Dir la propria. La prefazione nelle opere dei cronisti moldavi

IF 0.1 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Adriana Senatore
{"title":"Dir la propria. La prefazione nelle opere dei cronisti moldavi","authors":"Adriana Senatore","doi":"10.60133/pj.2023.1.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The essay analyzes the introductions to the Moldavian historical works of the XVI-XVIII centuries. The anonymous Slavonic-language chroniclers of the earlier period say nothing about themselves and the purposes of their creation but enter directly into the heart of the narrative. Instead, Macarie, the first author who signs his work, finds it appropriate to open it with an embryonic preface, in which he talks about himself and the patron, discusses the Moldavian annalistic tradition, clarifies his personal writing experiences and stylistic criteria. Along his lines, the disciples Eftimie and Azarie specify the chronological framework of their exhibitions, glorify the commissioning voivodes and recall the activity of their venerable master. Grigore Ureche, the first historian to use his mother tongue, prefaces his work with brief remarks in which he discusses a theme congenial to him, the educational value of history. In the introduction to De neamul moldovenilor, Miron Costin argues for the need to pierce the darkness around the origins of the Romanian people and expresses himself not only on the uplifting value of literary writing, but also on the aesthetic one. In the joint introduction to his chronicle and collection of legends O samă de cuvinte, Ion Neculce dwells on the late development of the Moldavian historiographical tradition and underlines the edifying value of his commitment. The introductions of the Moldavian historiographers are distinguished by a common trait, a style that is simple and close to the mindset of readers, devoid of the large historical, mythological and literary references that swarm in the writings of fellow Wallachians of those centuries.","PeriodicalId":41055,"journal":{"name":"Philologica Jassyensia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philologica Jassyensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60133/pj.2023.1.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The essay analyzes the introductions to the Moldavian historical works of the XVI-XVIII centuries. The anonymous Slavonic-language chroniclers of the earlier period say nothing about themselves and the purposes of their creation but enter directly into the heart of the narrative. Instead, Macarie, the first author who signs his work, finds it appropriate to open it with an embryonic preface, in which he talks about himself and the patron, discusses the Moldavian annalistic tradition, clarifies his personal writing experiences and stylistic criteria. Along his lines, the disciples Eftimie and Azarie specify the chronological framework of their exhibitions, glorify the commissioning voivodes and recall the activity of their venerable master. Grigore Ureche, the first historian to use his mother tongue, prefaces his work with brief remarks in which he discusses a theme congenial to him, the educational value of history. In the introduction to De neamul moldovenilor, Miron Costin argues for the need to pierce the darkness around the origins of the Romanian people and expresses himself not only on the uplifting value of literary writing, but also on the aesthetic one. In the joint introduction to his chronicle and collection of legends O samă de cuvinte, Ion Neculce dwells on the late development of the Moldavian historiographical tradition and underlines the edifying value of his commitment. The introductions of the Moldavian historiographers are distinguished by a common trait, a style that is simple and close to the mindset of readers, devoid of the large historical, mythological and literary references that swarm in the writings of fellow Wallachians of those centuries.
说出你的想法。摩尔多瓦记者著作的前言
本文分析了16 - 18世纪摩尔多瓦历史著作的介绍。早期的匿名斯拉夫语编年史家对他们自己和他们创作的目的只字未提,而是直接进入叙述的核心。相反,作为第一个在作品上签名的作者,Macarie觉得用一个雏形的序言来开篇是合适的,他在序言中谈到了自己和赞助人,讨论了摩尔多瓦的编年史传统,阐明了他的个人写作经历和风格标准。按照他的思路,门徒埃夫蒂米和阿扎里指定了他们展览的时间框架,美化了委托的voivodes,并回忆了他们可敬的主人的活动。格里戈尔·乌雷切是第一位使用母语的历史学家,他在著作的序言中用简短的评论讨论了一个与他感兴趣的主题,即历史的教育价值。在《De neamul moldovenilor》的导言中,米隆·科斯廷(Miron Costin)认为有必要打破围绕罗马尼亚人起源的黑暗,他不仅表达了文学作品令人振奋的价值,也表达了美学价值。在他的编年史和传说集O samul de cuvinte的联合介绍中,Ion Neculce详述了摩尔多瓦史学传统的后期发展,并强调了他的承诺的教化价值。摩尔多瓦历史学家的介绍有一个共同的特点,即风格简单,接近读者的思维方式,没有那些世纪以来瓦拉几亚人著作中大量的历史、神话和文学参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Philologica Jassyensia
Philologica Jassyensia LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书