Santiago Toledo , Veronica Gargaglione , Laura Yahdjian , Pablo L. Peri
{"title":"Differential responses of soil microorganisms to precipitation changes in austral semiarid grasslands","authors":"Santiago Toledo , Veronica Gargaglione , Laura Yahdjian , Pablo L. Peri","doi":"10.1016/j.pedobi.2023.150873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Global climate models predict that precipitation regimes will change, generating great impacts on various ecosystem processes and functions. Therefore, it is important to know how drought and precipitation increases would affect the soil microorganims and plants. We established a precipitation manipulation experiment, with treatments ranging from 54% reduction (drought) to 54% increases (irrigation) in a semiarid ecosystem, and measured microbial carbon (MBC) and nitrogen (MBN), soil basal respiration (SBR), microbial metabolic coefficients (qCO<sub>2</sub>), and estimated the sequestration and fluxes of CO<sub>2</sub> by soil microorganisms. While simulated drought did not modify the microbial community attributes, the microbial biomass increased with greater precipitation, which in the long term could lead to greater carbon (C) sequestration by the microbial pathway and a decline in potential CO<sub>2</sub> emissions into the atmosphere. This study shows that microorganisms of the semiarid soil are able to withstand drought and are possibly able to adopt resistance mechanisms under dry conditions. However, drought or increased precipitation did not affect SBR. The results showed that plants’ and soil microorganisms’ responses to precipitation change were asymmetric and different. The study quantifies the contributions of microorganisms to sequestered C by soil microbial biomass (≈35 g MBC m<sup>−2</sup>) and CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes to the atmosphere (removed in MBC ≈127 g CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> and emission by SBR ≈876 g CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>−2</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>) in semiarid ecosystems. This study not only increases our understanding of the adaptation of soil microorganisms to precipitation changes but also provides new insight into the contributions of the microorganisms when modeling and projecting implications for C cycling.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49711,"journal":{"name":"Pedobiologia","volume":"97 ","pages":"Article 150873"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedobiologia","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031405623000112","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Global climate models predict that precipitation regimes will change, generating great impacts on various ecosystem processes and functions. Therefore, it is important to know how drought and precipitation increases would affect the soil microorganims and plants. We established a precipitation manipulation experiment, with treatments ranging from 54% reduction (drought) to 54% increases (irrigation) in a semiarid ecosystem, and measured microbial carbon (MBC) and nitrogen (MBN), soil basal respiration (SBR), microbial metabolic coefficients (qCO2), and estimated the sequestration and fluxes of CO2 by soil microorganisms. While simulated drought did not modify the microbial community attributes, the microbial biomass increased with greater precipitation, which in the long term could lead to greater carbon (C) sequestration by the microbial pathway and a decline in potential CO2 emissions into the atmosphere. This study shows that microorganisms of the semiarid soil are able to withstand drought and are possibly able to adopt resistance mechanisms under dry conditions. However, drought or increased precipitation did not affect SBR. The results showed that plants’ and soil microorganisms’ responses to precipitation change were asymmetric and different. The study quantifies the contributions of microorganisms to sequestered C by soil microbial biomass (≈35 g MBC m−2) and CO2 fluxes to the atmosphere (removed in MBC ≈127 g CO2 m−2 and emission by SBR ≈876 g CO2 m−2 yr−1) in semiarid ecosystems. This study not only increases our understanding of the adaptation of soil microorganisms to precipitation changes but also provides new insight into the contributions of the microorganisms when modeling and projecting implications for C cycling.
全球气候模式预测降水状况将发生变化,对各种生态系统过程和功能产生重大影响。因此,了解干旱和降水增加对土壤微生物和植物的影响是非常重要的。在半干旱生态系统中建立了减少54%(干旱)到增加54%(灌溉)的降水调控试验,测定了土壤微生物碳(MBC)和氮(MBN)、土壤基础呼吸(SBR)、微生物代谢系数(qCO2),并估算了土壤微生物对CO2的封存和通量。虽然模拟干旱没有改变微生物群落属性,但随着降水的增加,微生物生物量增加,从长远来看,这可能导致微生物途径的碳(C)固存增加,并减少潜在的二氧化碳排放到大气中。本研究表明,半干旱土壤微生物具有抗旱能力,在干旱条件下可能具有抗旱机制。然而,干旱或降水增加对SBR没有影响。结果表明,植物和土壤微生物对降水变化的响应不对称且存在差异。该研究量化了半干旱生态系统中微生物对土壤微生物生物量(≈35 g MBC m−2)和大气CO2通量(MBC去除≈127 g CO2 m−2,SBR排放≈876 g CO2 m−2 yr−1)的贡献。这项研究不仅增加了我们对土壤微生物对降水变化的适应的理解,而且为微生物在模拟和预测碳循环的影响时的贡献提供了新的见解。
期刊介绍:
Pedobiologia publishes peer reviewed articles describing original work in the field of soil ecology, which includes the study of soil organisms and their interactions with factors in their biotic and abiotic environments.
Analysis of biological structures, interactions, functions, and processes in soil is fundamental for understanding the dynamical nature of terrestrial ecosystems, a prerequisite for appropriate soil management. The scope of this journal consists of fundamental and applied aspects of soil ecology; key focal points include interactions among organisms in soil, organismal controls on soil processes, causes and consequences of soil biodiversity, and aboveground-belowground interactions.
We publish:
original research that tests clearly defined hypotheses addressing topics of current interest in soil ecology (including studies demonstrating nonsignificant effects);
descriptions of novel methodological approaches, or evaluations of current approaches, that address a clear need in soil ecology research;
innovative syntheses of the soil ecology literature, including metaanalyses, topical in depth reviews and short opinion/perspective pieces, and descriptions of original conceptual frameworks; and
short notes reporting novel observations of ecological significance.