Non-invasive management of initial occlusal enamel caries using silver modified atraumatic restorative technique and resin-based sealants: A randomised comparative split-mouth clinical trial

IF 0.4 Q4 BIOLOGY
Megha Patel, Rohan Bhatt, Chhaya Patel, Kaushal Joshi, Foram Patel, Disha Makwani
{"title":"Non-invasive management of initial occlusal enamel caries using silver modified atraumatic restorative technique and resin-based sealants: A randomised comparative split-mouth clinical trial","authors":"Megha Patel, Rohan Bhatt, Chhaya Patel, Kaushal Joshi, Foram Patel, Disha Makwani","doi":"10.4103/aihb.aihb_196_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Recently, child-friendly non-invasive or minimally invasive approach with the primary goal of preserving tooth structure, the best possible has gained momentum in management of caries disease as compared to conventional invasive surgical approach. The clinical relevance of antimicrobial and remineralising benefits of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) along with atraumatic restorative treatment in managing non-cavitated lesions is yet to be established. This research was conducted with the aim to compare the efficacy of novel silver modified atraumatic restorative technique (SMART) sealants to the gold standard resin-based sealants in managing occlusal enamel caries. Methodology: A total of 66 children with at least one pair of fully erupted contralateral first permanent molars with ICDAS II codes 1 and 2 were randomly allocated for this split-mouth study into two groups: Group - SMART sealant and Group – resin-based sealant. The sealants were applied according to the American Academy of Paediatric Dentistry guidelines and were evaluated at the end of 3rd, 6th, and 12th months. The clinical performance of sealants was gauged based on their retention and caries preventive effect. The data were statistically analysed using the Chi-square test at significance level P < 0.05 using SPSS, IBM version 23.0. Results: At 12 months' follow-up, 60.65% teeth in the resin group and 49.18% in SMART group had fully retentive sealants (P = 0.02). The caries occurrence at the end of the study was 8.19% in SMART as compared to 21.31% in resin sealant group and was statistically significant (P = 0.041). Conclusion: The resin-based sealants were more retentive as compared to SMART; however, the SMART sealants were superior in preventing caries. The use of SDF beneath GIC in atraumatic restorative sealants can provide protective effect against caries occurrence in the absence of sealant retention.","PeriodicalId":7341,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Human Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Human Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aihb.aihb_196_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Recently, child-friendly non-invasive or minimally invasive approach with the primary goal of preserving tooth structure, the best possible has gained momentum in management of caries disease as compared to conventional invasive surgical approach. The clinical relevance of antimicrobial and remineralising benefits of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) along with atraumatic restorative treatment in managing non-cavitated lesions is yet to be established. This research was conducted with the aim to compare the efficacy of novel silver modified atraumatic restorative technique (SMART) sealants to the gold standard resin-based sealants in managing occlusal enamel caries. Methodology: A total of 66 children with at least one pair of fully erupted contralateral first permanent molars with ICDAS II codes 1 and 2 were randomly allocated for this split-mouth study into two groups: Group - SMART sealant and Group – resin-based sealant. The sealants were applied according to the American Academy of Paediatric Dentistry guidelines and were evaluated at the end of 3rd, 6th, and 12th months. The clinical performance of sealants was gauged based on their retention and caries preventive effect. The data were statistically analysed using the Chi-square test at significance level P < 0.05 using SPSS, IBM version 23.0. Results: At 12 months' follow-up, 60.65% teeth in the resin group and 49.18% in SMART group had fully retentive sealants (P = 0.02). The caries occurrence at the end of the study was 8.19% in SMART as compared to 21.31% in resin sealant group and was statistically significant (P = 0.041). Conclusion: The resin-based sealants were more retentive as compared to SMART; however, the SMART sealants were superior in preventing caries. The use of SDF beneath GIC in atraumatic restorative sealants can provide protective effect against caries occurrence in the absence of sealant retention.
银改性无创修复技术和树脂基封闭剂无创治疗初发性咬合釉质龋:一项随机对照分口临床试验
引言:最近,与传统的有创手术方法相比,以保护牙齿结构为主要目标的儿童友好型无创或微创方法在治疗龋齿方面取得了进展。氟化二胺银(SDF)的抗菌和再矿化益处与无创伤修复治疗在治疗非空洞性病变中的临床相关性尚待确定。本研究旨在比较新型银改性无创伤修复技术(SMART)密封剂与金标准树脂基密封剂在治疗咬合釉质龋方面的疗效。方法:将66名至少有一对完全萌出的对侧第一恒磨牙(ICDAS II代码为1和2)的儿童随机分为两组:SMART组和树脂基密封剂组。根据美国儿科牙科学会指南使用密封剂,并在第3、6和12个月底进行评估。根据封闭剂的固位和防龋效果来衡量其临床性能。使用SPSS,IBM 23.0版,采用卡方检验对数据进行统计学分析,显著性水平为P<0.05。结果:在12个月的随访中,树脂组60.65%的牙齿和SMART组49.18%的牙齿具有完全固位性密封剂(P=0.02)。研究结束时,SMART的龋齿发生率为8.19%,而树脂密封剂组为21.31%,具有统计学意义(P=0.041);然而,SMART密封剂在预防龋齿方面是优越的。在无创伤修复性密封剂中,在GIC下方使用SDF可以在没有密封剂保留的情况下对龋齿的发生提供保护作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信