖掘和分析推特对话的大数据一直是医疗保健、流行病学、大数据、数据科学、计算机科学及其相关领域的科学界关注的焦点,这可以从过去几年的几项工作中看出,这些工作侧重于情绪分析和其他形式的文本分析,人类乳头瘤病毒(HPV)、中东呼吸综合征(MERS)、麻疹、寨卡病毒、H1N1、流感样疾病、猪流感、流感、霍乱、李斯特菌病、癌症、肝病、炎症性肠病、肾病、狼疮、帕金森病、白喉和西尼罗河病毒。最近爆发的新冠肺炎和猴痘成为推特使用的“催化剂”,用于寻求和分享涉及这两种病毒的信息、观点、意见和情感。该领域先前的工作都没有分析同时关注新冠肺炎和猴痘的推文。为了解决这一研究差距,研究了2022年5月7日至2023年3月3日期间发布的61862条同时关注猴痘和新冠肺炎的推文。这项研究的发现和贡献是多方面的。首先,使用VADER(Valence Aware Dictionary for sEntitment Reasoning)方法进行情绪分析的结果显示,近一半的推文(46.88%)具有负面情绪。紧随其后的是积极情绪的推文(31.97%)和中立情绪的推特(21.14%)。其次,本文介绍了这些推文中使用的前50个标签。第三,在进行标记化、删除停止语和词频分析后,它列出了这些推文中最常用的前100个单词。调查结果表明,在这种情况下,推文中包括对新冠肺炎、猴痘和其他病毒、拜登总统和乌克兰的高度关注。最后,将本文的贡献与该领域已有的49部作品进行了全面的比较研究,以进一步证明本文的相关性和新颖性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Big Data and Cognitive Computing
Big Data and Cognitive Computing Business, Management and Accounting-Management Information Systems
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.10%
发文量
128
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信