Positive margins (R1) risk factors in breast cancer conservative surgery

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
A. Lombardi, E. Pastore, S. Maggi, G. Stanzani, V. Vitale, C. Romano, L. Bersigotti, A. Vecchione, C. Amanti
{"title":"Positive margins (R1) risk factors in breast cancer conservative surgery","authors":"A. Lombardi, E. Pastore, S. Maggi, G. Stanzani, V. Vitale, C. Romano, L. Bersigotti, A. Vecchione, C. Amanti","doi":"10.2147/BCTT.S210788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The primary goal in conservative breast cancer surgery is the complete excision of the tumor, but at the same time attempting to obtain a satisfactory postoperative esthetic result. The notion of “No Ink on Tumor” that indicates exclusively the presence of tumor cells on the inked surface of the surgical specimen is now the gold standard; however, the problem of the free margin is still a fundamental topic of debate that has not yet found a definitive solution. Methods Our retrospective analysis takes into account 1440 patients undergoing breast conservative surgery, from October 2004 to November 2018, all treated at the breast unit of our institution. Results Positive margins (R1) rate was 10.2% (147 cases out of 1440). Overall survival was 95% at 5 years and 89% at 10 years. No differences in mortality and local recurrence rate between R0 and R1 patients were found. Half of the R1 patients underwent secondary surgery with enlargement of margins, while in the other half we performed direct mastectomy. Among the analyzed variables, age, histological size, histological type, grading, multifocality, lympho-vascular invasion and lymph node status were significantly correlated with the R1 status. The multivariate analysis shows the association of age and surgical technique (oncoplastic) with R1 status. Conclusion Further studies will allow the creation of a statistical model, for better pre-operative prediction of patients with higher risk of R1 and better selection of patients to be candidates for conservative surgery.","PeriodicalId":9106,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy","volume":"11 1","pages":"243 - 248"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/BCTT.S210788","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer : Targets and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S210788","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Background The primary goal in conservative breast cancer surgery is the complete excision of the tumor, but at the same time attempting to obtain a satisfactory postoperative esthetic result. The notion of “No Ink on Tumor” that indicates exclusively the presence of tumor cells on the inked surface of the surgical specimen is now the gold standard; however, the problem of the free margin is still a fundamental topic of debate that has not yet found a definitive solution. Methods Our retrospective analysis takes into account 1440 patients undergoing breast conservative surgery, from October 2004 to November 2018, all treated at the breast unit of our institution. Results Positive margins (R1) rate was 10.2% (147 cases out of 1440). Overall survival was 95% at 5 years and 89% at 10 years. No differences in mortality and local recurrence rate between R0 and R1 patients were found. Half of the R1 patients underwent secondary surgery with enlargement of margins, while in the other half we performed direct mastectomy. Among the analyzed variables, age, histological size, histological type, grading, multifocality, lympho-vascular invasion and lymph node status were significantly correlated with the R1 status. The multivariate analysis shows the association of age and surgical technique (oncoplastic) with R1 status. Conclusion Further studies will allow the creation of a statistical model, for better pre-operative prediction of patients with higher risk of R1 and better selection of patients to be candidates for conservative surgery.
乳腺癌症保守手术中的阳性边缘(R1)危险因素
背景癌症保守手术的主要目标是完全切除肿瘤,但同时尝试获得令人满意的术后美学效果。“肿瘤上没有墨水”的概念只表明手术标本墨水表面上存在肿瘤细胞,现在已成为金标准;然而,自由边际问题仍然是一个基本的争论话题,尚未找到最终的解决方案。方法我们的回顾性分析考虑了2004年10月至2018年11月接受乳腺保守手术的1440名患者,他们都在我们机构的乳腺科接受治疗。结果阳性边缘(R1)率为10.2%(1440例中147例)。总生存率在5年时为95%,在10年时为89%。R0和R1患者的死亡率和局部复发率没有差异。R1患者中有一半接受了边缘扩大的二次手术,而另一半则进行了直接乳房切除术。在分析的变量中,年龄、组织学大小、组织学类型、分级、多灶性、淋巴血管浸润和淋巴结状态与R1状态显著相关。多变量分析显示年龄和手术技术(肿瘤整形术)与R1状态的相关性。结论进一步的研究将有助于建立一个统计模型,以便更好地预测R1风险较高的患者的术前预测,并更好地选择患者作为保守手术的候选者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信