The Timing of Islamization in Southeast Asia: Local Agency, and the Challenge of Analysing Religious Conversion

Q3 Arts and Humanities
A. Milner
{"title":"The Timing of Islamization in Southeast Asia: Local Agency, and the Challenge of Analysing Religious Conversion","authors":"A. Milner","doi":"10.1353/ras.2023.a900783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Although much has been written on Islamization in Island Southeast Asia, scholars have puzzled about why conversion did not take place before the 13th century. Taking a history of ideas approach, this essay seeks to examine the process from the perspective of the local rulers—noting the centrality of monarchy in the socio-political configuration of the region. It argues that in early Islamic history, some doctrines influential in Muslim communities were hostile to monarchy and bound to be distasteful to Southeast Asian rulers. When monarchy began to be viewed more positively as an institution in the wider Muslim world—partly because of the impact of Persian ideas, and also influenced by the Sufi idea of the ‘Perfect Man’— significant obstacles to conversion were removed.Having argued why conversion did not take place earlier, the later part of the essay reviews the debate about why the rulers converted at all. After considering political and economic drivers, the question is asked why scholarly analysis has given relatively little attention to specifically religious motivations for conversion.","PeriodicalId":39524,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society","volume":"96 1","pages":"21 - 49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ras.2023.a900783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Although much has been written on Islamization in Island Southeast Asia, scholars have puzzled about why conversion did not take place before the 13th century. Taking a history of ideas approach, this essay seeks to examine the process from the perspective of the local rulers—noting the centrality of monarchy in the socio-political configuration of the region. It argues that in early Islamic history, some doctrines influential in Muslim communities were hostile to monarchy and bound to be distasteful to Southeast Asian rulers. When monarchy began to be viewed more positively as an institution in the wider Muslim world—partly because of the impact of Persian ideas, and also influenced by the Sufi idea of the ‘Perfect Man’— significant obstacles to conversion were removed.Having argued why conversion did not take place earlier, the later part of the essay reviews the debate about why the rulers converted at all. After considering political and economic drivers, the question is asked why scholarly analysis has given relatively little attention to specifically religious motivations for conversion.
东南亚伊斯兰化的时机:地方代理与宗教皈依分析的挑战
摘要:尽管关于东南亚岛屿伊斯兰化的研究已经有很多文章,但学者们一直困惑于为什么在13世纪之前没有发生皈依。本文采用思想史的方法,试图从地方统治者的角度来审视这一过程——注意到君主制在该地区社会政治格局中的中心地位。它认为,在早期伊斯兰历史上,一些在穆斯林社区有影响力的教义敌视君主制,肯定会让东南亚统治者反感。当君主制在更广泛的穆斯林世界中开始被更积极地视为一种制度时——部分原因是波斯思想的影响,也受到苏菲“完美男人”思想的影响——皈依的重大障碍被消除了。在论证了为什么没有更早地进行皈依之后,文章的后半部分回顾了关于统治者为什么皈依的争论。在考虑了政治和经济驱动因素后,人们提出了一个问题,为什么学术分析相对较少关注皈依的具体宗教动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信