{"title":"Socio/Poetics","authors":"Ingrid Becker","doi":"10.1353/nlh.2022.0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The intersection of literature, literary studies, and sociology has long been a key site of experimentation. This article contributes to recent debates about applying sociological methods to literary objects and literary modes of interpretation to the objects of sociology through a historical approach. I introduce the term “sociopoetics” to demarcate the characteristics of what I suggest is a literary-historical category of hybrid works that ask to be read both as sociological studies and literary texts at once. Drawing on C. Wright Mills and Kenneth Burke, I define sociopoetics as what Burke has called a “strategy,” a rhetorical gesture that names recurrent yet incompletely articulated social situations. I then trace the development of sociopoetics as a strategy by reading two illustrative texts: Robert and Helen Lynd’s Middletown community studies (1929, 1937), the first best-selling American sociological monographs, and James Agee’s and Walker Evans’s documentary photo-essay Let Us Now Praise Famous Men (1941). I argue that these works grapple with situations of disciplinary impasse while addressing specific social problems that impact human welfare; in particular, they engage with the promise and inadequacy of representing “typical” individuals and social scenarios in the 1930s, a period of crystallization among the disciplines and widespread strife in the US.","PeriodicalId":19150,"journal":{"name":"New Literary History","volume":"53 1","pages":"415 - 440"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Literary History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2022.0019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract:The intersection of literature, literary studies, and sociology has long been a key site of experimentation. This article contributes to recent debates about applying sociological methods to literary objects and literary modes of interpretation to the objects of sociology through a historical approach. I introduce the term “sociopoetics” to demarcate the characteristics of what I suggest is a literary-historical category of hybrid works that ask to be read both as sociological studies and literary texts at once. Drawing on C. Wright Mills and Kenneth Burke, I define sociopoetics as what Burke has called a “strategy,” a rhetorical gesture that names recurrent yet incompletely articulated social situations. I then trace the development of sociopoetics as a strategy by reading two illustrative texts: Robert and Helen Lynd’s Middletown community studies (1929, 1937), the first best-selling American sociological monographs, and James Agee’s and Walker Evans’s documentary photo-essay Let Us Now Praise Famous Men (1941). I argue that these works grapple with situations of disciplinary impasse while addressing specific social problems that impact human welfare; in particular, they engage with the promise and inadequacy of representing “typical” individuals and social scenarios in the 1930s, a period of crystallization among the disciplines and widespread strife in the US.
期刊介绍:
New Literary History focuses on questions of theory, method, interpretation, and literary history. Rather than espousing a single ideology or intellectual framework, it canvasses a wide range of scholarly concerns. By examining the bases of criticism, the journal provokes debate on the relations between literary and cultural texts and present needs. A major international forum for scholarly exchange, New Literary History has received six awards from the Council of Editors of Learned Journals.