The Earl of Essex's Last Poem: Texts, Transmission, and Authorship

IF 0.2 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Steven W. May
{"title":"The Earl of Essex's Last Poem: Texts, Transmission, and Authorship","authors":"Steven W. May","doi":"10.1353/sip.2021.0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In late February 1601, while prisoner in the Tower and awaiting execution for treason, Robert Devereux, 2nd Earl of Essex, composed a penitential poem modeled on Robert Southwell's immensely popular \"St. Peter's Complaint.\" My critical edition of the earl's poem (Studies in Philology, 1980) was based on eleven texts. Since then another halfdozen versions of the poem have come to light. They reveal how Essex's last brush with the Muses became one of the most popular and widely distributed poems of the early Stuart era. Meanwhile, in 2016, Hugh Gazzard's article in Studies in English Literature revived Nicholas Breton's claim to the poem. Breton has been credited with it since 1867 on wholly stylistic grounds, for there is no contemporary attribution to Breton or anyone else, only five manuscript attributions to Essex. Gazzard offers the most extensive analysis to date of parallel passages in Breton's verse and Essex's poem; he argues that they reveal Breton's responsibility for the work. I contest this analysis by showing that these passages are for the most part neither parallel nor unique and that the methodology itself can be used to show that other poets are just as likely, indeed far more likely, to have written it. The important takeaway here is that the \"parallel passages\" methodology as a test for authorship must be used, if at all, with extreme caution. In this case it in no way challenges Essex's authorship of this, his last poem.","PeriodicalId":45500,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN PHILOLOGY","volume":"118 1","pages":"698 - 724"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STUDIES IN PHILOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sip.2021.0025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:In late February 1601, while prisoner in the Tower and awaiting execution for treason, Robert Devereux, 2nd Earl of Essex, composed a penitential poem modeled on Robert Southwell's immensely popular "St. Peter's Complaint." My critical edition of the earl's poem (Studies in Philology, 1980) was based on eleven texts. Since then another halfdozen versions of the poem have come to light. They reveal how Essex's last brush with the Muses became one of the most popular and widely distributed poems of the early Stuart era. Meanwhile, in 2016, Hugh Gazzard's article in Studies in English Literature revived Nicholas Breton's claim to the poem. Breton has been credited with it since 1867 on wholly stylistic grounds, for there is no contemporary attribution to Breton or anyone else, only five manuscript attributions to Essex. Gazzard offers the most extensive analysis to date of parallel passages in Breton's verse and Essex's poem; he argues that they reveal Breton's responsibility for the work. I contest this analysis by showing that these passages are for the most part neither parallel nor unique and that the methodology itself can be used to show that other poets are just as likely, indeed far more likely, to have written it. The important takeaway here is that the "parallel passages" methodology as a test for authorship must be used, if at all, with extreme caution. In this case it in no way challenges Essex's authorship of this, his last poem.
埃塞克斯伯爵的最后一首诗:文本、传播和作者
摘要:1601年2月下旬,埃塞克斯郡第二代伯爵罗伯特·德弗罗因叛国罪被关押在塔里等待处决,他根据罗伯特·索斯韦尔广受欢迎的《圣彼得的控诉》创作了一首忏悔诗。从那时起,这首诗的另外六个版本被曝光了。它们揭示了埃塞克斯与缪斯的最后一次接触是如何成为斯图尔特时代早期最受欢迎、分布最广的诗歌之一的。与此同时,2016年,休·加扎德在《英国文学研究》上发表的文章再次提出了尼古拉斯·布雷顿对这首诗的主张。自1867年以来,布列塔尼一直被认为完全是出于风格上的原因,因为布列塔尼或其他任何人都没有当代归属,只有五份手稿归属于埃塞克斯郡。Gazzard对布雷顿诗歌和埃塞克斯诗歌中的平行段落进行了迄今为止最广泛的分析;他认为,它们揭示了布雷顿对这项工作的责任。我对这一分析提出质疑,因为我认为这些段落在很大程度上既不是平行的,也不是独特的,而且方法本身可以用来表明其他诗人也有可能,甚至更有可能写下这篇文章。这里的重要结论是,作为作者身份测试的“平行段落”方法必须非常谨慎地使用。在这种情况下,它决不会挑战埃塞克斯的作者,这是他的最后一首诗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Founded in 1903, Studies in Philology addresses scholars in a wide range of disciplines, though traditionally its strength has been English Medieval and Renaissance studies. SIP publishes articles on British literature before 1900 and on relations between British literature and works in the Classical, Romance, and Germanic Languages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信