Doing Family Differently in School-to-Home Contexts: Gay Fathers at the Schoolhouse Door

IF 2.4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Andrew S. Leland
{"title":"Doing Family Differently in School-to-Home Contexts: Gay Fathers at the Schoolhouse Door","authors":"Andrew S. Leland","doi":"10.1177/0013161X20922582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This qualitative, phenomenological study explores gay fatherhood visibility in schools. The study was guided by prior research on families headed by lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, and queer (LGBTQ) parents, as well as the theoretical exploration of “doing family” for LGBTQ-headed households and queer families. Data Collection and Analysis: Data primarily consisted of two, face-to-face, semistructured interviews with 22 gay-fathered households living in one of two different community types: gay-friendly areas, or those known for LGBTQ inclusion and protection, and intolerant towns, or those with little-to-no evidence of inclusion and protection. Additionally, this study included artifacts such as handbooks, letters about events, and documents related to school curricula. All data were analyzed inductively. Findings: Nearly all fathers came out, or had disclosed their sexual orientation to school personnel—particularly in gay-friendly areas. Nevertheless, findings indicate that assumptions of heterosexuality persisted in both gay-friendly and intolerant areas to some extent. Some attempts to be more inclusive and representative of gay-fathered families depended on community type, but even these attempts did not recognize a wider spectrum of family configurations that may constitute gay fatherhood. Implications: This study raises questions about how school personnel, and leaders in particular, consider a wider spectrum of family configurations as they interact with students and students’ families. The findings provide insight into future scholarship focused on gay fatherhood, as well as how leadership programs can prepare leaders with the necessary skills and knowledge to interact with nondominant family structures.","PeriodicalId":48091,"journal":{"name":"Educational Administration Quarterly","volume":"57 1","pages":"143 - 173"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0013161X20922582","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Administration Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X20922582","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: This qualitative, phenomenological study explores gay fatherhood visibility in schools. The study was guided by prior research on families headed by lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, and queer (LGBTQ) parents, as well as the theoretical exploration of “doing family” for LGBTQ-headed households and queer families. Data Collection and Analysis: Data primarily consisted of two, face-to-face, semistructured interviews with 22 gay-fathered households living in one of two different community types: gay-friendly areas, or those known for LGBTQ inclusion and protection, and intolerant towns, or those with little-to-no evidence of inclusion and protection. Additionally, this study included artifacts such as handbooks, letters about events, and documents related to school curricula. All data were analyzed inductively. Findings: Nearly all fathers came out, or had disclosed their sexual orientation to school personnel—particularly in gay-friendly areas. Nevertheless, findings indicate that assumptions of heterosexuality persisted in both gay-friendly and intolerant areas to some extent. Some attempts to be more inclusive and representative of gay-fathered families depended on community type, but even these attempts did not recognize a wider spectrum of family configurations that may constitute gay fatherhood. Implications: This study raises questions about how school personnel, and leaders in particular, consider a wider spectrum of family configurations as they interact with students and students’ families. The findings provide insight into future scholarship focused on gay fatherhood, as well as how leadership programs can prepare leaders with the necessary skills and knowledge to interact with nondominant family structures.
在学校到家庭的背景下做不同的家庭:学校门口的同性恋父亲
目的:这项定性的现象学研究探讨了同性恋父亲身份在学校中的可见性。这项研究以先前对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和酷儿(LGBTQ)父母领导的家庭的研究为指导,以及对LGBTQ领导的家庭和酷儿家庭“做家庭”的理论探索。数据收集和分析:数据主要包括对22个同性恋父亲家庭的两次面对面半结构访谈,这些家庭生活在两种不同的社区类型之一:对同性恋友好的地区,或那些以包容和保护LGBTQ而闻名的地区,以及不宽容的城镇,或那些几乎没有包容和保护证据的地区。此外,这项研究还包括手册、关于事件的信件和与学校课程相关的文件等文物。对所有数据进行归纳分析。调查结果:几乎所有的父亲都出来了,或者向学校工作人员透露了自己的性取向,尤其是在同性恋友好地区。然而,研究结果表明,异性恋的假设在某种程度上存在于对同性恋友好和不宽容的地区。一些试图更具包容性和代表性的同性恋父亲家庭的尝试取决于社区类型,但即使是这些尝试也没有认识到可能构成同性恋父亲身份的更广泛的家庭结构。启示:这项研究提出了一个问题,即学校工作人员,尤其是领导,在与学生和学生家庭互动时,如何考虑更广泛的家庭结构。这些发现为未来关注同性恋父亲身份的学术提供了见解,以及领导力项目如何为领导者培养必要的技能和知识,使他们能够与非主导家庭结构互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educational Administration Quarterly
Educational Administration Quarterly EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: Educational Administration Quarterly presents prominent empirical and conceptual articles focused on timely and critical leadership and policy issues of educational organizations. As an editorial team, we embrace traditional and emergent research paradigms, methods, and issues. We particularly promote the publication of rigorous and relevant scholarly work that enhances linkages among and utility for educational policy, practice, and research arenas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信