Neke misli o nastanku augmentativnih/evaluativnih značenja hrvatskog sufiksa –ara

IF 0.2 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Gabrijela Buljan
{"title":"Neke misli o nastanku augmentativnih/evaluativnih značenja hrvatskog sufiksa –ara","authors":"Gabrijela Buljan","doi":"10.22210/suvlin.2023.095.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his typological study of the genesis of diminutive and augmentative suffixes Grandi (2011) attributed the development of augmentative suffixes in Romance and Slavic languages to four sources: agentive/ pejorative derivational suffixes, collective suffixes, relational suffixes, and – in Slavic languages – suffixes deriving place nouns. This paper seeks to establish how the Croatian suffix –ara fi ts into Grandi’s (2011) system. According to Babić (2002: 130, 132), suffixations in –ara primarily denote places but there is a small number of suffixations with augmentative or pejorative meaning. Skok (1971: 49–52), in turn, describes this Pan–Slavic suffix under the entry for the agentive suffix –ar, which goes back to Latin –arius. This paper sought to identify any conceptual indications in our synchronic data that the augmentative/ evaluative meanings of the suffix may have developed from any of the four meanings, viz. agentive/ pejorative, collective, relational and locative. The paper leans on usage–based models of language and Rainer’s (2005) model of semantic change in word formation involving two mechanisms: reinterpretation and approximation. Results indicate that the augmentative and other evaluative meanings of the suffix may have developed from its agentive/pejorative meaning through a complex interplay of reinterpretation and approximation, with some influence of metaphor and metonymy and structural factors. Our results are submitted as hypotheses to be tested in future by dedicated diachronic studies.","PeriodicalId":40950,"journal":{"name":"Suvremena Lingvistika","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suvremena Lingvistika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22210/suvlin.2023.095.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In his typological study of the genesis of diminutive and augmentative suffixes Grandi (2011) attributed the development of augmentative suffixes in Romance and Slavic languages to four sources: agentive/ pejorative derivational suffixes, collective suffixes, relational suffixes, and – in Slavic languages – suffixes deriving place nouns. This paper seeks to establish how the Croatian suffix –ara fi ts into Grandi’s (2011) system. According to Babić (2002: 130, 132), suffixations in –ara primarily denote places but there is a small number of suffixations with augmentative or pejorative meaning. Skok (1971: 49–52), in turn, describes this Pan–Slavic suffix under the entry for the agentive suffix –ar, which goes back to Latin –arius. This paper sought to identify any conceptual indications in our synchronic data that the augmentative/ evaluative meanings of the suffix may have developed from any of the four meanings, viz. agentive/ pejorative, collective, relational and locative. The paper leans on usage–based models of language and Rainer’s (2005) model of semantic change in word formation involving two mechanisms: reinterpretation and approximation. Results indicate that the augmentative and other evaluative meanings of the suffix may have developed from its agentive/pejorative meaning through a complex interplay of reinterpretation and approximation, with some influence of metaphor and metonymy and structural factors. Our results are submitted as hypotheses to be tested in future by dedicated diachronic studies.
关于克罗地亚语后缀-ara增强/评价意义上升的几点思考
格兰迪(2011)在其关于小后缀和扩充后缀起源的类型学研究中,将扩充后缀在罗曼斯语和斯拉夫语中的发展归因于四个来源:主词/贬义派生后缀、集体后缀、关系后缀,以及斯拉夫语的源自地名的后缀。本文试图确定克罗地亚语后缀-ara是如何进入Grandi(2011)的系统的。根据Babić(2002:130132)的说法,–ara中的后缀主要表示地方,但也有少数后缀具有增强或贬义。Skok(1971年:49–52)在代理后缀-ar的条目下描述了这个泛斯拉夫后缀,该后缀可以追溯到拉丁语arius。本文试图在我们的共时数据中确定后缀的增强/评价意义可能是由四种意义中的任何一种发展而来的任何概念指示,即代理/贬义、集体、关系和方位。本文采用基于使用的语言模型和Rainer(2005)的造词语义变化模型,涉及两种机制:重新解释和近似。结果表明,在隐喻、转喻和结构因素的影响下,后缀的增广意义和其他评价意义可能是由其代理/贬抑意义经过重新解释和近似的复杂相互作用而发展起来的。我们的研究结果是作为假设提交的,将在未来通过专门的历时研究进行检验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Suvremena Lingvistika
Suvremena Lingvistika LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信