The effects of subtenon and intravenous dexmedetomidine on patients undergoing cataract surgery: A comparative randomized controlled double-blind study.

IF 1.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Ashraf Magdy Eskandr Saad, Osama Abd-Allah Elmorsy, Sadik Abd-Elmaseeh Sadik
{"title":"The effects of subtenon and intravenous dexmedetomidine on patients undergoing cataract surgery: A comparative randomized controlled double-blind study.","authors":"Ashraf Magdy Eskandr Saad, Osama Abd-Allah Elmorsy, Sadik Abd-Elmaseeh Sadik","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_362_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>This prospective randomized study designed to evaluate the efficacy of dexmedetomidine either added to LA mixture or administered IV during subtenon block for cataract surgery.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>75 patients, undergoing cataract surgery with subtenon anesthesia, were assigned randomly into three equal groups, Group I received subtenon bupivacaine 0.5% (1 ml) + lidocaine 2% (1 ml) + saline 0.9% (0.5 ml) and IV infusion of normal saline. Group II received subtenon bupivacaine 0.5% (1 ml) + lidocaine 2% (1 ml) + 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine (0.5 ml) and IV infusion of normal saline. Group III received subtenon bupivacaine 0.5% (1 ml) + lidocaine 2% (1 ml) + saline 0.9% (0.5 μl) and IV infusion of 0.5 mg/kg dexmedetomidine over 10 min. before subtenon block. We recorded onset and duration of sensory and motor block, pain during subtenon injection, intraoperative hemodynamics, intraocular pressure, sedation and postoperative pain score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant decrease in the onset of action and an increase in the duration of sensory block in Group II. Pain during subtenon injection was significantly less in group III. Sedation Score was higher in Group III, while heart rate showed a significant reduction in the same group. The VAS was significantly decreased in group II. After the end of surgery, the intraocular pressure was significantly decreased in Groups II and III.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Subtenon dexmedetomidine shortens onset time, prolongs sensory block durations and significantly decreases the postoperative pain score with hemodynamic stability, while, IV dexmedetomidine substantially reduces pain during subtenon block and produces intra-operative sedation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10661625/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_362_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background and aims: This prospective randomized study designed to evaluate the efficacy of dexmedetomidine either added to LA mixture or administered IV during subtenon block for cataract surgery.

Material and methods: 75 patients, undergoing cataract surgery with subtenon anesthesia, were assigned randomly into three equal groups, Group I received subtenon bupivacaine 0.5% (1 ml) + lidocaine 2% (1 ml) + saline 0.9% (0.5 ml) and IV infusion of normal saline. Group II received subtenon bupivacaine 0.5% (1 ml) + lidocaine 2% (1 ml) + 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine (0.5 ml) and IV infusion of normal saline. Group III received subtenon bupivacaine 0.5% (1 ml) + lidocaine 2% (1 ml) + saline 0.9% (0.5 μl) and IV infusion of 0.5 mg/kg dexmedetomidine over 10 min. before subtenon block. We recorded onset and duration of sensory and motor block, pain during subtenon injection, intraoperative hemodynamics, intraocular pressure, sedation and postoperative pain score.

Results: There was a significant decrease in the onset of action and an increase in the duration of sensory block in Group II. Pain during subtenon injection was significantly less in group III. Sedation Score was higher in Group III, while heart rate showed a significant reduction in the same group. The VAS was significantly decreased in group II. After the end of surgery, the intraocular pressure was significantly decreased in Groups II and III.

Conclusion: Subtenon dexmedetomidine shortens onset time, prolongs sensory block durations and significantly decreases the postoperative pain score with hemodynamic stability, while, IV dexmedetomidine substantially reduces pain during subtenon block and produces intra-operative sedation.

subtenon和静脉注射右美托咪定对白内障手术患者的影响:一项比较随机对照双盲研究
背景和目的:这项前瞻性随机研究旨在评估右美托咪定在LA混合物中的疗效,或在白内障手术的皮下阻滞期间静脉注射的疗效。材料和方法:75例白内障手术患者在硬膜下麻醉下,随机分为三组,第一组接受0.5%(1ml)的硬膜下布比卡因+2%(1ml+0.9%(0.5ml)生理盐水静脉滴注。第二组接受0.5%(1 ml)的丁哌卡因+2%(1 ml)的利多卡因+0.5μg/kg的右美托咪定(0.5 ml),并静脉输注生理盐水。第三组在皮下阻滞前10分钟内接受0.5%(1 ml)的皮下布比卡因+2%(1 ml)的利多卡因+0.9%(0.5 ml)的生理盐水,并静脉输注0.5μg/kg的右美托咪定。我们记录了感觉和运动阻滞的发作和持续时间、皮下注射期间的疼痛、术中血液动力学、眼压、镇静和术后疼痛评分。结果:第二组的动作开始时间显著减少,感觉阻滞持续时间增加。第三组皮下注射期间的疼痛明显减轻。第三组镇静评分较高,而同一组的心率明显降低。第二组VAS显著降低。手术结束后,第II组和第III组的眼压显著降低。结论:右美托咪定能缩短起效时间,延长感觉阻滞持续时间,显著降低术后疼痛评分,血流动力学稳定,而IV组则能显著减轻右美托咪定阻滞时的疼痛,并产生术中镇静作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
129
期刊介绍: The JOACP publishes original peer-reviewed research and clinical work in all branches of anaesthesiology, pain, critical care and perioperative medicine including the application to basic sciences. In addition, the journal publishes review articles, special articles, brief communications/reports, case reports, and reports of new equipment, letters to editor, book reviews and obituaries. It is international in scope and comprehensive in coverage.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信