{"title":"The Future Belongs to Us","authors":"Uroš Pajović","doi":"10.47982/spool.2022.2.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a principle of industrial and spatial organisation, self-management enabled Yugoslavia to shape its own socialism after the breakup with the Soviet Union and the rest of the Eastern Bloc — in 1986. It even represented the paradigmatic element of a proposal for an urban restructuring of New Belgrade submitted by Marxist philosopher Henri Lefebvre and architects Renaudie and Gilbaud. The Yugoslav experience of self-management is not the only one. The oldest precedent probably is the Paris Commune. Bottom-up self-management has unravelled the planet over, in factories of Eastern Europe, neighbourhoods in South American cities, and rural communities in North Africa and the Middle East, to mention some. \nThis essay will look at self-management as a critical socio-political paradigm inherently connected to spatial determinants and both a means and a goal of reorganising society in the contemporary moment and for the ever nearer future. \nThe narrative is positioned in a broader temporal context of mass misappropriation of space by mechanisms of power: be it state, corporate, state-corporate, or architectural; the context, that is, of “flat hierarchies” as the new office ping pong tables and bean bags and corporate campuses as the new public spaces, and in the narrower temporal context of a global pandemic forcing a redefinition of public and private, of work and labour relations.","PeriodicalId":52253,"journal":{"name":"Spool","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spool","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47982/spool.2022.2.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As a principle of industrial and spatial organisation, self-management enabled Yugoslavia to shape its own socialism after the breakup with the Soviet Union and the rest of the Eastern Bloc — in 1986. It even represented the paradigmatic element of a proposal for an urban restructuring of New Belgrade submitted by Marxist philosopher Henri Lefebvre and architects Renaudie and Gilbaud. The Yugoslav experience of self-management is not the only one. The oldest precedent probably is the Paris Commune. Bottom-up self-management has unravelled the planet over, in factories of Eastern Europe, neighbourhoods in South American cities, and rural communities in North Africa and the Middle East, to mention some.
This essay will look at self-management as a critical socio-political paradigm inherently connected to spatial determinants and both a means and a goal of reorganising society in the contemporary moment and for the ever nearer future.
The narrative is positioned in a broader temporal context of mass misappropriation of space by mechanisms of power: be it state, corporate, state-corporate, or architectural; the context, that is, of “flat hierarchies” as the new office ping pong tables and bean bags and corporate campuses as the new public spaces, and in the narrower temporal context of a global pandemic forcing a redefinition of public and private, of work and labour relations.
作为工业和空间组织的一项原则,自我管理使南斯拉夫能够在1986年与苏联和东欧集团的其他国家分手后形成自己的社会主义。它甚至代表了马克思主义哲学家Henri Lefebvre和建筑师Renaudie and Gilbaud提出的新贝尔格莱德城市重建建议的范例元素。南斯拉夫的自我管理经验并不是唯一的。最古老的先例可能是巴黎公社。在东欧的工厂,南美城市的社区,以及北非和中东的农村社区,自下而上的自我管理已经瓦解了这个星球。本文将把自我管理作为一种关键的社会政治范式,与空间决定因素内在联系在一起,既是一种手段,也是在当代和更近的未来重组社会的目标。叙事被定位在一个更广泛的时间背景下,即权力机制对空间的大规模滥用:无论是国家、企业、国有企业还是建筑;背景是,“扁平等级”作为新的办公室乒乓球桌和豆袋,企业园区作为新的公共空间,以及在全球流行病迫使重新定义公共和私人,工作和劳资关系的更狭隘的时间背景下。