The Complex Nature of Student Retention at America’s Community Colleges

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
P. Sullivan, Abigail Bell, David Nielsen
{"title":"The Complex Nature of Student Retention at America’s Community Colleges","authors":"P. Sullivan, Abigail Bell, David Nielsen","doi":"10.1177/00915521231163855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Responding to Tinto’s call for studies of retention that center on “the students’ view of their experience” (p. 11), this research project reports findings from telephone interviews of 131 students who stopped out at our home institution, a large open admissions community college in the northeast. Our objective was to find out why these students stopped out and what our institution might have done to keep them enrolled. Method: Adopting a phenomenological approach, we analyzed our data set following the principles of thematic analysis. Results: We found that a large percentage of the students we contacted—previously identified as stopping out—had, in fact, either continued their education at another institution or met their educational goals. Furthermore, a large proportion of students we interviewed did not return for reasons that were beyond the control of the institution. The majority of these were related to personal and family matters or work responsibilities. Contributions: Our findings suggest that retention at community colleges is a highly complex, individualized process, with a host of variables that can affect individual students in different ways. Our findings also suggest that retention at community colleges may be more complex than traditional protocols currently in place can accurately measure.","PeriodicalId":46564,"journal":{"name":"Community College Review","volume":"51 1","pages":"311 - 336"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community College Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00915521231163855","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: Responding to Tinto’s call for studies of retention that center on “the students’ view of their experience” (p. 11), this research project reports findings from telephone interviews of 131 students who stopped out at our home institution, a large open admissions community college in the northeast. Our objective was to find out why these students stopped out and what our institution might have done to keep them enrolled. Method: Adopting a phenomenological approach, we analyzed our data set following the principles of thematic analysis. Results: We found that a large percentage of the students we contacted—previously identified as stopping out—had, in fact, either continued their education at another institution or met their educational goals. Furthermore, a large proportion of students we interviewed did not return for reasons that were beyond the control of the institution. The majority of these were related to personal and family matters or work responsibilities. Contributions: Our findings suggest that retention at community colleges is a highly complex, individualized process, with a host of variables that can affect individual students in different ways. Our findings also suggest that retention at community colleges may be more complex than traditional protocols currently in place can accurately measure.
美国社区大学学生留存率的复杂性质
目标:为了响应Tinto关于以“学生对自己经历的看法”为中心的保留研究的呼吁(第11页),该研究项目报告了131名学生的电话采访结果,这些学生曾在我们的母校——东北部一所大型开放招生社区学院——停留。我们的目标是找出这些学生为什么辍学,以及我们的学校可能会做些什么来留住他们。方法:采用现象学方法,按照主题分析的原则对数据集进行分析。结果:我们发现,在我们接触的学生中,有很大一部分——之前被认定为辍学——实际上要么在另一所学校继续接受教育,要么达到了他们的教育目标。此外,我们采访的大部分学生由于学校无法控制的原因没有回来。其中大多数与个人和家庭事务或工作责任有关。贡献:我们的研究结果表明,社区大学的留校是一个高度复杂、个性化的过程,有很多变量可以以不同的方式影响个别学生。我们的研究结果还表明,社区大学的保留率可能比目前制定的传统协议更复杂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Community College Review
Community College Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The Community College Review (CCR) has led the nation for over 35 years in the publication of scholarly, peer-reviewed research and commentary on community colleges. CCR welcomes manuscripts dealing with all aspects of community college administration, education, and policy, both within the American higher education system as well as within the higher education systems of other countries that have similar tertiary institutions. All submitted manuscripts undergo a blind review. When manuscripts are not accepted for publication, we offer suggestions for how they might be revised. The ultimate intent is to further discourse about community colleges, their students, and the educators and administrators who work within these institutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信