Do Systemic Inequities Lead to Differences Between Information Behaviors of Older Adults in the USA and India During the COVID-19 Pandemic?

IF 0.4 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
C. Fena
{"title":"Do Systemic Inequities Lead to Differences Between Information Behaviors of Older Adults in the USA and India During the COVID-19 Pandemic?","authors":"C. Fena","doi":"10.18438/eblip30257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A Review of:\nLund, B. D., & Maurya, S. K. (2022). How older adults in the USA and India seek information during the COVID-19 pandemic: A comparative study of information behavior. IFLA Journal, 48(1), 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352211024675  \nObjective – To investigate and compare the information-seeking behaviors of older adults in one developing and one developed country during the COVID-19 pandemic.\nDesign – Structured interviews via Zoom (video), telephone, or email.\nSetting – Two towns with moderately large populations (about 300,000), one in eastern India and one in the Midwest of the USA.\nSubjects – Sixty adults ages 65 and older, 35 in the India cohort and 25 in the USA cohort.\nMethods – The researchers recruited participants from the communities in which their respective institutions are located by using online advertisements in Facebook groups, local (print) advertisements/flyers, and word of mouth. The ten interview questions were informed by Dervin’s (1998) sense-making methodology and sought to identify a specific information need, behavior to address the need, and the influences on and outcomes of the behavior. They conducted the interviews in July and August of 2020, translated the questions into Hindi for Hindi-speaking participants, and analyzed responses using qualitative content analysis. Within each of the resulting themes and categories, the researchers compared the responses of American and Indian participants.\nMain Results – The researchers found many significant differences between the information behaviors of Indian and American participants. Some of the biggest differences were in the information needs expressed by the participants, as well as the sources consulted and the reasons for consulting those sources. For example, when asked about the types of information needed, 77% of Indians focused on a “COVID and health-related” information need, as opposed to only 33% of Americans. And 37% of Americans indicated information needs related to “political and economic issues,” especially the upcoming 2020 election, as opposed to only 3% of Indians. When asked about sources, 28% of Indians consulted television, compared to only 6% of Americans. Web-based sources were generally used more by Americans, with 31% of Americans consulting websites, compared to 13% of Indians. In regard to their reasons for consulting a source, 28% of Indians chose a source based on availability, compared to only 9% of Americans. And 32% and 36% of Americans chose information based on ease and familiarity (“I know how to find it”), compared to only 18% and 13% of Indians, respectively. Only 3% of Indians met all their information needs, as opposed to 43% of Americans, and Indians were more likely to stop searching after encountering barriers. Americans had more confidence in their information behavior overall, and only 32% of Americans were interested in taking a class on how to find information, as opposed to 97% of Indians.\nConclusion – Older adults in developing and developed countries described very different information-seeking experiences. The disparities between the types of information sought, sources consulted, and barriers encountered highlight not only cultural differences, but also systemic inequities that exist between the information infrastructure of the two countries, especially as concerns access to computers and the Internet. The study points to areas for future improvement, including the need for interventions such as information literacy instruction.","PeriodicalId":45227,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip30257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A Review of: Lund, B. D., & Maurya, S. K. (2022). How older adults in the USA and India seek information during the COVID-19 pandemic: A comparative study of information behavior. IFLA Journal, 48(1), 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352211024675   Objective – To investigate and compare the information-seeking behaviors of older adults in one developing and one developed country during the COVID-19 pandemic. Design – Structured interviews via Zoom (video), telephone, or email. Setting – Two towns with moderately large populations (about 300,000), one in eastern India and one in the Midwest of the USA. Subjects – Sixty adults ages 65 and older, 35 in the India cohort and 25 in the USA cohort. Methods – The researchers recruited participants from the communities in which their respective institutions are located by using online advertisements in Facebook groups, local (print) advertisements/flyers, and word of mouth. The ten interview questions were informed by Dervin’s (1998) sense-making methodology and sought to identify a specific information need, behavior to address the need, and the influences on and outcomes of the behavior. They conducted the interviews in July and August of 2020, translated the questions into Hindi for Hindi-speaking participants, and analyzed responses using qualitative content analysis. Within each of the resulting themes and categories, the researchers compared the responses of American and Indian participants. Main Results – The researchers found many significant differences between the information behaviors of Indian and American participants. Some of the biggest differences were in the information needs expressed by the participants, as well as the sources consulted and the reasons for consulting those sources. For example, when asked about the types of information needed, 77% of Indians focused on a “COVID and health-related” information need, as opposed to only 33% of Americans. And 37% of Americans indicated information needs related to “political and economic issues,” especially the upcoming 2020 election, as opposed to only 3% of Indians. When asked about sources, 28% of Indians consulted television, compared to only 6% of Americans. Web-based sources were generally used more by Americans, with 31% of Americans consulting websites, compared to 13% of Indians. In regard to their reasons for consulting a source, 28% of Indians chose a source based on availability, compared to only 9% of Americans. And 32% and 36% of Americans chose information based on ease and familiarity (“I know how to find it”), compared to only 18% and 13% of Indians, respectively. Only 3% of Indians met all their information needs, as opposed to 43% of Americans, and Indians were more likely to stop searching after encountering barriers. Americans had more confidence in their information behavior overall, and only 32% of Americans were interested in taking a class on how to find information, as opposed to 97% of Indians. Conclusion – Older adults in developing and developed countries described very different information-seeking experiences. The disparities between the types of information sought, sources consulted, and barriers encountered highlight not only cultural differences, but also systemic inequities that exist between the information infrastructure of the two countries, especially as concerns access to computers and the Internet. The study points to areas for future improvement, including the need for interventions such as information literacy instruction.
在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,系统性不平等是否导致美国和印度老年人信息行为的差异?
综述:Lund, B. D, & Maurya, S. K.(2022)。美国和印度老年人在COVID-19大流行期间如何寻求信息:一项信息行为的比较研究国际图联学报,48(1),205-215。https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352211024675目的-调查和比较一个发展中国家和一个发达国家在COVID-19大流行期间老年人的信息寻求行为。设计-通过Zoom(视频)、电话或电子邮件进行结构化访谈。背景:两个人口中等的城镇(约30万),一个在印度东部,一个在美国中西部。受试者:60名年龄在65岁及以上的成年人,印度队列35人,美国队列25人。方法:研究人员通过使用Facebook群组中的在线广告、当地(印刷)广告/传单和口口相传的方式,从各自机构所在的社区招募参与者。这十个面试问题采用了Dervin(1998)的意义构建方法,旨在确定特定的信息需求,满足需求的行为,以及对行为的影响和结果。他们在2020年7月和8月进行了访谈,将问题翻译成印地语,供讲印地语的参与者使用,并使用定性内容分析分析了回答。在每个主题和类别中,研究人员比较了美国和印度参与者的反应。研究人员发现印度和美国参与者的信息行为存在许多显著差异。一些最大的差异在于参与者所表达的信息需求,以及咨询的来源和咨询这些来源的原因。例如,当被问及所需的信息类型时,77%的印度人关注的是“COVID和健康相关”的信息需求,而美国人只有33%。37%的美国人表示需要与“政治和经济问题”相关的信息,尤其是即将到来的2020年大选,而印度人只有3%。当被问及信息来源时,28%的印度人咨询电视,而美国人只有6%。美国人通常更多地使用基于网络的资源,31%的美国人使用咨询网站,而印度人的这一比例为13%。至于他们咨询信息来源的原因,28%的印度人根据可用性选择信息来源,而美国人只有9%。32%和36%的美国人选择信息是基于易用性和熟悉度(“我知道如何找到它”),而印度人分别只有18%和13%。只有3%的印度人满足了他们所有的信息需求,而美国人的这一比例为43%,而且印度人更有可能在遇到障碍后停止搜索。总体而言,美国人对自己的信息行为更有信心,只有32%的美国人有兴趣参加如何查找信息的课程,而印度人的这一比例为97%。结论——发展中国家和发达国家的老年人描述了截然不同的信息寻求经历。所寻求的信息类型、咨询的来源和遇到的障碍之间的差异不仅突出了文化差异,而且突出了两国信息基础设施之间存在的系统性不平等,特别是在使用计算机和互联网方面。该研究指出了未来需要改进的领域,包括信息素养教育等干预措施的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
Evidence Based Library and Information Practice INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
44
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信