Collaboration, competition and conflict: The collective labour of fashion photography at US Vogue (1940‐42)

IF 0.3 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Marlène Van de Casteele
{"title":"Collaboration, competition and conflict: The collective labour of fashion photography at US Vogue (1940‐42)","authors":"Marlène Van de Casteele","doi":"10.1386/infs_00050_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While the figure of the fashion photographer has been widely discussed, little has been written on image-making as a collective endeavour. Fashion photography indeed results from technical innovations, publishing strategies, editorial policies, behind-the-scenes negotiations and, ultimately,\n decision-making. This article analyses ‘The Condé Nast Papers’ ‐ a series of internal documents held at the Condé Nast archives in New York ‐ together with US Vogue and Harper’s Bazaar’s editorials and covers to explore how\n fashion photographs resulted from the collective labour of photographers, editors, artistic directors and many others in the early 1940s. Through these unique historical sources, this article gives a voice to the workers involved in the making of fashion images and shows how decision-making\n and creativity were distributed across occupations. It also unpacks the negotiations, arbitrations and power relations that underpinned work relations at US Vogue, showing the collaboration, competition and conflict between the different actors. Drawing on art sociologist Howard Becker’s\n concept of ‘art worlds’ while combining methods from fashion history and visual and material culture, I question the respective status of the multiple authors involved in this activity and the conventions of fashion image-making. In doing so, I argue that fashion photographs are\n the product of the interactions of a multitude of workers who are embedded in the power structures of the fashion media industry, and whose collective labour is made invisible. My goal is to rethink the ways in which collective labour has been evidenced and produced in the fashion industry.","PeriodicalId":42103,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Fashion Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Fashion Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/infs_00050_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While the figure of the fashion photographer has been widely discussed, little has been written on image-making as a collective endeavour. Fashion photography indeed results from technical innovations, publishing strategies, editorial policies, behind-the-scenes negotiations and, ultimately, decision-making. This article analyses ‘The Condé Nast Papers’ ‐ a series of internal documents held at the Condé Nast archives in New York ‐ together with US Vogue and Harper’s Bazaar’s editorials and covers to explore how fashion photographs resulted from the collective labour of photographers, editors, artistic directors and many others in the early 1940s. Through these unique historical sources, this article gives a voice to the workers involved in the making of fashion images and shows how decision-making and creativity were distributed across occupations. It also unpacks the negotiations, arbitrations and power relations that underpinned work relations at US Vogue, showing the collaboration, competition and conflict between the different actors. Drawing on art sociologist Howard Becker’s concept of ‘art worlds’ while combining methods from fashion history and visual and material culture, I question the respective status of the multiple authors involved in this activity and the conventions of fashion image-making. In doing so, I argue that fashion photographs are the product of the interactions of a multitude of workers who are embedded in the power structures of the fashion media industry, and whose collective labour is made invisible. My goal is to rethink the ways in which collective labour has been evidenced and produced in the fashion industry.
合作、竞争与冲突:美国《Vogue》时尚摄影的集体劳动(1940-42)
虽然时尚摄影师的形象已经被广泛讨论,但很少有人将图像制作作为一项集体努力。时尚摄影确实是技术创新、出版策略、编辑政策、幕后谈判以及最终决策的结果。本文分析了《康泰纳仕文件》(The CondéNast Papers)——一系列保存在纽约康泰纳士档案馆的内部文件——以及美国《Vogue》和《Harper’s Bazaar》的社论和封面,以探讨时尚照片是如何在20世纪40年代初由摄影师、编辑、艺术总监和许多其他人的集体劳动产生的。通过这些独特的历史来源,本文为参与时尚形象制作的工人发出了声音,并展示了决策和创造力是如何分布在不同职业中的。它还揭示了支撑美国《Vogue》工作关系的谈判、仲裁和权力关系,展示了不同行为者之间的合作、竞争和冲突。借鉴艺术社会学家霍华德·贝克尔的“艺术世界”概念,结合时尚史、视觉和物质文化的方法,我质疑参与这一活动的多位作者的各自地位以及时尚形象制作的惯例。在这样做的过程中,我认为时尚照片是嵌入时尚媒体行业权力结构的众多工人互动的产物,他们的集体劳动是无形的。我的目标是重新思考集体劳动在时尚行业中的表现和产生方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Fashion Studies
International Journal of Fashion Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信