Risk perception in PPP infrastructure project financing in India

IF 1.2 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
P. Gupta, H. Verma
{"title":"Risk perception in PPP infrastructure project financing in India","authors":"P. Gupta, H. Verma","doi":"10.1108/jfmpc-07-2019-0060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to examine the risk perception of project sponsors in financing of public–private partnership (PPP) infrastructure projects in India.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe methodology used is survey questionnaire that seeks the perception of risk managers in PPP projects. Rating and relative ranking of risk at various phases of PPP project have been analyzed and supplemented by unstructured interviews.\n\n\nFindings\nThis paper shows that the perception of project sponsors for various levels of project risk categories differ significantly in PPP infrastructure projects. The practices of assessing risk and handling differ among the financing institutions. The ranking of risks shows a disagreement among respondents for relative importance. The project financiers that include major banks and financial institutions funding for the PPP infrastructure projects perceive risks differently, and their disagreement on the relative importance of risks may create a sub-optimality in risk management, and the essence of project sponsorship may be lost.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis paper examines the perceptions of the various risks involved in PPP infrastructure project financing. The authors emphasize on the infrastructure projects in the transportation and energy sector that are undertaken in the PPPs. This research can further be extended to the other infrastructure sectors such as roads, shipping and communication.\n\n\nPractical implications\nExperiences reveal that risk perception profoundly influence the implementation of infrastructure projects involving PPPs. To ensure smooth implementation and success of PPP infrastructure projects, the project sponsors must align, synchronize and develop consensus on the various funding and non-funding risks into the project curriculum.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThe PPP infrastructure projects carry huge investment and are of strategic importance to the nation and society. In order that the provision of infrastructure which can be most economically and efficiently delivered through PPPs, the risk concordance assumes crucial importance.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe authors believe that this research may provide new direction to the visible and invisible misbalances in risk postures of project partners, which has been a cause of concern to the government and policymakers in India in the recent times.\n","PeriodicalId":45720,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/jfmpc-07-2019-0060","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jfmpc-07-2019-0060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the risk perception of project sponsors in financing of public–private partnership (PPP) infrastructure projects in India. Design/methodology/approach The methodology used is survey questionnaire that seeks the perception of risk managers in PPP projects. Rating and relative ranking of risk at various phases of PPP project have been analyzed and supplemented by unstructured interviews. Findings This paper shows that the perception of project sponsors for various levels of project risk categories differ significantly in PPP infrastructure projects. The practices of assessing risk and handling differ among the financing institutions. The ranking of risks shows a disagreement among respondents for relative importance. The project financiers that include major banks and financial institutions funding for the PPP infrastructure projects perceive risks differently, and their disagreement on the relative importance of risks may create a sub-optimality in risk management, and the essence of project sponsorship may be lost. Research limitations/implications This paper examines the perceptions of the various risks involved in PPP infrastructure project financing. The authors emphasize on the infrastructure projects in the transportation and energy sector that are undertaken in the PPPs. This research can further be extended to the other infrastructure sectors such as roads, shipping and communication. Practical implications Experiences reveal that risk perception profoundly influence the implementation of infrastructure projects involving PPPs. To ensure smooth implementation and success of PPP infrastructure projects, the project sponsors must align, synchronize and develop consensus on the various funding and non-funding risks into the project curriculum. Social implications The PPP infrastructure projects carry huge investment and are of strategic importance to the nation and society. In order that the provision of infrastructure which can be most economically and efficiently delivered through PPPs, the risk concordance assumes crucial importance. Originality/value The authors believe that this research may provide new direction to the visible and invisible misbalances in risk postures of project partners, which has been a cause of concern to the government and policymakers in India in the recent times.
印度PPP基础设施项目融资的风险认知
目的本文的目的是检验项目发起人在印度公私合作(PPP)基础设施项目融资中的风险感知。设计/方法/方法所使用的方法是调查问卷,旨在寻求PPP项目中风险管理者的感知。通过非结构化访谈对PPP项目各个阶段的风险评级和相对排名进行了分析和补充。研究结果表明,在PPP基础设施项目中,项目发起人对不同级别项目风险类别的认知存在显著差异。评估风险和处理风险的做法因金融机构而异。风险排名显示,受访者对相对重要性存在分歧。包括为PPP基础设施项目提供资金的主要银行和金融机构在内的项目融资方对风险的看法不同,他们对风险相对重要性的分歧可能会在风险管理中产生次优,项目赞助的本质可能会丧失。研究局限性/含义本文考察了对PPP基础设施项目融资中涉及的各种风险的看法。作者强调了购买力平价中运输和能源部门的基础设施项目。这项研究可以进一步扩展到其他基础设施部门,如道路、航运和通信。实际含义经验表明,风险认知深刻影响涉及PPP的基础设施项目的实施。为了确保PPP基础设施项目的顺利实施和成功,项目发起人必须在项目课程中调整、同步并就各种资金和非资金风险达成共识。社会影响PPP基础设施项目投资巨大,对国家和社会具有重要战略意义。为了通过购买力平价提供最经济、最有效的基础设施,风险一致性至关重要。独创性/价值作者认为,这项研究可能为项目合作伙伴在风险姿态上的可见和无形的失衡提供新的方向,这一直是印度政府和政策制定者近年来关注的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信