Traditional therapeutic ultrasound compared with sustained acoustic medicine (SAM). a comparison

David Draper O
{"title":"Traditional therapeutic ultrasound compared with sustained acoustic medicine (SAM). a comparison","authors":"David Draper O","doi":"10.15406/mojsm.2019.03.00072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"VI. Wearable during work or competition. The SAM is different from traditional ultrasound. It runs on a battery, whereas traditional ultrasound is plugged into a wall socket. The size of traditional ultrasound is the size of a 3 ring binder, whereas the SAM is about the size of a TENS unit or cell phone. Traditional ultrasound produces from 2000 to 4000 joules. The SAM can produce up to 18,000 joules when two crystals are used.2 This added energy will speed up healing, pain relief and all the other things. There was a study performed several months ago looking at SAMs ability to decrease pain associated with tendonitis. There was a significant reduction of pain over the 6 week study. Participants started with a 5.3 on the numerical rating scale and ended with a 1.6. There was another study looking at grip strength in subjects with elbow tendinitis. At week 4 there was a significant increase in from baseline to week 2 in grip strength of the injured limb. This increased grip strength was even larger at weeks 4 and 6. A photo of the SAM and traditional ultrasound are now presented. SAM thigh:","PeriodicalId":93216,"journal":{"name":"MOJ sports medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MOJ sports medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/mojsm.2019.03.00072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

VI. Wearable during work or competition. The SAM is different from traditional ultrasound. It runs on a battery, whereas traditional ultrasound is plugged into a wall socket. The size of traditional ultrasound is the size of a 3 ring binder, whereas the SAM is about the size of a TENS unit or cell phone. Traditional ultrasound produces from 2000 to 4000 joules. The SAM can produce up to 18,000 joules when two crystals are used.2 This added energy will speed up healing, pain relief and all the other things. There was a study performed several months ago looking at SAMs ability to decrease pain associated with tendonitis. There was a significant reduction of pain over the 6 week study. Participants started with a 5.3 on the numerical rating scale and ended with a 1.6. There was another study looking at grip strength in subjects with elbow tendinitis. At week 4 there was a significant increase in from baseline to week 2 in grip strength of the injured limb. This increased grip strength was even larger at weeks 4 and 6. A photo of the SAM and traditional ultrasound are now presented. SAM thigh:
传统治疗超声与持续声学医学(SAM)的比较。比较
VI、 可在工作或比赛中穿着。SAM不同于传统的超声波。它使用电池,而传统的超声波是插入墙上的插座。传统超声波的大小是一个3环活页夹的大小,而SAM大约是一个TENS单元或手机的大小。传统的超声波产生2000到4000焦耳的能量。当使用两个晶体时,SAM可以产生高达18000焦耳的能量。2这种增加的能量将加速愈合、疼痛缓解和所有其他事情。几个月前进行了一项研究,研究SAM减轻肌腱炎相关疼痛的能力。在为期6周的研究中,疼痛明显减轻。参与者从数字评分表的5.3分开始,到1.6分结束。另一项研究观察了肘部肌腱炎患者的握力。在第4周,从基线到第2周,受伤肢体的握力显著增加。在第4周和第6周,这种增加的握力甚至更大。现在呈现SAM和传统超声的照片。SAM大腿:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信