Multiple Shades of Grey: Opening the Black Box of Public Sector Executives’ Hybrid Role Identities

S. Leixnering, Andrea Schikowitz, G. Hammerschmid, Renate E. Meyer
{"title":"Multiple Shades of Grey: Opening the Black Box of Public Sector Executives’ Hybrid Role Identities","authors":"S. Leixnering, Andrea Schikowitz, G. Hammerschmid, Renate E. Meyer","doi":"10.1108/S0195-631020180000033012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public sector reforms of recent decades in Europe have promoted managerialism and aimed at introducing private sector thinking and practices. However, with regard to public sector executives' self-understanding, managerial role identities have not replaced bureaucratic ones; rather, components from both paradigms have combined. In this article, we introduce a bi-dimensional approach (attitudes and practices) that allows for different combinations and forms of hybridity. Empirically, we explore the role identities of public sector executives across Europe, building on survey data from over 7,000 top public officials in 19 countries (COCOPS survey). We identify country-level profiles, as well as patterns across countries, and find that administrative traditions can account for these profiles and patterns only to a limited extent. Rather, they have to be complemented by factors such as stability of the institutional environment (indicating lower shares of hybrid combinations) or extent of reform pressures (indicating higher shares of hybrid combinations).","PeriodicalId":84475,"journal":{"name":"Comparative social research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/S0195-631020180000033012","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative social research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0195-631020180000033012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Public sector reforms of recent decades in Europe have promoted managerialism and aimed at introducing private sector thinking and practices. However, with regard to public sector executives' self-understanding, managerial role identities have not replaced bureaucratic ones; rather, components from both paradigms have combined. In this article, we introduce a bi-dimensional approach (attitudes and practices) that allows for different combinations and forms of hybridity. Empirically, we explore the role identities of public sector executives across Europe, building on survey data from over 7,000 top public officials in 19 countries (COCOPS survey). We identify country-level profiles, as well as patterns across countries, and find that administrative traditions can account for these profiles and patterns only to a limited extent. Rather, they have to be complemented by factors such as stability of the institutional environment (indicating lower shares of hybrid combinations) or extent of reform pressures (indicating higher shares of hybrid combinations).
多重灰色阴影:打开公共部门高管混合角色身份的黑匣子
欧洲近几十年的公共部门改革促进了管理主义,旨在引入私营部门的思想和做法。然而,就公共部门高管的自我理解而言,管理角色身份并没有取代官僚身份;相反,两种范式的组成部分结合在一起。在这篇文章中,我们介绍了一种双向方法(态度和实践),它允许不同的组合和混合形式。根据经验,我们基于来自19个国家7000多名高级公职人员的调查数据(COOPS调查),探索了欧洲各地公共部门高管的角色身份。我们确定了国家一级的概况以及各国的模式,并发现行政传统只能在有限的程度上解释这些概况和模式。相反,它们必须辅之以制度环境的稳定性(表明混合组合的份额较低)或改革压力的程度(表示混合组合的比例较高)等因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信