Amniotic fluid volume and pregnancy outcomes in twin pregnancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Q3 Medicine
Dayna Whitcombe, Everett Magann, Susan Steelman, Zhuopei Hu, Songthip Ounpraseuth
{"title":"Amniotic fluid volume and pregnancy outcomes in twin pregnancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Dayna Whitcombe,&nbsp;Everett Magann,&nbsp;Susan Steelman,&nbsp;Zhuopei Hu,&nbsp;Songthip Ounpraseuth","doi":"10.1002/ajum.12361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To analyse amniotic fluid volume (AFV), specifically oligohydramnios or polyhydramnios, and associated pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in twin gestations through systematic review and meta-analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We utilised systematic review methodology to identify items within published and grey literature resources. Prospective and retrospective studies with a control group were included. Inclusion criteria were as follows: studies in English, twin pregnancy in which AFVs and associated pregnancy and/or neonatal outcomes were evaluated. Exclusion criteria included the presence of an anomalous fetus, chromosome abnormality, monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy complicated by twin–twin transfusion syndrome or twin-reversed arterial perfusion, twin gestations undergoing therapeutic interventions (<i>i.e.</i> fetoscopic laser photocoagulation and serial amniocentesis) and monochorionic monoamniotic twin pregnancy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The literature search identified 1068 abstracts, only four met criteria for inclusion and analysis. The pooled data (two studies per outcome) revealed no significant difference in rate of pre-term delivery (OR: 2.94; CI: 0.20–43.81), pre-term delivery less than 32 weeks (OR: 1.97; CI: 0.43–9.12), umbilical cord pH &lt; 7 (OR: 2.66; CI: 0.22–32.51), rate of stillbirth (OR: 4.13; CI: 0.40–42.70), neonatal death (OR: 1.48; CI: 0.05–43.94), rate of NICU admission (OR: 1.38; CI: 0.61–3.11) or rate of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants (OR: 1.39; CI: 0.33–5.94).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Based on the pooled data (two studies per outcome), there was no difference in the fate of pre-term delivery, umbilical cord pH &lt; 7, stillbirth, neonatal death or SGA infants. What is disturbing is the lack of studies (1946–2020) that analysed the association between AFV and pregnancy outcomes in twin pregnancies.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36517,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"26 4","pages":"249-257"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajum.12361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To analyse amniotic fluid volume (AFV), specifically oligohydramnios or polyhydramnios, and associated pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in twin gestations through systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

We utilised systematic review methodology to identify items within published and grey literature resources. Prospective and retrospective studies with a control group were included. Inclusion criteria were as follows: studies in English, twin pregnancy in which AFVs and associated pregnancy and/or neonatal outcomes were evaluated. Exclusion criteria included the presence of an anomalous fetus, chromosome abnormality, monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy complicated by twin–twin transfusion syndrome or twin-reversed arterial perfusion, twin gestations undergoing therapeutic interventions (i.e. fetoscopic laser photocoagulation and serial amniocentesis) and monochorionic monoamniotic twin pregnancy.

Results

The literature search identified 1068 abstracts, only four met criteria for inclusion and analysis. The pooled data (two studies per outcome) revealed no significant difference in rate of pre-term delivery (OR: 2.94; CI: 0.20–43.81), pre-term delivery less than 32 weeks (OR: 1.97; CI: 0.43–9.12), umbilical cord pH < 7 (OR: 2.66; CI: 0.22–32.51), rate of stillbirth (OR: 4.13; CI: 0.40–42.70), neonatal death (OR: 1.48; CI: 0.05–43.94), rate of NICU admission (OR: 1.38; CI: 0.61–3.11) or rate of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants (OR: 1.39; CI: 0.33–5.94).

Conclusion

Based on the pooled data (two studies per outcome), there was no difference in the fate of pre-term delivery, umbilical cord pH < 7, stillbirth, neonatal death or SGA infants. What is disturbing is the lack of studies (1946–2020) that analysed the association between AFV and pregnancy outcomes in twin pregnancies.

双胎妊娠的羊水容量与妊娠结局:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
通过系统回顾和荟萃分析,分析双胎妊娠中羊水体积(AFV),特别是羊水过少或羊水过多,以及相关的妊娠和新生儿结局。我们采用系统评价方法在已发表文献和灰色文献资源中确定项目。包括前瞻性和回顾性研究与对照组。纳入标准如下:英语研究,双胎妊娠,评估afv和相关妊娠和/或新生儿结局。排除标准包括异常胎儿、染色体异常、单绒毛膜双羊膜双胎妊娠合并双胎输血综合征或双胎动脉灌注逆转、接受治疗性干预(即胎儿镜激光光凝和连续羊膜穿刺术)的双胎妊娠和单绒毛膜单羊膜双胎妊娠。文献检索确定了1068篇摘要,只有4篇符合纳入和分析的标准。汇总数据(每个结果两项研究)显示早产率无显著差异(OR: 2.94;CI: 0.20-43.81),早产小于32周(OR: 1.97;CI: 0.43-9.12),脐带pH < 7 (OR: 2.66;CI: 0.22-32.51),死产率(OR: 4.13;CI: 0.40-42.70),新生儿死亡(OR: 1.48;CI: 0.05-43.94),新生儿重症监护病房入院率(OR: 1.38;CI: 0.61-3.11)或小胎龄(SGA)婴儿的发生率(or: 1.39;置信区间:0.33—-5.94)。根据汇总的数据(每个结局两项研究),早产、脐带pH < 7、死产、新生儿死亡或SGA婴儿的命运没有差异。令人不安的是,缺乏研究(1946-2020)分析双胎妊娠中AFV与妊娠结局之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信