Effects of Electrolytes and Soil-to-suspension Ratios on pH in Acidic-coarse Textured Soil

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
S. Butnan, P. Sriraj, B. Toomsan
{"title":"Effects of Electrolytes and Soil-to-suspension Ratios on pH in Acidic-coarse Textured Soil","authors":"S. Butnan, P. Sriraj, B. Toomsan","doi":"10.18805/ijare.af-785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Soil pH is determined using a variety of methods. The key differences among them are the electrolytes and soil-to-suspension ratios. However, an optimal procedure tailored to a particular soil is required. This study, therefore, aimed to evaluate the effects of electrolytes and soil-to-suspension ratios on soil pH and to optimise pH measurement methods for acidic-coarsely textured soil. Methods: Varied standard electrolytes (water, 0.01 M CaCl2 and 1 M KCl) and soil-to-suspension ratios (1:1, 1:2.5 and 1:5 w/v) were used to measure the pH of thirty samples of acidic-coarsest textured soil. Result: Soil pH values were observed in the following order: water greater than 0.01 M CaCl2 greater than 1 M KCI. Higher soil pHs were a result of higher suspension volumes. The most optimal pH measurement method for an acidic-coarsely textured soil was obtained from the 1:2.5 soil-to-suspension ratio of 1 M KCl, which held the highest R2 (0.850), as well as the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) (0.010), indicating the most precise method. An alternative method suitable for a cost-saving laboratory was the 1:1 soil-to-suspension ratio of 0.01 M CaCl2, which owned R2 of 0.766 and RMSE of 0.013, as its pH measurement was similar to those under the most optimal method.","PeriodicalId":13398,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal Of Agricultural Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal Of Agricultural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18805/ijare.af-785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Soil pH is determined using a variety of methods. The key differences among them are the electrolytes and soil-to-suspension ratios. However, an optimal procedure tailored to a particular soil is required. This study, therefore, aimed to evaluate the effects of electrolytes and soil-to-suspension ratios on soil pH and to optimise pH measurement methods for acidic-coarsely textured soil. Methods: Varied standard electrolytes (water, 0.01 M CaCl2 and 1 M KCl) and soil-to-suspension ratios (1:1, 1:2.5 and 1:5 w/v) were used to measure the pH of thirty samples of acidic-coarsest textured soil. Result: Soil pH values were observed in the following order: water greater than 0.01 M CaCl2 greater than 1 M KCI. Higher soil pHs were a result of higher suspension volumes. The most optimal pH measurement method for an acidic-coarsely textured soil was obtained from the 1:2.5 soil-to-suspension ratio of 1 M KCl, which held the highest R2 (0.850), as well as the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) (0.010), indicating the most precise method. An alternative method suitable for a cost-saving laboratory was the 1:1 soil-to-suspension ratio of 0.01 M CaCl2, which owned R2 of 0.766 and RMSE of 0.013, as its pH measurement was similar to those under the most optimal method.
电解质和土悬比对酸性-粗质土pH的影响
背景:土壤pH值的测定方法多种多样。它们之间的关键区别在于电解质和土壤与悬浮液的比率。然而,需要一种适合特定土壤的最佳程序。因此,本研究旨在评估电解质和土壤悬浮比对土壤pH的影响,并优化酸性粗糙土壤的pH测量方法。方法:采用不同的标准电解质(水、0.01 M CaCl2和1 M KCl)和土悬液比(1:1、1:2.5和1:5 w/v)测量30个酸性最粗质地土壤样品的pH值。结果:土壤pH值依次为:水> 0.01 M CaCl2 > 1 M KCI。较高的土壤ph值是悬浮体积增大的结果。对于酸性粗质土壤,以1 M KCl的土悬比1:2.5为最佳pH测量方法,其R2最高(0.850),均方根误差(RMSE)最低(0.010),是最精确的测量方法。另一种适合节省实验室成本的方法是1:1土悬比0.01 M CaCl2,由于其pH值与最优方法相似,其R2为0.766,RMSE为0.013。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal Of Agricultural Research
Indian Journal Of Agricultural Research Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Soil Science
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信