Intensive home care supports, informal care and private provision for people with dementia in Ireland

IF 2.4 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY
L. Carter, S. O’Neill, F. Keogh, M. Pierce, E. O'Shea
{"title":"Intensive home care supports, informal care and private provision for people with dementia in Ireland","authors":"L. Carter, S. O’Neill, F. Keogh, M. Pierce, E. O'Shea","doi":"10.1177/1471301219863580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background This study analysed the cost of intensive home care packages for people with dementia living on the boundary of home care and residential care facilities in Ireland. The cost of community-based services and supports, including informal care and private out-of-pocket expenditure, was compared to the cost of public and private residential care. Methods The study recruited 42 people with dementia and/or their caregivers, who were living on the boundary of home care and residential care, to an in-depth study on the cost of care. The Resource Utilization in Dementia scale was used to collect data on the utilization of standard formal care and informal care by people with dementia in receipt of an intensive home care package. Information on private out-of-pocket expenditure on care was also collected. Unit costs were assigned and community-based care was compared with public and private residential care alternatives. Results The average weekly cost of home care, including the intensive home care package, standard formal community care provision, medications, consumption and housing, was estimated at €1127. This is lower than the average weekly cost of public long-stay care facilities (€1526) and around the same as for private nursing home fees in the Dublin region (€1149). When the opportunity cost valuation of informal care is included, the cost of home care is higher than all types of residential care. Adding private care expenditure further inflates the cost of home care. Conclusion Keeping highly dependent people with dementia living at home is not cheap and raises questions about optimal resource allocation on the boundary of home care and residential care. Even with significant public spending on intensive home care packages, family care costs remain high. So too does private out-of-pocket expenditure on care for some people with dementia.","PeriodicalId":51413,"journal":{"name":"Dementia-International Journal of Social Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1471301219863580","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia-International Journal of Social Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301219863580","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background This study analysed the cost of intensive home care packages for people with dementia living on the boundary of home care and residential care facilities in Ireland. The cost of community-based services and supports, including informal care and private out-of-pocket expenditure, was compared to the cost of public and private residential care. Methods The study recruited 42 people with dementia and/or their caregivers, who were living on the boundary of home care and residential care, to an in-depth study on the cost of care. The Resource Utilization in Dementia scale was used to collect data on the utilization of standard formal care and informal care by people with dementia in receipt of an intensive home care package. Information on private out-of-pocket expenditure on care was also collected. Unit costs were assigned and community-based care was compared with public and private residential care alternatives. Results The average weekly cost of home care, including the intensive home care package, standard formal community care provision, medications, consumption and housing, was estimated at €1127. This is lower than the average weekly cost of public long-stay care facilities (€1526) and around the same as for private nursing home fees in the Dublin region (€1149). When the opportunity cost valuation of informal care is included, the cost of home care is higher than all types of residential care. Adding private care expenditure further inflates the cost of home care. Conclusion Keeping highly dependent people with dementia living at home is not cheap and raises questions about optimal resource allocation on the boundary of home care and residential care. Even with significant public spending on intensive home care packages, family care costs remain high. So too does private out-of-pocket expenditure on care for some people with dementia.
爱尔兰为痴呆症患者提供的强化家庭护理支持、非正式护理和私人服务
本研究分析了生活在爱尔兰家庭护理和住宿护理设施边界的痴呆症患者的强化家庭护理包的成本。将社区服务和支助的费用,包括非正式护理和私人自付费用,与公共和私人住宿护理的费用进行了比较。方法本研究招募了42名生活在家庭护理和寄宿护理边界的痴呆症患者和/或其照顾者,对护理成本进行深入研究。痴呆症资源利用量表用于收集接受强化家庭护理一揽子计划的痴呆症患者使用标准正式护理和非正式护理的数据。还收集了关于私人自付护理费用的资料。分配了单位成本,并将社区护理与公共和私人住宿护理替代方案进行了比较。结果家庭护理的平均每周费用估计为1127欧元,包括重症家庭护理包、标准正式社区护理提供、药物、消费和住房。这低于公共长期护理机构的平均每周费用(1526欧元),与都柏林地区私人养老院的费用(1149欧元)大致相同。当纳入非正式照护的机会成本评估时,家庭照护的成本高于所有类型的住宿照护。私人护理开支的增加进一步增加了家庭护理的成本。结论对高依赖度痴呆患者进行居家护理成本不低,存在居家护理与居家护理边界资源优化配置的问题。即使在家庭重症护理一揽子计划上有大量的公共支出,家庭护理成本仍然很高。对一些痴呆症患者的私人自费护理支出也在增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: Dementia acts as a major forum for social research of direct relevance to improving the quality of life and quality of care for people with dementia and their families. For the first time an international research journal is available for academics and practitioners that has as its primary paradigm the lived experience of dementia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信