Accuracy of radiographic fetal count in ewes

Camille Ogdon, C. Estill, Kelly Van Scoyk, Lauren E Newsom
{"title":"Accuracy of radiographic fetal count in ewes","authors":"Camille Ogdon, C. Estill, Kelly Van Scoyk, Lauren E Newsom","doi":"10.58292/ct.v15.9221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate fetal count is important for farm animal species as the number of fetuses can affect management decisions in both research and production settings. Documented methods of pregnancy diagnosis include radiography, progesterone assays, transrectal palpation, and transrectal and transabdominal ultrasonography; however, there is variability in fetal count accuracy with each of these methods. Abdominal radiography evaluation in 13 pregnant ewes among observers of various skill levels was compared retrospectively with the known number of fetuses determined using computed tomography. Overall accuracy using abdominal radiography across skill levels for determining fetal counts correctly was 79%. Accuracy decreased as the number of fetuses increased, with accuracies for singleton, twin, and triplet pregnancies being 92, 72, and 50%, respectively. Additionally, observer experience was inversely related to radiographic fetal count accuracy.","PeriodicalId":93421,"journal":{"name":"Clinical theriogenology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical theriogenology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58292/ct.v15.9221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate fetal count is important for farm animal species as the number of fetuses can affect management decisions in both research and production settings. Documented methods of pregnancy diagnosis include radiography, progesterone assays, transrectal palpation, and transrectal and transabdominal ultrasonography; however, there is variability in fetal count accuracy with each of these methods. Abdominal radiography evaluation in 13 pregnant ewes among observers of various skill levels was compared retrospectively with the known number of fetuses determined using computed tomography. Overall accuracy using abdominal radiography across skill levels for determining fetal counts correctly was 79%. Accuracy decreased as the number of fetuses increased, with accuracies for singleton, twin, and triplet pregnancies being 92, 72, and 50%, respectively. Additionally, observer experience was inversely related to radiographic fetal count accuracy.
母羊放射线胎儿计数的准确性
准确的胎儿数量对农场动物物种很重要,因为胎儿数量会影响研究和生产环境中的管理决策。有文献记载的妊娠诊断方法包括射线照相、孕酮测定、经直肠触诊、经直肠和经腹部超声检查;然而,每种方法的胎儿计数准确性都存在差异。在不同技术水平的观察者中,对13只怀孕母羊的腹部放射学评估与计算机断层扫描确定的已知胎儿数量进行了回顾性比较。使用腹部放射照相术在不同技能水平上正确确定胎儿计数的总体准确率为79%。准确率随着胎儿数量的增加而下降,单胎、双胎和三胎妊娠的准确率分别为92%、72%和50%。此外,观察者的经验与放射学胎儿计数的准确性呈负相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信