Using Certifications to Signal Trustworthiness and Reduce the Perceived Risk of Donors – An Exploratory Investigation into the Impact of Charity Labels

IF 1.3 Q3 BUSINESS
S. Stötzer, Sebastian F. Martin, Christiana Broidl
{"title":"Using Certifications to Signal Trustworthiness and Reduce the Perceived Risk of Donors – An Exploratory Investigation into the Impact of Charity Labels","authors":"S. Stötzer, Sebastian F. Martin, Christiana Broidl","doi":"10.1080/10495142.2021.1954131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Several accountability clubs and watchdogs issue charity labels for stimulating charitable giving, but research on the impact of such seals of approval built on certification systems is still narrow and contradictory. Based on signaling theory and theory of perceived risk, we develop a framework matching means of signaling trustworthiness by charities and of risk reducing by donors. Additionally, we present results of a study exploring the influence of the Austrian charity label “OSGS” on the donation behavior of 192 survey participants and investigate whether donors are more willing to support charities participating in this self-regulatory program. Our study provides insights into the benefits and constraints of voluntary accountability initiatives and enhances understanding of individuals’ motivations for giving. Findings indicate that expectations toward the OSGS are high and partly exaggerated. Nevertheless, we found that generally the OSGS is not crucial for charity choice but mainly beneficial for nonprofits not widely known.","PeriodicalId":46735,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing","volume":"35 1","pages":"265 - 289"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10495142.2021.1954131","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2021.1954131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT Several accountability clubs and watchdogs issue charity labels for stimulating charitable giving, but research on the impact of such seals of approval built on certification systems is still narrow and contradictory. Based on signaling theory and theory of perceived risk, we develop a framework matching means of signaling trustworthiness by charities and of risk reducing by donors. Additionally, we present results of a study exploring the influence of the Austrian charity label “OSGS” on the donation behavior of 192 survey participants and investigate whether donors are more willing to support charities participating in this self-regulatory program. Our study provides insights into the benefits and constraints of voluntary accountability initiatives and enhances understanding of individuals’ motivations for giving. Findings indicate that expectations toward the OSGS are high and partly exaggerated. Nevertheless, we found that generally the OSGS is not crucial for charity choice but mainly beneficial for nonprofits not widely known.
利用认证来表明捐赠者的可信度并降低其感知风险——慈善标签影响的探索性调查
一些问责俱乐部和监管机构为鼓励慈善捐赠而发放慈善标签,但对这种建立在认证制度基础上的批准印章的影响的研究仍然是狭隘和矛盾的。基于信号理论和感知风险理论,我们开发了一个框架来匹配慈善机构的可信度信号和捐赠者的风险降低信号。此外,我们还提出了一项研究结果,探讨了奥地利慈善标签“OSGS”对192名调查参与者的捐赠行为的影响,并调查了捐赠者是否更愿意支持参与这一自我监管计划的慈善机构。我们的研究提供了对自愿问责倡议的好处和限制的见解,并加强了对个人捐赠动机的理解。调查结果表明,对OSGS的期望很高,而且在一定程度上被夸大了。然而,我们发现,总体而言,OSGS对慈善选择并不重要,而主要对知名度不高的非营利组织有利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信