Changes in Flexibility and Force are not Different after Static Versus Dynamic Stretching

Shingo Matsuo, M. Iwata, M. Miyazaki, Taizan Fukaya, Eiji Yamanaka, K. Nagata, Wakako Tsuchida, Y. Asai, Shigeyuki Suzuki
{"title":"Changes in Flexibility and Force are not Different after Static Versus Dynamic Stretching","authors":"Shingo Matsuo, M. Iwata, M. Miyazaki, Taizan Fukaya, Eiji Yamanaka, K. Nagata, Wakako Tsuchida, Y. Asai, Shigeyuki Suzuki","doi":"10.1055/a-1001-1993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this study, we examined the effects of static and dynamic stretching on range of motion (ROM), passive torque (PT) at pain onset, passive stiffness, and isometric muscle force. We conducted a randomized crossover trial in which 16 healthy young men performed a total of 300 s of active static or dynamic stretching of the right knee flexors on two separate days in random order. To assess the effects of stretching, we measured the ROM, PT at pain onset, passive stiffness during passive knee extension, and maximum voluntary isometric knee flexion force using an isokinetic dynamometer immediately before and after stretching. Both static and dynamic stretching significantly increased the ROM and PT at pain onset (p<0.01) and significantly decreased the passive stiffness and isometric knee flexion force immediately after stretching (p<0.01). However, the magnitude of change did not differ between the two stretching methods for any measurements. Our results suggest that 300 s of either static or dynamic stretching can increase flexibility and decrease isometric muscle force; however, the effects of stretching do not appear to differ between the two stretching methods.","PeriodicalId":74857,"journal":{"name":"Sports medicine international open","volume":"3 1","pages":"E89 - E95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/a-1001-1993","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports medicine international open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1001-1993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Abstract In this study, we examined the effects of static and dynamic stretching on range of motion (ROM), passive torque (PT) at pain onset, passive stiffness, and isometric muscle force. We conducted a randomized crossover trial in which 16 healthy young men performed a total of 300 s of active static or dynamic stretching of the right knee flexors on two separate days in random order. To assess the effects of stretching, we measured the ROM, PT at pain onset, passive stiffness during passive knee extension, and maximum voluntary isometric knee flexion force using an isokinetic dynamometer immediately before and after stretching. Both static and dynamic stretching significantly increased the ROM and PT at pain onset (p<0.01) and significantly decreased the passive stiffness and isometric knee flexion force immediately after stretching (p<0.01). However, the magnitude of change did not differ between the two stretching methods for any measurements. Our results suggest that 300 s of either static or dynamic stretching can increase flexibility and decrease isometric muscle force; however, the effects of stretching do not appear to differ between the two stretching methods.
静态拉伸和动态拉伸后柔韧性和力的变化没有什么不同
在这项研究中,我们研究了静态和动态拉伸对运动范围(ROM)、疼痛发作时的被动扭矩(PT)、被动刚度和等长肌肉力的影响。我们进行了一项随机交叉试验,其中16名健康的年轻男性在两天内随机进行了300秒的主动静态或动态右膝屈肌拉伸。为了评估拉伸的效果,我们测量了ROM,疼痛发作时的PT,被动膝关节伸展时的被动刚度,以及在拉伸前后立即使用等速测功机的最大自主等距膝关节屈曲力。静态和动态拉伸均显著增加疼痛发作时的ROM和PT (p<0.01),显著降低被动刚度和拉伸后即刻的膝关节屈曲力(p<0.01)。然而,对于任何测量,两种拉伸方法之间的变化幅度没有差异。我们的研究结果表明,300秒的静态或动态拉伸都可以增加柔韧性,降低等长肌力;然而,拉伸的效果似乎在两种拉伸方法之间没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信