Enhancing Ebola Virus Disease Surveillance and Prevention in Counties Without Confirmed Cases in Rural Liberia: Experiences from Sinoe County During the Flare-up in Monrovia, April to June, 2016

PLoS currents Pub Date : 2017-05-19 DOI:10.1101/139154
V. Weah, John S. Doedeh, Samson Q. Wiah, Emmanuel Nyema, Siafa Lombeh, Jeremias D Naiene
{"title":"Enhancing Ebola Virus Disease Surveillance and Prevention in Counties Without Confirmed Cases in Rural Liberia: Experiences from Sinoe County During the Flare-up in Monrovia, April to June, 2016","authors":"V. Weah, John S. Doedeh, Samson Q. Wiah, Emmanuel Nyema, Siafa Lombeh, Jeremias D Naiene","doi":"10.1101/139154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction During the flare-ups of Ebola virus disease (EVD) in Liberia, Sinoe County reactivated the multi-sectorial EVD control strategy in order to be ready to respond to the eventual reintroduction of cases. This paper describes the impacts of the interventions implemented in Sinoe County during the last flare-up in Monrovia, from April 1 to June 9, 2016, using the resources provided during the original outbreak that ended one year back. Methods We conducted a descriptive study to describe the key interventions implemented in Sinoe County, the capacity available, the implications for the reactivation of the multi-sectoral EVD control strategy, and the results of the same. We also conducted a cross-sectional study to analyze the impact of the interventions on the surveillance and on infection prevention and control (IPC). Results The attrition of the staff trained during the original outbreak was low, and most of the supplies, equipment, and infrastructure from the original outbreak remained available. With an additional US$1755, improvements were observed in the IPC indicators of triage, which increased from a mean of 60% during the first assessment to 77% (P=0.002). Additionally, personal/staff training improved from 78% to 89% (P=0.04). The percentage of EVD death alerts per expected deaths investigated increased from 26% to 63% (P<0.0001). Discussion The small attrition of the trained staff and the availability of most of the supplies, equipment, and infrastructure made the reactivation of the multi-sectoral EVD control strategy fast and affordable. The improvement of the EVD surveillance was possibly affected by the community engagement activities, awareness and mentoring of the health workers, and improved availability of clinicians in the facilities during the flare-up. The community engagement may contribute to the report of community-based events, specifically community deaths. The mentoring of the staff during the supportive supervisions also contributed to improve the IPC indicators.","PeriodicalId":74464,"journal":{"name":"PLoS currents","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS currents","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/139154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Introduction During the flare-ups of Ebola virus disease (EVD) in Liberia, Sinoe County reactivated the multi-sectorial EVD control strategy in order to be ready to respond to the eventual reintroduction of cases. This paper describes the impacts of the interventions implemented in Sinoe County during the last flare-up in Monrovia, from April 1 to June 9, 2016, using the resources provided during the original outbreak that ended one year back. Methods We conducted a descriptive study to describe the key interventions implemented in Sinoe County, the capacity available, the implications for the reactivation of the multi-sectoral EVD control strategy, and the results of the same. We also conducted a cross-sectional study to analyze the impact of the interventions on the surveillance and on infection prevention and control (IPC). Results The attrition of the staff trained during the original outbreak was low, and most of the supplies, equipment, and infrastructure from the original outbreak remained available. With an additional US$1755, improvements were observed in the IPC indicators of triage, which increased from a mean of 60% during the first assessment to 77% (P=0.002). Additionally, personal/staff training improved from 78% to 89% (P=0.04). The percentage of EVD death alerts per expected deaths investigated increased from 26% to 63% (P<0.0001). Discussion The small attrition of the trained staff and the availability of most of the supplies, equipment, and infrastructure made the reactivation of the multi-sectoral EVD control strategy fast and affordable. The improvement of the EVD surveillance was possibly affected by the community engagement activities, awareness and mentoring of the health workers, and improved availability of clinicians in the facilities during the flare-up. The community engagement may contribute to the report of community-based events, specifically community deaths. The mentoring of the staff during the supportive supervisions also contributed to improve the IPC indicators.
加强利比里亚农村无确诊病例县的埃博拉病毒疾病监测和预防:2016年4月至6月蒙罗维亚爆发期间西诺县的经验
在利比里亚埃博拉病毒病暴发期间,锡诺县重新启动了多部门埃博拉病毒病控制战略,以便准备应对最终再次出现的病例。本文描述了2016年4月1日至6月9日在蒙罗维亚最后一次疫情暴发期间在锡诺县实施的干预措施的影响,使用了一年前结束的第一次疫情期间提供的资源。方法进行了一项描述性研究,描述了锡诺县实施的关键干预措施、现有能力、对重新启动多部门埃博拉病毒病控制战略的影响以及结果。我们还进行了一项横断面研究,以分析干预措施对监测和感染预防与控制(IPC)的影响。结果原疫情期间接受培训的工作人员减员率低,原疫情期间提供的大部分物资、设备和基础设施仍然可用。额外投入1755美元后,IPC分诊指标有所改善,从第一次评估时的平均60%提高到77% (P=0.002)。此外,个人/员工培训从78%提高到89% (P=0.04)。埃博拉病毒病死亡警报与调查的预期死亡的比例从26%增加到63% (P<0.0001)。经过培训的工作人员的少量损耗以及大多数用品、设备和基础设施的可用性,使得多部门埃博拉病毒病控制战略的重新启动既迅速又负担得起。埃博拉病毒病监测的改善可能受到社区参与活动、卫生工作者的认识和指导以及疫情暴发期间设施中临床医生可用性的改善的影响。社区参与可能有助于报告基于社区的事件,特别是社区死亡事件。在支持性监督期间对工作人员的指导也有助于改善IPC指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信