儒家視角下的超人類主義反思——如何監管我們的後人類未來?

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 Q4 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Jue Wang
{"title":"儒家視角下的超人類主義反思——如何監管我們的後人類未來?","authors":"Jue Wang","doi":"10.24112/ijccpm.191951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English. \n隨著高科技操縱人類生命的潛力日益明顯,超人類主義運動也愈加受到學界重視,相關研究飛速增長,但尚缺乏一種基於儒家視角的系統研究。本文試圖表明儒家視角對反思超人類主義具有不可替代的重要性,不僅因為它可以幫助我們更清晰、更深刻地把握超人類主義的影響和風險,而且因為它可以在超人類主義的技術主義圖景之外,提供想像和監管我們後人類未來的另一種可能性。具體而言,本研究致力於在一種隱含比較視域下展開儒家的批判性視角,從儒家“天人合一”觀念出發,闡釋儒家為什麼不能接受超人類主義,並嘗試探索儒家反對超人類主義的倫理理由與西方生物保守主義的同異之處。由此,本文嘗試將不同文化來源的思想帶入對話中,既是通過它們分歧之處,更是要通過它們共同關懷的議題,來更好地思考,超人類主義計劃對人類社會、對人類未來意味著什麼,並回答“如何監管我們的後人類未來”這一至關重要的問題。 \nAs the potential of high technology to manipulate human life becomes increasingly evident, the transhumanist movement is receiving greater scholarly attention, and the number of related research projects is growing exponentially. However, systematic research from a Confucian perspective is still lacking. This paper attempts to demonstrate the unique value of a Confucian perspective in reflecting on transhumanism. Confucian thought can not only help us grasp the implications and risks of transhumanism with clarity and depth but also offer alternative possibilities for imagining as well as regulating our posthuman future beyond the technocratic picture of transhumanism. Specifically, this paper develops a critical Confucian perspective in an implicitly comparative context to explain why Confucianism cannot accept transhumanism (due to the Confucian notion of “the unity of heaven and man”(天人合一)and to explore the similarities and differences between Confucian and bio-conservative perspectives on transhumanism. I thereby bring ideas from different cultural sources into dialogue to form a better understanding of what transhumanism means for human society and its future, and to answer the crucial question of how to regulate our posthuman future.","PeriodicalId":41284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24112/ijccpm.191951","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English. 隨著高科技操縱人類生命的潛力日益明顯,超人類主義運動也愈加受到學界重視,相關研究飛速增長,但尚缺乏一種基於儒家視角的系統研究。本文試圖表明儒家視角對反思超人類主義具有不可替代的重要性,不僅因為它可以幫助我們更清晰、更深刻地把握超人類主義的影響和風險,而且因為它可以在超人類主義的技術主義圖景之外,提供想像和監管我們後人類未來的另一種可能性。具體而言,本研究致力於在一種隱含比較視域下展開儒家的批判性視角,從儒家“天人合一”觀念出發,闡釋儒家為什麼不能接受超人類主義,並嘗試探索儒家反對超人類主義的倫理理由與西方生物保守主義的同異之處。由此,本文嘗試將不同文化來源的思想帶入對話中,既是通過它們分歧之處,更是要通過它們共同關懷的議題,來更好地思考,超人類主義計劃對人類社會、對人類未來意味著什麼,並回答“如何監管我們的後人類未來”這一至關重要的問題。 As the potential of high technology to manipulate human life becomes increasingly evident, the transhumanist movement is receiving greater scholarly attention, and the number of related research projects is growing exponentially. However, systematic research from a Confucian perspective is still lacking. This paper attempts to demonstrate the unique value of a Confucian perspective in reflecting on transhumanism. Confucian thought can not only help us grasp the implications and risks of transhumanism with clarity and depth but also offer alternative possibilities for imagining as well as regulating our posthuman future beyond the technocratic picture of transhumanism. Specifically, this paper develops a critical Confucian perspective in an implicitly comparative context to explain why Confucianism cannot accept transhumanism (due to the Confucian notion of “the unity of heaven and man”(天人合一)and to explore the similarities and differences between Confucian and bio-conservative perspectives on transhumanism. I thereby bring ideas from different cultural sources into dialogue to form a better understanding of what transhumanism means for human society and its future, and to answer the crucial question of how to regulate our posthuman future.
儒家视角下的超人类主义反思——如何监管我们的后人类未来?
LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English. 随著高科技操纵人类生命的潜力日益明显,超人类主义运动也愈加受到学界重视,相关研究飞速增长,但尚缺乏一种基于儒家视角的系统研究。本文试图表明儒家视角对反思超人类主义具有不可替代的重要性,不仅因为它可以帮助我们更清晰、更深刻地把握超人类主义的影响和风险,而且因为它可以在超人类主义的技术主义图景之外,提供想像和监管我们后人类未来的另一种可能性。具体而言,本研究致力于在一种隐含比较视域下展开儒家的批判性视角,从儒家“天人合一”观念出发,阐释儒家为什么不能接受超人类主义,并尝试探索儒家反对超人类主义的伦理理由与西方生物保守主义的同异之处。由此,本文尝试将不同文化来源的思想带入对话中,既是通过它们分歧之处,更是要通过它们共同关怀的议题,来更好地思考,超人类主义计划对人类社会、对人类未来意味著什么,并回答“如何监管我们的后人类未来”这一至关重要的问题。 As the potential of high technology to manipulate human life becomes increasingly evident, the transhumanist movement is receiving greater scholarly attention, and the number of related research projects is growing exponentially. However, systematic research from a Confucian perspective is still lacking. This paper attempts to demonstrate the unique value of a Confucian perspective in reflecting on transhumanism. Confucian thought can not only help us grasp the implications and risks of transhumanism with clarity and depth but also offer alternative possibilities for imagining as well as regulating our posthuman future beyond the technocratic picture of transhumanism. Specifically, this paper develops a critical Confucian perspective in an implicitly comparative context to explain why Confucianism cannot accept transhumanism (due to the Confucian notion of “the unity of heaven and man”(天人合一)and to explore the similarities and differences between Confucian and bio-conservative perspectives on transhumanism. I thereby bring ideas from different cultural sources into dialogue to form a better understanding of what transhumanism means for human society and its future, and to answer the crucial question of how to regulate our posthuman future.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信