The Many Sides of Business Model Innovation

IF 2.6 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Christopher L. Tucci
{"title":"The Many Sides of Business Model Innovation","authors":"Christopher L. Tucci","doi":"10.1017/mor.2021.82","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I enjoyed reading the paper ‘Business model innovation and experimentation in transforming economies: ByteDance and TikTok’ (Ma & Hu, 2021) and the response by Li (forthcoming). The main point of Ma and Hu’s paper was that companies in emerging economies can experiment with new business models in their home markets and then bring some of that experimentation into other markets. It is sort of the ‘reverse innovation’ (e.g., Govindarajan & Euchner, 2012) taken from the product space and applied to new business models. The role of technology in this story is to enable new services originally targeting a different demographic with a different medium (cf., Amit, Snihur, & Zott, 2021). Li (forthcoming) has a problem with this interpretation of the ByteDance case. He argues that ByteDance had very little business model innovation (BMI) but rather took a savvy approach to internationalization. Li argues that the role of technology in the ByteDance case is more of a means for reducing ‘paradoxical’ tensions between local responsiveness and global integration, i.e., for enabling not business model innovation but rather ‘transnational’ strategies as developed by Bartlett and Ghoshal (1989). What does it take for a company to be successful over the long term?We know that it requires a great strategy, excellent operations, financial controls, effective marketing, a solid business model, routines for ‘future-proofing’, and so forth. There are many elements that need to interact for company success. So it is natural that when we see a successful company, different people, depending on their disciplinary background, can attribute different elements as the ‘main reason’ why a company is successful. Furthermore, what does ‘business model innovation’ actually mean (cf., Massa & Tucci, 2021)? There have been many different definitions published over the years (see Foss & Saebi, 2017 for a more complete discussion). The lowest bar probably addresses the question: has any one conceptual component or element of a business model (cf., Abdelkafi, Makhotin, & Posselt, 2013; Afuah &","PeriodicalId":47798,"journal":{"name":"Management and Organization Review","volume":"18 1","pages":"209 - 211"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management and Organization Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2021.82","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

I enjoyed reading the paper ‘Business model innovation and experimentation in transforming economies: ByteDance and TikTok’ (Ma & Hu, 2021) and the response by Li (forthcoming). The main point of Ma and Hu’s paper was that companies in emerging economies can experiment with new business models in their home markets and then bring some of that experimentation into other markets. It is sort of the ‘reverse innovation’ (e.g., Govindarajan & Euchner, 2012) taken from the product space and applied to new business models. The role of technology in this story is to enable new services originally targeting a different demographic with a different medium (cf., Amit, Snihur, & Zott, 2021). Li (forthcoming) has a problem with this interpretation of the ByteDance case. He argues that ByteDance had very little business model innovation (BMI) but rather took a savvy approach to internationalization. Li argues that the role of technology in the ByteDance case is more of a means for reducing ‘paradoxical’ tensions between local responsiveness and global integration, i.e., for enabling not business model innovation but rather ‘transnational’ strategies as developed by Bartlett and Ghoshal (1989). What does it take for a company to be successful over the long term?We know that it requires a great strategy, excellent operations, financial controls, effective marketing, a solid business model, routines for ‘future-proofing’, and so forth. There are many elements that need to interact for company success. So it is natural that when we see a successful company, different people, depending on their disciplinary background, can attribute different elements as the ‘main reason’ why a company is successful. Furthermore, what does ‘business model innovation’ actually mean (cf., Massa & Tucci, 2021)? There have been many different definitions published over the years (see Foss & Saebi, 2017 for a more complete discussion). The lowest bar probably addresses the question: has any one conceptual component or element of a business model (cf., Abdelkafi, Makhotin, & Posselt, 2013; Afuah &
商业模式创新的多方面
我很喜欢阅读《转型经济中的商业模式创新和实验:字节跳动和TikTok》(马和胡,2021)和李的回应(即将发表)。马和胡论文的主要观点是,新兴经济体的公司可以在本国市场试验新的商业模式,然后将一些试验引入其他市场。这是一种“反向创新”(例如,Govindarajan&Euchner,2012),取自产品领域,并应用于新的商业模式。技术在这个故事中的作用是通过不同的媒介实现最初针对不同人群的新服务(参见,Amit,Snihur,&Zott,2021)。李(即将发表)对字节跳动案的这种解释有意见。他认为,字节跳动几乎没有商业模式创新,而是采取了精明的国际化方法。李认为,技术在字节跳动案中的作用更多的是一种手段,可以缓解当地响应能力和全球一体化之间的“矛盾”紧张关系,即不是实现商业模式创新,而是实现Bartlett和Ghoshal(1989)制定的“跨国”战略。一个公司要想长期成功需要什么?我们知道,它需要伟大的战略、卓越的运营、财务控制、有效的营销、坚实的商业模式、“经得起未来考验”的常规等等。有许多因素需要相互作用才能使公司成功。因此,当我们看到一家成功的公司时,不同的人,根据他们的学科背景,可以将不同的因素视为一家公司成功的“主要原因”,这是很自然的。此外,“商业模式创新”实际上意味着什么(参见Massa&Tucci,2021)?多年来发表了许多不同的定义(更完整的讨论见Foss&Saebi,2017)。最低标准可能解决了这个问题:商业模式中有任何一个概念组成部分或元素(参见,Abdelkafi,Makhotin,&Poselt,2013;Afuah&
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信